Evaluating Asthma Control: A Comparison of Measures Using an Item Response Theory Approach

References

• Vollmer W M. Assessment of asthma control and severity. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004; 93: 409–414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich P. Improving asthma control: Talk is not cheap. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2005; 94: 415–418
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glaxo Wellcome Inc. editor. Asthma in Canada—A Landmark Survey. Glaxo Wellcome Inc. 2000; 1–31
   Google Scholar
• Kips J C, Pauwels R A. Asthma control: Where do we fail?. Eur Resp J 2000; 16: 797–798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlton B G, Lucas D O, Ellis E F, Conboy-Ellis K, Shoheiber O, Stempel D A. The status of asthma control and asthma prescribing practices in the united states: Results of a large prospective asthma control survey of primary care practices. J Asthma 2005; 42: 529–535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stempel D A, McLaughin T P, Stanford R H, Fuhlbrigge A L. Patterns of asthma control: A 3-year analysis of patient claims. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 935–939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaga M, Papageorgiou N, Zervas E, Gioulekas D, Konstantopoulos S. Control of asthma under specialist care—Is it achieved?. Chest 2005; 128: 78–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe K F, Vermeire P A, Soriano J B, Maier W C. Clinical management of asthma in 1999: The Asthma Insights and Reality in Europe (AIRE) study. Eur Resp J 2000; 16: 802–807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche N, Morel H, Martel P, Godard P. Clinical practice guidelines: Medical follow-up of patients with asthma—Adults and adolescents. Respir Med 2005; 99: 793–815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulet L P, Becker A, Berube D, Beveridge R, Ernst P. Canadian Asthma Consensus Report, 1999. Canadian Asthma Consensus Group. Can Med Assoc J 1999; 161: S1–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulet L P, Phillips R, O'Byrne P, Becker A. Evaluation of asthma control by physicians and patients: Comparison with current guidelines. Can Resp J 2000; 9: 417–423
   Google Scholar
• Demoly P, Crestani B, Leroyer C, Magnan A, Mounedji N, Humbert M. Control and exacerbation of asthma: A survey of more than 3000 French physicians. Allergy 2004; 59: 920–926
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watson L, Kerstjens H AM, Rabe K F, Kiri V, Visick G T, Postma D S. Obtaining optimal control in mild asthma: Theory and practice. Fam Pr 2005; 22: 305–310
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grimby G, Andren E, Holmgren E, Wright B, Linacre J M, Sundh V. Structure of a combination of functional independence measure and instrumental activity measure items in community-living persons: A study of individuals with cerebral palsy and spina bifida. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1109–1114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji T, Liu M, Toikawa H, Hanayama K, Sonoda S, Chino N. Adl structure for nondisabled Japanese children based on the functional independence measure for children (WeeFIM(TM)). Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 78: 208–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuji T, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Liu M, Chino N. ADL structure for stroke patients in Japan based on the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 432–438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverstein B, Fisher W P, Kilgore K M, Harley J P, Harvey R F. Applying Psychometric criteria to functional assessment in medical rehabilitation. 2. Defining Interval Measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 507–518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink P, Ornbol E, Huyse F J, De Jonge P, Lobo A, Herzog T, et al. A brief diagnostic screening instrument for mental disturbances in general medical wards. J Psychosomat Res 2004; 57: 17–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbucher J W, Labouvie E, Martin C S, Sanjuan P M, Bavly L, Kirisci L, et al. An application of item response theory analysis to alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine criteria in DSM-IV. J Abn Psych 2004; 113: 72–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong D R, Brown R A, Ramsey S E, Myers M G. Nicotine dependence measures among adolescents with psychiatric disorders: Evaluating symptom expression as a function of dependence severity. Nicotine Tob Res 2003; 5: 735–746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Pilkonis P A, Frank E, Thase M E, Reynolds C F. Differential functioning of the Beck depression inventory in late-life patients: Use of item response theory. Psych Aging 2002; 17: 379–391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bond T G, Fox C M. Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in Human Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 2001
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton R K, Swaminathan H, Rogers H J. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Sage Publications, New Delhi 1991
   Google Scholar
• A User's Guide to WINSTEPS. MESA Press, Chicago 2000
   Google Scholar
• Muraki E. A Generalized Partial Credit Model. Handbook of Modern Item Response Theory, W J van der Linden, R K Hambleton. Springer, Berlin 1997; 153–164
   Google Scholar
• Linacre J M. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Measure 2002; 3: 85–106
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schatz M, Mosen D, Apter A J, Zeiger R S, Vollmer W M, Stibolt T B, et al. Relationships among quality of life, severity, and control measures in asthma: An evaluation using factor analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2005; 115: 1049–1055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbri L M, Stoloff S. Is mild asthma really ‘mild’?. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59: 692–703
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ware J E, Bjorner J B, Kosinski M. Dynamic health assessments: The search for more practical and more precise outcome measures. Mapi Research Instit Qual Life Res Newsltr 1999; 21: 11–13
   Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Bjorner J B, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing—A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med Care 2000; 38: 73–82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171–178
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nathan R A, Sorkness C A, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li J T, Marcus P, et al. Development of the asthma control test: A survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 113: 59–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper E F, Svensson K, Mork A C, Stahl E. Measurement properties and interpretation of three shortened versions of the asthma control questionnaire. Respir Med 2005; 99: 553–558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juniper E F, Guyatt G H, Cox F M, Ferrie P J, King D R. Development and validation of the mini asthma quality of life questionnaire. Eur Resp J 1999; 14: 32–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes N C, Williams A E. Unscheduled healthcare resource use among asthma patients receiving low-dose inhaled corticosteroids maintenance treatment. Int J Clin Pract 2005; 59: 1017–1024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjorner J B, Kristensen T S. Multi-item scales for measuring global self-rated health—Investigation of construct validity using structural equations models. Res Aging 1999; 21: 417–439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware J E, Kosinski M, Bjorner J B, Bayliss M S, Batenhorst A, Dahlof C GH, et al. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual Life Res 2003; 12: 935–952
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar