Conversations with Other-than-Human Creatures: Unpacking the Ambiguity of “with” for Multispecies Rhetorics

Works Cited

• Adams, Paul C. “Placing the Anthropocene: A Day in the Life of an Enviro‐Organism.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 41, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 54–65. doi: 10.1111/tran.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bannon, Bryan E. “Animals, Language, and Life: Searching for Animal Attunement with Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty.” Environmental Philosophy, vol. 6, no. 1, 2009, pp. 21–34. JSTOR. doi:10.5840/envirophil2009612.
   Google Scholar
• Bapteste, Eric, and John Dupré. “Towards a Processual Microbial Ontology.” Biology & Philosophy, vol. 28, no. 2, Mar. 2013, pp. 379–404. doi: 10.1007/s10539-012-9350-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Half-Way.Duke UP, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, Scot, and Casey Boyle. “Introduction: Rhetorical Ontology, or How to Do Things with Things.” Rhetoric, Through Everyday Things, edited by Scot Barnett and Casey Boyle, U of Alabama P, 2016, pp. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bazerman, Charles. A Theory of Literate Action: Literate Action Volume 2.Parlor P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Beekman, Madeleine, and Tanya Latty. “Brainless but Multi-Headed: Decision Making by the Acellular Slime Mould Physarum Polycephalum.” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 427, no. 23, Nov. 2015, pp. 3734–43. ScienceDirect. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, Karen, et al. “Locating Scientific Citizenship: The Institutional Contexts and Cultures of Public Engagement.” Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 35, no. 4, Jul. 2010, pp. 474–500. doi:10.1177/0162243909345835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. “Posthuman Humanities.” European Educational Research Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, Mar. 2013, pp. 1–19. SAGE Journals. doi:10.2304/eerj.2013.12.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, Kenneth. Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Literature, and Method.U of California P, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason. “Democratizing Science in the UK: The Case of Radioactive Waste Management.” Science and Citizens: Globalization and the Challenge of Engagement, edited by Melissa Leach, et al., Zed P, 2005, pp. 237–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Brian R., et al. “The Persistence of ‘Normal’ Catchment Management despite the Participatory Turn: Exploring the Power Effects of Competing Frames of Reference.” Social Studies of Science, vol. 43, no. 5, Oct. 2013, pp. 754–79. doi:10.1177/0306312713478670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosato, Giulia, et al. “The Impact of CUP1 Gene Copy-Number and XVI-VIII/XV-XVI Translocations on Copper and Sulfite Tolerance in Vineyard Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Strain Populations.” FEMS Yeast Research, vol. 20, no. 4, 2020, foaa028. doi:10.1093/femsyr/foaa028.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cushman, Ellen, et al. “Decolonizing Projects: Creating Pluriversal Possibilities in Rhetoric.” Rhetoric Review, vol. 38, no. 1, Jan. 2019, pp. 1–22. doi:10.1080/07350198.2019.1549402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Diane. “Autozoography: Notes toward a Rhetoricity of the Living.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 47, no. 4, 2014, pp. 533–53. Penn State UP. doi:10.5325/philrhet.47.4.0533.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Diane. “Some Reflections on the Limit.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 3, May 2017, pp. 275–84. doi: 10.1080/02773945.2017.1309923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro, Eduardo Viveiros “Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation.” Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, vol. 2, no. 1, 2004, p. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Despret, Vinciane. “The Becomings of Subjectivity in Animal Worlds.” Subjectivity, vol. 23, no. 1, Jul. 2008, pp. 123–39. doi: 10.1057/sub.2008.15.
   Google Scholar
• Despret, Vinciane. “The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis.” Body & Society, vol. 10, no. 2–3, Jun. 2004, pp. 111–34. doi: 10.1177/1357034X04042938.
   Google Scholar
• Despret, Vinciane. Domesticating Practices: The Case of Arabian Babblers. Routledge International Handbooks, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Despret, Vinciane. “Responding Bodies and Partial Affinities in Human–Animal Worlds.” Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 7–8, Dec. 2013, pp. 51–76. doi: 10.1177/0263276413496852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despret, Vinciane. What Would Animals Say if We Asked the Right Questions? U of Minnesota P, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Despret, Vinciane, and Michel Meuret. “Cosmoecological Sheep and the Arts of Living on a Damaged Planet.” Environmental Humanities, vol. 8, no. 1, May 2016, pp. 24–36. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3527704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson, Adam. Anatomic.Coach House Books, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights.Oxford UP, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Donati, Kelly. “‘Herding Is His Favourite Thing in the World’: Convivial World-Making on a Multispecies Farm.” Journal of Rural Studies, vol. 66, Feb. 2019, pp. 119–29. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran-Nebreda, Salva, and George W. Bassel. “Plant Behaviour in Response to the Environment: Information Processing in the Solid State.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 374, no. 1774, Jun. 2019, pp. 20180370. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrando, Francisca. Philosophical Posthumanism.Bloomsbury Academic, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, Hans-Curt, et al. “Biofilms: An Emergent Form of Bacterial Life.” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 9, Sept. 2016, pp. 563–75. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraldo Herrera, Cesar Enrique. Microbes and Other Shamanic Beings. Springer, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhough, Beth. “Where Species Meet and Mingle: Endemic Human-Virus Relations, Embodied Communication and More-than-Human Agency at the Common Cold Unit 1946–90.” Cultural Geographies, vol. 19, no. 3, Jul. 2012, pp. 281–301. doi: 10.1177/1474474011422029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. Manifestly Haraway. U of Minnesota P, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, Oct. 1988, pp. 575–99. JSTOR. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke UP, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. When Species Meet. U of Minnesota P, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hawhee, Debra. “Toward a Bestial Rhetoric.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 44, no. 1, Feb. 2011, pp. 81–87. doi: 10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. Katherine. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics.U of Chicago P, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger, Martin. The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Translated by William McNeill and Nicholas Walker, Indiana UP, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Holden, Madronna. “Re-Storying the World: Reviving the Language of Life – AHR.” Re-Storying the World: Reviving the Langauge of Life, no. 47, 2009. http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2009/11/01/re-storying-the-world-reviving-the-language-of-life/.
   Google Scholar
• Ignatov, Anatoli. “African Orature as Ecophilosophy: Tuning in to the Voices of the Land.” GeoHumanities, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2016, pp. 76–91. doi: 10.1080/2373566X.2016.1166977.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, Andrea, et al. “A Decolonial Approach to Innovation? Building Paths Towards Buen Vivir.” The Journal of Development Studies, vol. 58, no. 9, 2022, pp. 1633–50. doi:10.1080/00220388.2022.2043281.
   Google Scholar
• Joye, Samantha, and Joel E. Kostka. “Microbial Genomics of the Global Ocean System.” 17 Apr. 2020, https://www.asmscience.org/content/colloquia.58.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Evelyn Fox. “Lexicons, Kind-Terms, and World Changes.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, vol. 42, no. 5, 2012, pp. 527–31. doi:10.1525/hsns.2012.42.5.527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, George A. “A Hoot in the Dark: The Evolution of General Rhetoric.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 25, no. 1, 1992, pp. 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koban, John. “Walleye Wars and Pedagogical Management: Cooperative Rhetorics of Responsibility in Response to Settler Colonialism.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 5, 2020, pp. 321–34. doi:10.1080/02773945.2020.1813324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, Eduardo. How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology beyond the Human.U of California P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kolter, Roberto, and Scott Chimileski. “The End of Microbiology.” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 20, no. 6, 2018, pp. 1955–59. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langford, Jean M. “Avian Bedlam toward a Biosemiosis of Troubled Parrots.” Environmental Humanities, vol. 9, no. 1, May 2017, pp. 84–107. doi: 10.1215/22011919-3829145.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, Rebecca Lorimer. “Multilingual Writing as Rhetorical Attunement.” College English, vol. 76, no. 3, 2014, pp. 227–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, Jamie. “Elephants as Companion Species: The Lively Biogeographies of Asian Elephant Conservation in Sri Lanka.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 35, no. 4, 2010, pp. 491–506. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00395.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, Nick Vallespir, et al. “Division of Labor, Bet Hedging, and the Evolution of Mixed Biofilm Investment Strategies.” MBio, vol. 8, no. 4, Sept. 2017. doi:10.1128/mBio.00672-17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michael, Mike. “‘What are We Busy Doing?’ Engaging the Idiot.” Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 37, no. 5, Sept. 2012, pp. 528–54. doi: 10.1177/0162243911428624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice.Duke UP, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Muckelbauer, John. “Domesticating Animal Theory.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 44, no. 1, 2011, pp. 95–100. Penn State UP. doi:10.5325/philrhet.44.1.0095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagaki, Toshiyuki, et al. “Maze-Solving by an Amoeboid Organism.” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, Sept. 2000, pp. 470–470. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/35035159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plec, Emily, et al. “The Salmon Imperative.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 47, no. 3, May 2017, pp. 247–56. doi:10.1080/02773945.2017.1309909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rickert, Thomas. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. U of Pittsburgh P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Rickert, Thomas. “In the House of Doing: Rhetoric and the Kairos of Ambience.” JAC, vol. 24, no. 4, 2004, pp. 901–27.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Deborah Bird. “Pattern, Connection, Desire: In Honour of Gregory Bateson – AHR.” Australian Humanities Review, vol. 6, no. 1, 2005. http://australianhumanitiesreview.org/2005/06/01/pattern-connection-desire-in-honour-of-gregory-bateson/
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., and K. L. Fode. “The Effect of Experimenter Bias on the Performance of the Albino Rat.” Behavioral Science, vol. 8, no. 3, 1963, pp. 183–89. doi:10.1002/bs.3830080302.
   Google Scholar
• Sagan, Dorion. “Introduction: Umwelt after Uexküll.” In A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans with A Theory of Meaning. U of Minnesota P, 2010. pp. 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelin, Erik. Designer and Goldcrest. Sorgenfri P, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. 1st ed., Routledge, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, Jack C. “Biochemical Ecology: How Plants Fight Dirty.” Nature, vol. 416, no. 6878, Mar. 2002, pp. 267–267. Nature Publishing Group. doi:10.1038/416267a.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz, Jack C. “Plants Are Just Very Slow Animals.” mospace.umsystem.edu, Mar. 2010. https://mospace.umsystem.edu/xmlui/handle/10355/6759.
   Google Scholar
• Sebeok, Thomas. A Sign Is Just A Sign.Indiana UP, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J. A. “Bacteria are Small but Not Stupid: Cognition, Natural Genetic Engineering and Socio-Bacteriology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 38, no. 4, Dec. 2007, pp. 807–19. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2007.09.010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stormer, Nathan, and Bridie McGreavy. “Thinking Ecologically about Rhetoric’s Ontology: Capacity, Vulnerability, and Resilience.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 50, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1–25. Penn State UP. doi:10.5325/philrhet.50.1.0001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strope, Pooja K., et al. “The 100-Genomes Strains, an S. Cerevisiae Resource that Illuminates Its Natural Phenotypic and Genotypic Variation and Emergence as an Opportunistic Pathogen.” Genome Research, vol. 25, no. 5, May 2015, pp. 762–74. doi:10.1101/gr.185538.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szymanski, Erika Amethyst. “Remaking Yeast: Metaphors as Scientific Tools in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae 2.0.” BioSocieties, vol. 14, no. 3, 2019, pp. 416–37. doi:10.1057/s41292-018-0134-z.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, Erika, and Jane Calvert. “Designing with Living Systems in the Synthetic Yeast Project.” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, Dec. 2018. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05332-z.
   Google Scholar
• Szymanski, Erika, and Emily Scher. “Models for DNA Design Tools: The Trouble with Metaphors Is that They Don’t Go Away.” ACS Synthetic Biology, vol. 8, iss. 12, 2019, pp. 2635–41. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.9b00302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Todd, Zoe. “An Indigenous Feminist’s Take on the Ontological Turn: ‘Ontology’ Is Just Another Word for Colonialism: An Indigenous Feminist’s Take on the Ontological Turn.” Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 29, no. 1, Mar. 2016, pp. 4–22. doi: 10.1111/johs.12124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewavas, Anthony. “Aspects of Plant Intelligence.” Annals of Botany, vol. 92, no. 1, Jul. 2003, pp. 1–20. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcg101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loon, Leendert C. “The Intelligent Behavior of Plants.” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 21, no. 4, Apr. 2016, pp. 286–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Uexküll, Jakob. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With A Theory of Meaning. Translated by Joseph D. O’Neil, U of Minnesota P, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Wendy. “Figures in a Landscape: Biosemiotics and the Ecological Evolution of Cultural Creativity.” L’Esprit Créateur, vol. 46, no. 2, 2006, pp. 100–10. doi:10.1353/esp.2006.0029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, Wendy. The Whole Creature: Complexity, Biosemiotics, and the Evolution of Culture.Lawrence and Wishart, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, Cary. What Is Posthumanism? U of Minnesota P, 2009.
   Google Scholar