Comparison of Databases for Complex Evidence Syntheses on Education for the Health Professions

References

• Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions. “What is Allied Health?” https://www.asahp.org/what-is (accessed July 17, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn Moffat, “The History of Physical Therapy Practice in the United States,” Journal of Physical Therapy Education 17, no. 3 (2003): 15–25. doi:10.1097/00001416-200310000-00003.
   Google Scholar
• Robin R. Sewell, “Comparing Four CAB Abstracts Platforms from a Veterinary Medicine Perspective,” Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 8, no. 2 (2011): 134–49. doi:10.1080/15424065.2011.576608.
   Google Scholar
• Stephanie M. Ritchie, Kelly M. Banyas, and Carol Sevin, “A Comparison of Selected Bibliographic Database Search Retrieval for Agricultural Information,” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship no. 93 (2019): 1–24. doi:10.29173/istl48.
   Google Scholar
• Jill T. Boruff and Pamela Harrison, “Assessment of Knowledge and Skills in Information Literacy Instruction for Rehabilitation Sciences Students: A Scoping Review,” Journal of the Medical Library Association 106, no. 1 (2018): 15–37. doi:10.5195/jmla.2018.227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelia Grabowsky, “Library Instruction in Communication Disorders: Which Databases Should Be Prioritized?” Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship no. 79 (2015). doi:10.5062/F4707ZFB. 10.29173/istl1627
   Google Scholar
• Judy Schroeder, “An Overlap Analysis of Occupational Therapy Electronic Journals Available in Full-Text Databases and Subscription Services,” Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries 5, no. 4 (2008): 346–61. doi:10.1080/15424060802453720.
   Google Scholar
• Linwood Delong, “Subscribing to Databases: How Important Is Depth and Quality of Indexing?” The Acquisitions Librarian 19, no. 1–2 (2007): 99–106. doi:10.1300/J101v19n37_08.
   Google Scholar
• Cari Merkley, “PubMed is Slightly More Sensitive but More Time Intensive to Search than Ovid MEDLINE,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 6, no. 2 (2011): 51–4. doi:10.18438/B8GK7M.
   Google Scholar
• Steve McDonald, Libby Taylor, and Clive Adams, “Searching the Right Database: A Comparison of Four Databases for Psychiatry Journals,” Health Libraries Review 16, no. 3 (1999): 151–6. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2532.1999.00222.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristin Finch, “A Comparison Analysis of Education Databases: ERIC and Education Full Text,” Mississippi Libraries 74, no. 1 (2010): 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly Blessinger and Maureen Olle, “Content Analysis of the Leading General Academic Databases,” Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services 28, no. 3 (2004): 335–46. doi:10.1016/j.lcats.2004.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margie Ruppel, “Google Scholar, Social Work Abstracts (EBSCO), and PsycINFO (EBSCO),” The Charleston Advisor 10, no. 3 (2009): 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia Minozzi, Vanna Pistotti, and Marco Forni, “Searching for Rehabilitation Articles on MEDLINE and EMBASE. An Example with Cross-over Design,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 81, no. 6 (2000): 720–2. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90099-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James Jatkevicius and Cheryl Sebold, “The ERIC Database: Choosing among Free and Fee-Based Options,” College & Undergraduate Libraries 7, no. 2 (2000): 95–103. doi:10.1300/J106v07n02_09.
   Google Scholar
• Clare Stevinson and Debbie A. Lawlor, “Searching Multiple Databases for Systematic Reviews: Added Value or Diminishing Returns?” Complementary Therapies in Medicine 12, no. 4 (2004): 228–32. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichor M. Bramer, Melissa L. Rethlefsen, Jos Kleijnen, and Oscar H. Franco, “Optimal Database Combinations for Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews: A Prospective Exploratory Study,” Systematic Reviews 6, no. 1 (2017): 245. doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. J. Matthews, A. G. Edwards, J. Barker, M. Bloor, J. Covey, K. Hood, R. Pill, I. Russell, N. Stott, C. Wilkinson, et al. “Efficient Literature Searching in Diffuse Topics: Lessons from a Systematic Review of Research on Communicating Risk to Patients in Primary Care,” Health Libraries Review 16, no. 2 (1999): 112–20. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2532.1999.00219.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alison J. Brettle and Andrew F. Long, “Comparison of Bibliographic Databases for Information on the Rehabilitation of People with Severe Mental Illness,” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association 89, no. 4 (2001): 353–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fiona R. Beyer and Kath. Wright, “Can We Prioritise Which Databases to Search? A Case Study Using a Systematic Review of Frozen Shoulder Management,” Health Information and Libraries Journal 30, no. 1 (2013): 49–58. doi:10.1111/hir.12009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margaret Sampson, Nicholas J. Barrowman, David Moher, Terry P. Klassen, Ba’. Pham, Robert Platt, Philip D. St John, Raymond Viola, and Parminder Raina, “Should Meta-analysts search Embase in Addition to MEDLINE?” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56, no. 10 (2003): 943–55. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00110-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancy Schaefer, Jane Morgan-Daniel, Linda R. Struckmeyer, Christine T. Myers, L. King, Mary Jeghers, S. Medhizadah, and J. Beneciuk, “Librarian and Researcher Assessments of Search Result Relevance: How Well Do They Align?” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 42, no. 2 (2023): 91–107. 10.1080/02763869.2023.2193122
   PubMedGoogle Scholar