References
- Beall, Jeffrey. “Predatory Publishing is Just One of the Consequences of Gold Open Access.” Learned Publishing 26, no. 2 (2013): 79–84. doi:10.1087/20130203
- Bowman, John D. “Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences.” American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 78, no. 10 (2014): 176. doi:10.5688/ajpe7810176
- Eriksson, Stefan and Gert Helgesson. “The False Academy: Predatory Publishing in Science and Bioethics.” Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20, no. 2 (2017): 163–170. doi:10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
- Shamseer, Larissa, David Moher, Onyi Maduekwe, et al. “Potential Predatory and Legitimate Biomedical Journals: Can You Tell the Difference? A Cross-Sectional Comparison.” BMC Medicine 15, no. 1 (2017): 28. doi:10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9
- Cobey, Kelly D., Manoj M. Lalu, Becky Skidmore et al. “What is a Predatory Journal? A Scoping Review [Version 2; Peer Review: 3 Approved].” F100 Research 7, (2018): 1001. doi:10.12688/f1000research.15256.2
- Umlauf, Mary Grace, and Yuki Mochizuki. “Predatory Publishing and Cybercrime Targeting Academics.” International Journal of Nursing Practice 24, no. S1 (2018): e12656. doi:10.1111/ijn.12656
- Masic, Izet. “Predatory Publishing - Experience with Omics International.” Medical Archives 71, no. 5 (2017): 304–307. doi:10.5455/medarh.2017.71.304-307
- Beall, Jeffrey. ““Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers.” The Charleston Advisor 11, no. 4 (2010): 10–17. doi:10.5260/chara.12.1.50
- Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A. “Caution with the Continued Use of Jeffrey Beall’s “Predatory” Open Access Publishing Lists.” AME Medical Journal 2, no. 7 (2017): 97. doi:10.21037/amj.2017.06.14
- Berger, Monica and Jill Cirasella. “Beyond Beall’s List: Better Understanding Predatory Publishers.” College & Research Libraries News 76, no. 3 (2015): 132–135. doi:10.5860/crln.76.3.9277
- Silver, Andrew. “Controversial Website That Lists ‘Predatory’ Publishers Shuts Down.” Nature 541, no. 7638 (2017). doi:10.1038/nature.2017.21328
- Pai, Madhukar. “Predatory Conferences Undermine Science and Scam Academics.” Blog. https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/dr-madhukar-pai/predatory-conferences-academia_b_12467834.html
- Federal Trade Commission. “Court Rules in Ftc’s Favor Against Predatory Academic Publisher Omics Group; Imposes $50.1 Million Judgment Against Defendants That Made False Claims and Hid Publishing Fees.” https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/04/court-rules-ftcs-favor-against-predatory-academic-publisher-omics.
- “Omics International,” accessed February 20, 2019, https://www.omicsonline.org/.
- Lewinski, Allison A., and Marilyn H. Oermann. “Characteristics of E-Mail Solicitations from Predatory Nursing Journals and Publishers.” The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 49, no. 4 (2018): 171–177. doi:10.3928/00220124-20180320-07
- Bazeley, Jennifer W., Jen Waller, and Eric Resnis. “Engaging Faculty in Scholarly Communication Change: A Learning Community Approach.” Journal of Librarianship & Scholarly Communication 2, no. 3 (2014): 1–13.
- “Principles and Strategies for the Reform of Scholarly Communication 1.” American Library Association, accessed February 20, 2019, http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/principlesstrategies.
- Gerberi, Danielle J. “Predatory Journals: Alerting Nurses to Potentially Unreliable Content: Exploitative Publications Are Degrading Scholarly Publishing.” AJN American Journal of Nursing 118, no. 1 (2018): 62–65. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000529721.75417.a4
- Grainger, David W. “Peer Review as Professional Responsibility: A Quality Control System Only as Good as the Participants.” Biomaterials 28, no. 34 (2007): 5199–5203. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.004
- Bohannon, John D. “Who’s Afraid of Peer Review?” Science 342, no. 6154 (2013): 60–65. doi:10.1126/science.342.6154.60
- Committee on Publication Ethics: COPE. “Case Number: 16–22 – Withdrawal of Accepted Manuscript from Predatory Journal,” accessed March 21, 2019, https://publicationethics.org/case/withdrawal-accepted-manuscript-predatory-journal.
- Creative Commons. “Creative Commons Licenses,” accessed March 21, 2019, https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/licensing-types-examples/.
- Owens, Jacqueline K. “More Trends in Predatory Publishing Practices.” Nurse Author & Editor (Blackwell) 25, no. 1 (2015): 1–5.
- Pyne, Derek. “The Rewards of Predatory Publications at a Small Business School.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing 48, no. 3 (2017): 137–160. doi:10.3138/jsp.48.3.137
- “Think. Check. Submit,” accessed February 20, 2019, https://thinkchecksubmit.org/
- Laine, Christine and Margaret A. Winker. “Identifying Predatory or Pseudo-Journals.” WAME Policies (blog). http://www.wame.org/identifying-predatory-or-pseudo-journals
- “Cabells Scholarly Analytics,” accessed February 20, 2019, https://www2.cabells.com/.
- “Ulrich’s Frequently Asked Questions,” accessed February 20, 2019, https://www.ulrichsweb.com/UlrichsWeb/faqs.asp.
- “Directory of Open Access Journals,” accessed February 20, 2019, www.doaj.org.
- Williamson, P. O. and C. I. J. Minter. “Exploring Pubmed as a Reliable Resource for Scholarly Communications Services.” Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA 107, no. 1 (2019): 16–29. doi:10.5195/jmla.2019.433
- Anderson, Kent. “A Confusion of Journals — What Is Pubmed Now?” The Scholarly Kitchen (blog). https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/09/07/confusion-journals-pubmed-now/
- “Internet Archive Wayback Machine,” accessed March 21, 2019, https://archive.org/web/.
- “Archive.Today,” accessed March 21, 2019, http://archive.ph/.
- Braun, Eyal, Francis B. Mimouni, Daniel Mimouni et al. “Opinion: We Need a Replacement for Beall’s List.” The Scientist, August 15, 2017.
- Beall, Jeffrey. “Medical Publishing Triage – Chronicling Predatory Open Access Publishers.” Annals of Medicine Surgery (London) 2, no. 2 (2013): 47–49. doi:10.1016/S2049-0801(13)70035-9
- Rutgers University Libraries. “Predatory Publishing: Evaluation Tools,” accessed May 22, 2019, https://libguides.rutgers.edu/c.php?g=644942&p=4519187.
- Thomas Jefferson University Library. “Predatory Publishing,” accessed May 22, 2019, “https://jefferson.libguides.com/c.php?g=961760&p=6945582.
- Burrell, Nancy A., and DeAnne Priddis. “Survey: Dichotomous Questions.” In The Sage Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, edited by Mike Allen. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2018.