Memories and Musings: My Experiences with Marcia Gentry and More

References

• Baum, S. (1988). An enrichment program for gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(1), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S., Owen, S., & Oreck, B. (1997). Transferring self-regulation processes from arts to academics. Arts Education Policy Review, 98(4), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.1997.9936393
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. M., Cooper, C. R., Neu, T. W., & Owen, S. V. (1995). Talent discovery assessment process users guide. Project High Hopes & Area Cooperative Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. M., Cooper, C. R., Neu, T. W., & Owen, S. V. (1997). Evaluation of Project High Hopes (Project No. R206A30159-95). U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Baum, S. M., Schader, R. M., & Hébert, T. P. (2014). Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent-focused approach for twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(4), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214547632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, C., Baum, S., & Neu, T. (2004). Developing scientific talent in students with special needs: An alternative model for identification, curriculum, and assessment. Journal for Secondary Gifted Education, XV(4), 162–169. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2004-456
   Google Scholar
• Emerick, L. J. (1992). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students’ perceptions of factors that reverse the pattern. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. (1996, Spring). Total school cluster grouping: An investigation of achievement and identification of elementary school students. University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. (1999). Promoting student achievement and exemplary classroom practices through cluster grouping: A research-based alternative to heterogeneous elementary classrooms (Research Monograph No. 99138). University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. (2017). Cluster grouping. In M. Callahan, L. Holly, & H. L. Hertberg-Davis (Eds.), Fundamentals of gifted education (pp. 213–224). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639987
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Fugate, C. M., Wu, J., & Castellano, J. (2014). Gifted Native American students—Literature, lessons, and future directions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214521660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Keilty, B. (2004). Rural and suburban cluster grouping: Reflections on staff development as a component of program success. Roeper Review, 4(26), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554260
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Neu, T. (1998). Project High Hopes summer institute: Curriculum for developing talent in students with special needs. Roeper Review, 20(4), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199809553912
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Owen, S. V. (2004). An investigation of the effects of total school cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. In S. M. Reis & L. E. Brody (Eds.), Grouping and acceleration practices (pp. 115–146). Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Peters, S. (2009). Effect sizes in gifted education research. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(3), 219–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209334976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. S., Gentry, M., McCoach, D. B., Worrell, F. C., Matthews, D., & Dixon, F. (2008). Evaluating the state of a field: Effect size reporting in gifted education. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.3200/JEXE.77.1.55-68
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olenchak, F. R. (1990). School change through gifted education: Effects on elementary students’ attitudes toward learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329001400108
   Google Scholar
• Oreck, B., Baum, S., & McCartney, H. (2000). Artistic talent development for urban youth: The promise and the challenge. University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
   Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Gentry, M. (1998). The application of enrichment clusters to teachers’ classroom practices. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21(3), 310–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329802100304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., & Peters, P. (2020). Research on the schoolwide enrichment model: Four decades of insights, innovation, and evolution. Gifted Education International, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420963987
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 21(2), 227–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698627702100216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2007). Enrichment Clusters for developing creativity and high-end learning. Gifted and Talented International, 22(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2007.11673484
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., & Reis, S. M. (2014). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real world, student-driven learning. Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Gentry, M., Reis, S. M., & Selyuk, E. (2006). Enrichment clusters: A practical plan for real-world, student-driven learning. VSUES Publishing House. (Original work published 2003)
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Gentry, M. (2014). Perceived effects of summer residential program on gifted Diné youth from low-income families. Journal of American Indian Education, 53(2), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaie.2014.a798531
   Google Scholar