Part 1. If We Frame It, They Will Respond: Undergraduate Student Responses to the Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education

References

• Ariew, S. (2014). How we got here: A historical look at the academic teaching library and the role of the teaching librarian. Communications in Information Literacy, 8(2), 208–224.
   Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. (2014, June 17). Framework for information literacy for higher education draft 2. Retrieved from http://acrl.ala.org/ilstandards/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Framework-for-IL-for-HE- Draft-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. (2015a). Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/ilframework
   Google Scholar
• Association of College & Research Libraries. (2015b). Board of directors meeting II: Midwinter meeting minutes. Sheraton Chicago. Retrieved from http://connect.ala.org/files/ACRL%20MW15%20Board%20II%20Minutes%20Draft.docx
   Google Scholar
• Bovill, C., Cook‐Sather, A., & Felten, P. (2011). Students as co‐creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: Implications for academic developers. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(2), 133–145. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.568690
   Google Scholar
• Bravender, P., McClure, H. A., & Schaub, G. (ed.). (2015). Teaching Information Literacy Threshold Concepts: Lesson Plans for Librarians. Chicago, IL: ACRL.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, C. (2015). Teaching students, not standards: The new ACRL information literacy framework and threshold crossings for instructors. Partnership: The Canadian Journal Of Library & Information Practice & Research, 10(1), 1–6. doi:10.21083/partnership.v10i1.3440
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (2015, August 25). Re: Info lit definitions for students [Electronic mailing list message]. Retrieved from http://lists.ala.org/sympa/info/acrlframe
   Google Scholar
• Connaway, L. S., & Powell, R. R. (2010). Basic Research Methods for Librarians. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
   Google Scholar
• Cousin, G. (2009). Researching Learning in Higher Education: An Introduction to Contemporary Methods and Approaches. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foasberg, N. M. (2015). From Standards to Frameworks for IL: How the ACRL Framework addresses critiques of the Standards. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(4), 699–717. doi:10.1353/pla.2015.0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frary, R. B. (2003). A brief guide to questionnaire development. Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~educy520/sec5982/week_3/questionnaire_development_frary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C., & Jacobson, T. E. (2014, May). Informing and extending the draft ACRL information literacy framework for higher education: An overview and avenues for research. College & Research Libraries, 75(3), 250–253. doi:10.5860/0750250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. J. (2013). Learning the ropes: How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college. Retrieved from http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_2013_freshmenstudy_fullreport.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hofer, A. R., Townsend, L., & Brunetti, K. (2012). Troublesome concepts and information literacy: Investigating threshold concepts for IL instruction. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 12(4), 387–405. doi:10.1353/pla.2012.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalik, C., Yutzey, S., & Piazza, L. (2013). Information literacy and high school seniors: Perceptions of the research process. School Library Research, 16, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kuglitsch, R. R. (2015). Teaching for transfer: Reconciling the Framework with disciplinary information literacy. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 15(3), 457–470. doi:10.1353/pla.2015.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundstrom, K., Fagerheim, B. A., & Benson, E. (2014). Librarians and instructors developing student learning outcomes: Using frameworks to lead the process. Reference Services Review, 42(3), 484–498. doi:10.1108/RSR-04-2014-0007
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, P. M. (2015). Pausing at the threshold. Portal: Libraries & the Academy, 15(1), 183–195. doi:10.1353/pla.2015.0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakleaf, M. (2014). A roadmap for assessing student learning Using the new Framework for information literacy for higher education. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40(5), 510–514. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2014.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. P., & Walker, J. R. (2013). Liminal Spaces and Research Identity: The Construction of Introductory Composition Students as Researchers. Pedagogy, 13(1), 9–41. doi:10.1215/15314200-1814260
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., Rasinski, K. A., & Rips, L. J. (2000). The psychology of survey response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, V. M., Weedman, J., Bruce, C. S., & Edwards, S. L. (2014). Learning portals: Analyzing threshold concept theory for LIS education. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 55(2), 150–165.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K. (2015, February 4). More from the ACRL Board on the Framework for information literacy for higher education. Retrieved from http://www.acrl.ala.org/acrlinsider/archives/9814
   Google Scholar