1,090
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Research on Age-Friendly Community Initiatives: Taking Stock and Moving Forward

&

References

  • Alley, D., Liebig, P., Pynoos, J., Banerjee, T., & Choi, I. H. (2007). Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparations for an aging society. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 49(1–2), 1–18.
  • Aneshensel, C. S., Wight, R. G., Miller-Martinez, D., Botticello, A. L., Karlamangla, A. S., & Seeman, T. G. (2007). Urban neighborhoods and depressive symptoms among older adults. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 6B, S52–S59.
  • Austin, C., Des Camp, E., Flux, D., McClelland, R., & Sieppert, J. (2005). Community development with older adults in their neighborhoods: The Elder Friendly Communities Program. Families in Society, 86(3), 401–409.
  • Barron, J. S., Tan, E. J., Yu, Q., Song, M., McGill, S., & Fried, L. P. (2009). Potential for intensive volunteering to promote the health of older adults in fair health. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 86(4), 641–653.
  • Bloomberg, M. R., & Quinn, C. C. (2009). Age friendly NYC: Enhancing our city's livability for older New Yorkers. Retrieved from the City of New York website: http://www.nyc.gov/html/dfta/downloads/pdf/age_friendly/agefriendlynyc.pdf
  • Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
  • Buffel, T., Phillipson, C., & Scharf, T. (2013). Experiences of neighbourhood exclusion and inclusion among older people living in deprived inner-city areas in Belgium and England. Ageing & Society, 33(1), 89–109.
  • Buffel, T., McGarry, P., Phillipson, C., De Donder, L., Dury, S., De Witte, N., … Verté, D. (2014). Developing age-friendly cities: Case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 52–72.
  • Buffel, T., & Phillipson, C. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age- friendly’ cities. Critical Social Policy, 32(4), 597–617.
  • Caro, F. G., & Fitzgerald, K. G. (Eds.). (2016). International perspectives on age-friendly cities. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Cisneros, H., Dyer-Chamberlain, M., & Hickie, J. (Eds.). (2012). Independent for life: Homes and neighborhoods for an aging America. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Clark, K., & Glicksman, A. (2012). Age-friendly Philadelphia: Bringing diverse networks together around aging issues. Journal of Housing for the Elderly, 26(1–3), 121–136.
  • Community Tool Box. (n.d.). The community tool box. Retrieved from http://ctb.ku.edu/en
  • County Health Rankings. (2016). Action center. Retrieved from http://www.countyhealthrankings.org/roadmaps/action-center
  • Emlet, C. A., & Moceri, J. T. (2012). The importance of social connectedness in building age- friendly communities. Journal of Aging Research. doi:10.1155/2012/173247
  • Feldman, P. H., Oberlink, M. R., Simantov, E., & Gursen, M. D. (2004). A tale of two older Americas: Community opportunities and challenges: AdvantAge initiative 2003 national survey of adults aged 65 and older. New York, NY: Center for Home Care Policy and Research.
  • FrameWorks Institute. (2016). Aging. Retrieved from http://frameworksinstitute.org/reframing-aging.html
  • Garon, S., Paris, M., Beaulieu, M., Veil, A., & Laliberte, A. (2014). Collaborative partnership in age-friendly cities: Two case studies from Quebec, Canada. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 73–87.
  • Gitlin, L. N., Corcoran, M., Winter, L., Boyce, A., & Hauck, W. W. (2001). A randomized, controlled trial of a home environmental intervention effect on efficacy and upset in caregivers and on daily function of persons with dementia. The Gerontologist, 41(1), 4–14.
  • Glicksman, A., Clark, K., Kleban, M. H., Ring, L., & Hoffman, C. (2014). Building an integrated research/policy planning age-friendly agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 131–146.
  • Grantmakers in Aging. (n.d.). Age-friendly America database. Retrieved from http://www.giaging.org/programs-events/community-agenda/community-agenda-database
  • Grantmakers in Aging. (2015). Guiding principles for the sustainability of age-friendly community efforts. Retrieved from: http://www.giaging.org/documents/160107__Sustainability_Principles.pdf
  • Grantmakers in Aging. (2016). The case for age-friendly communities. Retrieved from http://www.giaging.org/documents/160302_Case_for_AFC.pdf
  • Green, G. (2013). Age-friendly cities of Europe. Journal of Urban Health, 90(1), 116–128.
  • Greenfield, E. A. (2012). Using ecological frameworks to advance a field of research, practice, and policy on aging-in-place initiatives. The Gerontologist, 52(1), 1–12.
  • Greenfield, E. A., Oberlink, M., Scharlach, A. E., Neal, M. B., & Stafford, P. B. (2015). Age- friendly community initiatives: Conceptual issues and key questions. The Gerontologist, 55, 191–198.
  • Hanson, D., & Emlet, C. A. (2006). Assessing a community's elder friendliness: A case example of the AdvantAge initiative. Family & Community Health, 29(4), 266–278.
  • International Federation for Ageing. (n.d.). Age-friendly environments. Retrieved from http://www.ifa-fiv.org/project/age-friendly-environments
  • Jenkins, J. (2016). Disrupt aging: A bold new path to living your best life at every age. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
  • Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41.
  • Kerr, J., Rosenberg, D., & Frank, L. (2012). The role of the built environment in healthy aging: Community design, physical activity, and health among older adults. Journal of Planning Literature, 27(1), 43–60.
  • Keyes, L., Phillips, D. R., Sterling, E., Manegdeg, T., Kelly, M., Trimble, G., & Mayerik, C. (2014). Transforming the way we live together: A model to move communities from policy to implementation. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 117–130.
  • Lawton, M. P. (1998). Environment and aging: Theory revisited. Contributions to the Study of Aging, 26, 1–32.
  • Lawton, M. P. (1982). Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In M. P. Lawton, P. G. Windley, & T. O. Byerts (Eds.), Aging and the environment: Theoretical approaches (pp. 33–59).
  • Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973). Ecology and the aging process. In C. Eisdorf, & M. Lawton (Eds.), The psychology of adult development and aging (pp. 619–670). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Lehning, A. J., Smith, R. J., & Dunkle, R. E. (2015). Do age-friendly characteristics influence the expectation to age in place? A comparison of low-income and higher income Detroit elders. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 34(2), 158–180.
  • Lehning, A. J., Smith, R. J., & Dunkle, R. E. (2014). Age-friendly environments and self-rated health: An exploration of Detroit elders. Research on Aging, 36, 72–94.
  • Liu, S. Y., & Lapane, K. L. (2009). Residential modifications and decline in physical function among community-dwelling older adults. The Gerontologist, 49(3), 344–354. doi:10.1093/geront/gnp033
  • Lui, C. W., Everingham, J. A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). What makes a community age-friendly: A review of international literature. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 28(3), 116–121.
  • Maier, H., & Klumb, P. L. (2005). Social participation and survival at older ages: Is the effect driven by activity content or context? European Journal of Ageing, 2(1), 31–39.
  • Menec, V. H., Novek, S., Veselyuk, D., & McArthur, J. (2014). Lessons learned from a Canadian province-wide age-friendly initiative: The Age-Friendly Manitoba Initiative. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 33–51.
  • Moulaert, T., & Garon, S. (2016). Introduction: Toward a better understanding of AFCC. In Age-friendly cities and communities in international comparison (pp. 1–16). New York, NY: Springer International Publishing.
  • National Prevention, Health Promotion and Public Health Council. (2011). National prevention strategy. Retrieved from http://www.surgeongeneral.gov/priorities/prevention/strategy/report.pdf
  • Neal, M., DeLaTorre, A., & Carder, P. (2014). Age-friendly Portland: A university-city-community partnership. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1), 88–101. doi:10.1080/08959420.2014.854651
  • Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (n.d.). Healthy people 2020. https://www.healthypeople.gov/
  • Ozanne, E., Biggs, S., & Kurowski, W. (2014). Competing frameworks in planning for the aged in the growth corridors of Melbourne. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 26(1–2), 147–165.
  • Plouffe, L., & Kalache, A. (2010). Towards global age-friendly cities: Determining urban features that promote active aging. Journal of Urban Health, 87(5), 733–739.
  • Rothman, J. (2007). Multi modes of intervention at the macro level. Journal of Community Practice, 15(4), 11–40.
  • Scharlach, A. E. (2012). Creating age-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing International, 37, 25–38.
  • Scharlach, A., Davitt, J., Lehning, A., Greenfield, E., & Graham, C. (2014). Does the Village model help to foster age-friendly communities? Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 26, 181–196. doi:10.1080/08959420.2014.854664
  • Scharlach, A. E., & Lehning, A. J. (2016). Creating aging-friendly communities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Shapiro, A., & Taylor, M. (2002). Effects of a community-based early intervention program on the subjective well-being, institutionalization, and mortality of low-income elders. The Gerontologist, 42(3), 334–341.
  • Smith, R. J., Lehning, A. J., & Dunkle, R. E. (2013). Conceptualizing age-friendly community characteristics in a sample of urban elders: An exploratory factor analysis. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 56, 90–111.
  • Stafford, P. B. (2009). Elderburbia: Aging with a sense of place in America. Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO.
  • Stanford Center on Longevity. (2011). Redesigning long life. Retrieved from: http://longevity.stanford.edu/blog/2011/05/04/redesigning-long-life/
  • Weil, M., Gamble, D. N., & Ohmer, M. L. (2013). Evolution, models, and the changing context of community practice. In M. Weil, M. Reisch, & M. L. Ohmer (Eds.), The handbook of community practice (2nd ed., pp. 167–193). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • World Health Organization. (2007). Global age-friendly cities: A guide. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/Global_age_friendly_cities_Guide_English.pdf
  • World Health Organization Centre for Health Development. (2015). Measuring the age-friendliness of cities: A guide to using core indicators. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/kobe_centre/ageing/age_friendly_cities/AFC_Indicator_Guide_Pilot_English.pdf
  • World Health Organization. (2015, September). Age-friendly practice database launched. Retrieved from https://extranet.who.int/agefriendlyworld/age-friendly-practice-database-launched
  • Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.