References
- Mannino D M, Homa D M, Akinbami L J, Moorman J E, Gwynn C, Redd S. Surveillance for asthma–United States, 1980–1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 2002; 51: 1–13, (SS01)
- Crapo R O, Casaburi R, Coates A L, Enright P L, Hankinson J L, Irvin C G, MacIntyre N R, McKay R T, Wanger J S. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 309–329
- Cockcroft D W, Davis B E, Todd D C, Smycniuk A J. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods. Chest 2005; 127: 839–844
- Prieto L, Ferrer A, Domenech J, Perez-Frances C. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006; 97: 175–181
- Allen N D, Davis B E, Hurst T S, Cockcroft D W. Difference between dosimeter and tidal breathing methacholine challenge: contributions of dose and deep inspiration bronchoprotection. Chest 2005; 128: 4018–4023
- Todd D C, Davis B E, Hurst T S, Cockcroft D W. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004; 114: 517–519
- Prieto L, Lopez V, Llusar R, Rojas R, Marin J. Differences in the response to methacholine between the tidal breathing and dosimeter methods: influence of the dose of bronchoconstrictor agent delivered to the mouth. Chest 2008; 134: 699–703
- Miller M R, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, van der Grinten C PM, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson D C, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen O F, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J. ATS/ERS Task Force: Standardisation of lung function testing. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005; 26: 319–338
- Hankinson J L, Odencrantz J R, Fedan K B. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U. S. population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999; 159: 179–187
- Toelle B G, Peat J K, Salome C M, Crane J, McMillan D, Dermand J, D'Souza W, Wookcock A J. Comparison of two epidemiological protocols for measuring airway responsiveness and allergic sensitivity in adults. Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1798–1804
- Bennett J B, Davies R J. A comparison of histamine and methacholine bronchial challenges using the DeVilbiss 646 nebulizer and the Rosenthal-French dosimeter. Br J Dis Chest 1987; 81: 252–259
- Knox A J, Wisniewski A, Cooper S, Cooper S, Tattersfield A E. A comparison of the Yan and a dosimeter method for methacholine challenge in experienced and inexperienced subjects. Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 497–502
- Asher M I, Bertrand J M, Beaudry P H, Coates A L. Histamine inhalation challenge in children: a comparison of two methods. Ann Allergy 1983; 50: 389–392
- Hargreave F E, Ryan G, Thomson N C, O'Byrne P M, Latimer K, Juniper E F. Bronchial responsiveness to histamine or methacholine in asthma: measurement and clinical significance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1981; 68: 347–355
- Khalid I, Obeid I., DiGiovine B, Khalid U, Morris Z Q. Predictive Value of Sgaw, FEF25–75, and FEV1 for Development of Asthma after a Negative Methacholine Challenge Test. Journal of Asthma 2009; 46: 284–290
- Schwartz J, Schindler C, Zemp E, Perruchoud A P, Zellweger J P, Wuthrich B, Leuenberger P, Ackermann-Liebrich U. Predictors of methacholine responsiveness in a general population. Chest 2002; 122: 812–820
- Paoletti P, Carrozzi L, Viegi G, Modena P, Ballerin L, DiPede F, Grado L, Baldacci S, Pedreschi M, Vellutini M. Distribution of bronchial responsiveness in a general population: effect of sex, age, smoking, and level of pulmonary function. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995; 151: 1770–1777
- Joseph C L, Ownby D R, Peterson E L, Johnson C C. Racial differences in physiologic parameters related to asthma among middle-class children. Chest 2000; 117: 1336–1344