Professor Marcia Gentry Walked the Talk

References

• ACT. (2013). ACT explore [Assessment instrument]. Author.
   Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., & Foley-Nicpon, M. (2021). Finding potential for talent development: Assessment of giftedness. In J. Van Tassel-Baska (Ed.), Talent development in gifted education (pp. 95–114). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., Ihrig, L. M., & Mahatmya, D. (2017). Closing the excellence gap: Investigation of an expanded talent search model for student selection into an extracurricular STEM program in rural middle schools. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(3), 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217701833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2012). The talent search model of gifted identification. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911433946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assouline, S. G., Mahatmya, D., Ihrig, L. M., Lynch, S., & Karakis, N. (2023). A theoretically based STEM talent development program that bridges excellence gaps. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1522(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14978
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boake, C. (2002). From the Binet–Simon to the Wechsler–Bellevue: Tracing the history of intelligence testing. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.3.383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borland, J. (2005). Myth 2: The gifted constitute 3% to 5% of the population. Moreover, giftedness equals high IA, which is a stable measure of aptitude. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(4), 236–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346825
   Google Scholar
• Borland, J. (2009). Gifted education without gifted programs or gifted students: Differentiation of curriculum and instruction as an instructional model for gifted students. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Eckert, & C. A. Little (Eds.), Systems and models for the education of the gifted and talented students (2nd ed., pp. 105–118). Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., & Oh, S. (2017). Describing the status of programs for the gifted: A call for action. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(1), 20–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216686215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carman, C. A., Walther, C. A. P., & Bartsch, R. A. (2018). Using the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT) 7 nonverbal battery to identify the gifted/talented: An investigation of demographic effects and norming plans. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 193–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, S. A. (2008). U.S. scientists’ role in the eugenics movement (1907–1939): A contemporary biologist’s perspective. Zebrafish, 5(4), 243–245. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2008.0576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley-Nicpon, M., & Assouline, S. G. (2020). High ability students with coexisting disabilities: Implications for school psychological practice. Psychology in the Schools, 57(10), 1615–1626. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. (2022). Excellence, equity, and talent development: Time to retire the g-word. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211054203
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Gray, A., Whiting, G. W., Maeda, Y., & Pereira, N. (2019). System failure/access denied. Gifted education in the United States: Laws, access, equity, and missingness across the country by locale, Title I school status, and race. Report Cards, Technical Report, and Website. Purdue University/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Owen, S. V. (1999). An investigation of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(4), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629904300402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Pereira, N., Peters, S., McIntosh, J., & Fugate, C. M. (2015). HOPE teacher rating scale: Involving teachers in equitable identification of gifted and talented students in K-12. Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Whiting, G., & Gray, A. M. (2022). Systemic inequities in identification and representation of Black youth with gifts and talents: Access, equity, and missingness in urban and other school locales. Urban Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420859221095000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginwright, S. A. (2022). The four pivots: Reimagining justice, reimagining ourselves. North Atlantic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ihrig, L. M., Assouline, S. G., Mahatmya, D., & Lynch, S. G. (2022). Developing Students’ science, technology, engineering, and mathematics talent in rural after-school settings: Rural educators’ affordances and barriers. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 45(4), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532221123786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakin, J. M. (2018). Making the cut in gifted selection: Score combination rules and their impact on program diversity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBeau, B., Assouline, S. G., Mahatmya, D., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2020). Differentiating among high-achieving learners: A comparison of classical test theory and item response theory on above-level testing. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(3), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220924050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. A., McCoach, D. B., Siegle, D., Callahan, C. M., & Gubbins, E. J. (2023). Inequality at the starting line: Underrepresentation in gifted identification and disparities in early achievement. AERA Open, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584231171535
   Google Scholar
• Marland, S. P., Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented (Vol 1): Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education [ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 056 243]. U.S. Congress. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED056243.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. S., & Plucker, J. A. (2022). What’s in a name? Rethinking “gifted” to promote equity and excellence. Gifted Education International, 38(3), 366–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211038988
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J., Gentry, M., Whiting, G. W., & McBee, M. T. (2019). Who gets served in gifted education? Demographic representation and a call for action. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(4), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986219833738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214534976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development. Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st Century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212444901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L. H., White, A. J., Callahan, C. M., Hartman, R. K., Westberg, M., Gavin, K., Reis, S. M., Siegle, D., & Sytsma, R. E. (2010). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students: Technical and administration manual (3rd ed.). Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rinn, A. N., Mun, R. U., & Hodges, J. (2022). 2020–2021 State of the states in gifted education. National Association for Gifted Children and the Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted.
   Google Scholar
• Rotigel, J. V., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (1999). Using talent searches to identify and meet the educational needs of mathematically talented youngsters. School Science and Mathematics, 99(6), 330–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17492.x
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. C. (2000). Helping students learn only what they don’t already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6(1), 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.1.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. C. (2005). A quiet revolution: Finding boys and girls who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verbally and helping them get the supplemental educational opportunities they need. High Ability Studies, 16(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130500115114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J. C., Keating, D. P., & Fox, L. (1974). Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Transformational giftedness: Rethinking our paradigm for gifted education. Roeper Review, 42(4), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1815266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas B. Fordham Institute. (June 2023). Building a wider, more diverse pipeline of advanced learners: Final report of the national working group on advanced education. https://fordhaminstitute.org/national/research/building-wider-more-diverse-pipeline-advanced-learners
   Google Scholar
• Warne, R. T. (2019). An evaluation (and vindication?) of Lewis Terman: What the father of gifted education can teach the 21st century. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218799433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, A. (2020). Achieving equity in gifted programming: Dismantling barriers and tapping potential. Prufrock Press.
   Google Scholar