References
- Epp, Carla, and Laura Hochheim. “Restricted: Increasing Access to the Reference Collection.” Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l’Association Des Bibliothèques de La Santé Du Canada 36, no. 2 (2015): 59–62. doi:10.5596/c15-015.
- Bradford, Jane T. “What’s Coming Off the Shelves? A Reference Use Study Analyzing Print Reference Sources Used in a University Library.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31, no. 6 (2005): 546–558. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2005.08.007.
- Hellyer, Paul. “Reference 2.0: The Future of Shrinking Print Reference Collections Seems Destined for the Web.” AALL Spectrum, March (2009): 24–27. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/libpubs/7/.
- The Online Learning Consortium. “Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States,” Accessed February 20, 2019. https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/college-tuition-and-fees-increase-63-percent-since-january-2006.htm. Accessed February 21, 2019.
- Robinson, Tami E., Bob Triplett, and Linda Lambert. “Reference Revitalization and Roving Reference: Are the Reference Desk and Print Reference Sources Passé?” The Christian Librarian 54, no. 2 (2011): 58–65. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/tcl/vol54/iss2/4?utm_source=digitalcommons.georgefox.edu%2Ftcl%2Fvol54%2Fiss2%2F4&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages.
- Ugaz, Ana G., and Taryn Resnick. “Assessing Print and Electronic Use of Reference/Core Medical Textbooks.” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 96, no. 2 (2008): 145–147. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.96.2.145.
- Lederer, Naomi. “Why Libraries Should Retain a Core Print Reference Collection.” The Reference Librarian 57, no. 4 (2016): 307–322. doi:10.1080/02763877.2016.1145093.