Current Policies and Policy Efforts for the Education of Gifted Children in Turkey

REFERENCES

• Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi. (2011). Parti programi [The party program]. Retrieved from http://www.akparti.org.tr/parti-programi_79.html
   Google Scholar
• Baker, B. D. (2001a). Gifted children in the current policy and fiscal context of public education: A national snapshot and state-level equity analysis of texas. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 229–250. doi:10.3102/01623737023003229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, B. D. (2001b). Measuring the outcomes of state policies for gifted education: An equity analysis of Texas school districts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 4–15. doi:10.1177/001698620104500102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, B. D., & McIntire, J. (2003). Evaluating state funding for gifted education programs. Roeper Review, 25, 173–179. doi:10.1080/02783190309554225
   Google Scholar
• Basic Law of National Education, No. 1739.6. (1973). Retrieved from http://www.egitimmevzuat.com/index.php/20091122429/Kanun/mlli-etm-temel-kanunu-1739.html
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, W. E. (1968). Successful teachers of the gifted. Exceptional Children, 34, 317–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E., Avery, L., VanTassel-Baska, J., Worley, B. B., II, & Stambaugh, T. (2006). A five-state analysis of gifted education policies. Roeper Review, 29, 11–23. doi:10.1080/02783190609554379
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. (2011). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Çağlar, D. (2004). 1953–1993 Yılları Arasında Üstün Zekalı Çocuklar Konusunda Alınan Kararlar, Çalısmalar ve Uygulamalar [Works and decisions on topics related gifted students between years 1953 and 1993]. İstanbul, Turkey: Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi.
   Google Scholar
• Clinkenbeard, P. R., Kolloff, P. B., & Lord, W. E. (2007). A guide to state policies in gifted education. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
   Google Scholar
• Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Christensen, P., & Maxey, J. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and gifted high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 155–160. doi:10.1177/001698629303700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1992). Report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Gifted Education Policy Studies Program.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, M. R., & Gallagher, J. J. (1995). State identification policies: Gifted students from special populations. Roeper Review, 17, 268–275. doi:10.1080/02783199509553681
   Google Scholar
• Dağlıoğlu, H. E. (1995). İlkokul 2.–5. Sınıflara Devam Eden Çocuklar Arasından Üstün Yetenekli Olanların Belirlenmesi [Identification of talented children at the elementary level, grades 2–5] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (2005). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, R. M. (1970). Caring for the gifted. North Quincy, MA: Christopher.
   Google Scholar
• Enç, M. (1979). Özel eğitimin gerekçesi: Üstün beyin gücü, gelisimi ve eğitimleri [Rationale for special education: High intellectual power, development, and education]. Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Yayınları.
   Google Scholar
• First Congress on Turkish Talented Students. (2004a). Politika önerileri komisyonu ön raporu [Policy recommendation commission pre-report]. Ankara, Turkey: Çocuk Vakfı.
   Google Scholar
• First Congress on Turkish Talented Students. (2004b). Durum tesbiti ön raporu [Assessment pre-report]. Ankara, Turkey: Çocuk Vakfı.
   Google Scholar
• First Congress on Turkish Talented Students. (2004c). Politika ve strateji belirleme raporu [Policy and strategy determination report]. Ankara, Turkey: Çocuk Vakfı.
   Google Scholar
• Fithian, E. C. (2003). Rate of advanced placement (AP) exam taking among AP-enrolled students: A study of New Jersey high schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, D. Y. (2012). Ensuring equity in gifted education: Suggestions for change (again). Gifted Child Today, 35(1), 74–75. doi:10.1177/1076217511429672
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, F. C. (2004). Policy studies for educational leaders: An introduction (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. (2002). Society’s role in educating gifted students: The role of public policy. Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J., & Coleman, M. R. (1992). State policies on the identification of gifted students from special populations: Three states in profile. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J., & Coleman, M. R. (1994). Gifted education policy studies program final report. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Grand National Assembly of Turkey. (2012). Üstün yetenekli çocuklar: Meclis araştırması komisyonu raporu [Turkish parliamentary investigation commission’s report on the education of gifted students]. Ankara, Turkey: Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi [Grand National Assembly of Turkey].
   Google Scholar
• Howley, A., Howley, C. B., & Pendarvis, E. D. (1986). Teaching gifted children. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Ilhan, E. (2012). Educating Turks. The Cairo Review of Global Affairs, 4, 84–95.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, A. W. (2006). A comparative analysis of the curricular and programmatic features for gifted and talented students from two policy perspectives: England and California (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3233842)
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Landrum, M. S., Katsiyannis, A., & DeWaard, J. (1998). A national survey of current legislative and policy trends in gifted education: Life after the National Excellence report. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 352–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammadov, S. (2012). The education of gifted K–8 students in Turkey: Policy analysis and program evaluation (Unpublished master’s thesis). Bogazici University, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, D., & Foster, J. (2005). Being smart about gifted children: A guidebook for parents and educators. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 272–281. doi:10.1177/001698620304700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (1991). I. Özel eğitim konseyi, üstün yetenekli çocuklar ve eğitimleri [I Special education council, talented children and their education]. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Dairesi Baskanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (1997). Türkiyede Özel Eğitime muhtaç çocuklar ve eğitimleri [Gifted students who are in need of special education and their education in Turkey]. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2006). Özel eğitim hizmeti yönetmeliği [Special education regulation]. Ankara, Turkey: Resmi Gazete.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007a). Bilim ve sanat merkezleri yönergesi [BILSEMs regulations]. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2007b). Üstün zeka ve özel yetenekliler [Gifted and talented students]. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2011). Türkiye yeteneklerinin geliştirilmesi stratejisi ve uygulama planı 2012–2016 [Talent Development Strategy and Implementation Plan 2012–2016]. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. (2013). Özel yeteneklı bireyler stratejı ve uygulama planı 2013–2017 [Highly Talented Individuals Strategy and Implementation Plan 2013–2017]. Ankara, Turkey: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
   Google Scholar
• Passow, A. H. (2003). International perspectives on gifted education. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 528–535). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Passow, A. H., & Rudnitski, R. A. (1993). State policies regarding education of the gfted as reflected in legislation and regulation. Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented (CRS93302). Retrieved from http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/passrudn.html
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2004). Manual for Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Herbert, T. P., Diaz, E. P., Maxfield, L. R., & Ratley, M. E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school ( Research Monograph No. 95120). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center for the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1992). A general theory for the development of creative productivity in young people. In F. J. Mönks & W. A. M. Peters (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth world conference on gifted and talented children: Talent for the future (pp. 51–72). Maastricht, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd. ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richert, S. (2003). Excellence with justice in identification and programming. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook for gifted education (pp. 146–157). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, C. J., Harris, J. J., & Ford, D. Y. (1996). Gifted education and the law: A right, privilege, or superfluous? Roeper Review, 18, 179–182. doi:10.1080/02783199609553731
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, W. L., & Rivers, J. C. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future students’ academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (2000). A history of giftedness in school and society. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. F. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 23–53). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• We aim to nurture a pious generation. (2012, February). Hurriyet. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/19825231.asp
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Revised edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J. (2009). United States policy development in gifted education: A patchwork quilt. In L. V. Shavinia (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1295–1312). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• VanTassel-Baska, J., Patton, J., & Prillaman, D. (1991). Gifted youth at risk: A report of a national study. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
   Google Scholar
• Zirkel, P. (2005). State laws for gifted education: An overview of the legislation and regulations. Roeper Review, 27, 228–232. doi:10.1080/02783190509554323
   Google Scholar