(Re)Turning to Hypertext: Mattering Digital Learning Spaces

Works Cited

• Baake, Ken. Metaphor and Knowledge: The Challenges of Writing Science. State U of New York P, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. “Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart.” Parallax, vol. 20, no. 3, 2014, pp. 168–87. doi:10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Mechanics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke UP, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. “Posthuman Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman, Indiana UP, 2008, pp. 120–56.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. “Quantum Entanglements and Hauntological Relations of Inheritance: Dis/continuities, Spacetime Enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.” Derrida Today, vol. 3, no. 2, 2010, pp. 240–68. doi:10.3366/drt.2010.0206.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. “Re(con)figuring Space, Time, and Matter.” Feminist Locations: Global and Local, Theory and Practice, edited by Marianne DeKoven, Rutgers UP, 2001, pp. 75–109.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. “Troubling Time/s and Ecologies of Nothingness: Re-turning, Re-membering, and Facing the Incalculable.” New Formations, vol. 92, 2018, pp. 56–86. doi:10.3898/NEWF:92.05.2017.
   Google Scholar
• Barnet, Belinda. Memory Machines: The Evolution of Hypertext. Anthem P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomae, David. “Inventing the University.” Journal of Basic Writing, vol. 5, no. 1, 1986, pp. 4–23. doi:10.37514/JBW-J.1986.5.1.02.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, Jay, and Richard Grusin. Remediation: Understanding New Media. NCTE, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Casey. Rhetoric as Posthuman Practice. The Ohio State UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Casey, et al. “The Digital: Rhetoric behind and beyond the Screen.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, 2018, pp. 251–59. doi:10.1080/02773945.2018.1454187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, Laura. “Fault Lines in the Terrain of Distance Education.” Computers and Composition, vol. 18, 2001, pp. 347–58. doi:10.1016/S8755-4615(01)00067-6.
   Google Scholar
• Cicero. De Oratore. Translated by E.W. Sutton. Harvard UP, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Colton, Jared, and Steve Holmes. Rhetoric, Technology, and the Virtues. Utah State UP, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke UP, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Marilyn. “Rhetorical Agency as Enacted and Emergent.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 62, no. 3, 2011, pp. 420–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, Michel. The Practice of Everyday Life. U of California P, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• DePew, Kevin, et al. “Designing Efficiencies: The Parallel Narratives of Distance Education and Composition Studies.” Computers and Composition, vol. 23, no. 1, 2006, pp. 49–67. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2005.12.005.
   Google Scholar
• DigiRhet.org. “Teaching Digital Rhetoric: Community, Critical Engagement, and Application.” Pedagogy, vol. 6, no. 2, 2006, pp. 231–59. doi:10.1215/15314200-2005-003.
   Google Scholar
• Fleckenstein, Kristie. “Materiality’s Rhetorical Word: The Nineteenth-Century Parlor Stereoscope and the Second-Naturing of Vision.” Rhetoric Through Everyday Things, edited by Scot Barnet and Casey Boyle, The U of Alabama P, 2016, pp. 125–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, Laurie. “Iconographic Tracking: A Digital Research Method for Visual Rhetoric and Circulation Studies.” Computers and Composition, vol. 30, 2013, pp. 332–48. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2013.10.006.
   Google Scholar
• Gries, Laurie. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. Utah State UP, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, Angela. “Race, Rhetoric, and Technology: A Case Study of Decolonial Technical Communication Theory, Methodology, and Pedagogy.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 26, no. 3, 2012, pp. 277–310. doi:10.1177/1050651912439539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, Angela. “Wampum as Hypertext: An American Indian Intellectual Tradition of Multimedia Theory and Practice.” Studies in American Indian Literatures, vol. 19, no. 4, 2007, pp. 77–100. doi:10.1353/ail.2008.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart-Davidson, William. “Studying the Mediated Action of Composing with Time-Use Diaries.” Digital Writing Research, edited by Heidi McKee and Danielle DeVoss, Hampton P Inc, 2007, pp. 153–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hartson, Rex, and Pardha Pyla. The UX Book: Process and Guidelines for Ensuring a Quality User Experience. Elsevier, Inc, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Heilker, Paul. “On Genres as Ways of Being.” Writing on the Edge, vol. 21, no. 2, 2011, pp. 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsu, Lavinia. “Clicks, Tweets, Links, and Other Global Actions: The Nature of Distributed Agency in Digital Environments.” Thinking Globally, Composing Locally: Rethinking Online Writing in the Age of the Global Internet, edited by Rich Rice and Kirk St. Amant, Utah State UP, 2018, pp. 257–77.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, Johndan, and Kimme Hea. “After Hypertext: Other Ideas.” Computers and Composition, vol. 20, 2003, pp. 415–25. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2003.08.014.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmbach, Jim. “Reading the Archives: Ten Years of Nonlinear (Kairos) History.” Kairos, vol. 11, no. 1, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Steven. “The Ethic of Expediency: Classical Rhetoric, Technology, and the Holocaust.” College English, vol. 54, no. 3, 1992, pp. 255–75. doi:10.2307/378062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuniavsky, Mike. Smart Things: Ubiquitous Computing User Experience Design. Elsevier, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of the Science Studies. Harvard UP, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford UP, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lillis, Theresa. “Ethnography as Method,Methodology, and ‘Deep Theorizing:’ Closing the Gap between Text and Context in Academic Writing Research.” Written Communication, vol. 25, 2008, pp. 353–88. doi:10.1177/0741088308319229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg, Christian, and Joshua Gunn. “‘Ouija Board, are There Any Communications?’ Agency, Ontotheology, and the Death of the Humanist Subject, Or, Continuing the ARS Conversation.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 83–105. doi:10.1080/02773940509391323.
   Google Scholar
• Micciche, Laura. “Writing Material.” College English, vol. 76, no. 6, 2014, pp. 488–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Carolyn. “What Can Automation Tell Us About Agency?” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 37, no. 2, 2007, pp. 137–57. doi:10.1080/02773940601021197.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. “Ontological Politics: A Word and Some Questions.” Actor Network Theory and After, edited by John Law and John Hassard, Blackwell Publishers, 1999, pp. 74–89.
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, Stacey. “Emplacing Mobile Composing Habits: A Study of Academic Writing in Networked Social Spaces.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 66, no. 2, 2014, pp. 250–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, Malea. “Down by the River, or How Susan La Flesche Picotte Can Teach Us about Alliance as a Practice of Survivance.” College English, vol. 67, no. 1, 2004, pp. 38–60. doi:10.2307/4140724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, Jeff. Digital Detroit: Rhetoric and Space in the Age of the Network. Southern Illinois UP, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rickert, Thomas. Ambient Rhetoric: The Attunements of Rhetorical Being. U of Pittsburgh P, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury, Lauren. “Just a Tool: Instructors’ Attitudes and Use of Course Management Systems for Online Writing Instruction.” Computers and Composition, vol. 48, 2018, pp. 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2018.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Elizabethada. “Rhetorical Spaces in Memorial Places: The Cemetery as a Rhetorical Memory Place/Space.” Rhetoric Society Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 4, 2005, pp. 51–81. doi:10.1080/02773940509391322.
   Google Scholar