What Matters is the Deployment, Not the Possession of Gifts: A Tribute to Marcia Gentry

References

• Allport, G. (1960). Becoming: Basic considerations for a psychology of personality. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1905). New methods for the diagnosis of the intellectual level of subnormals. In H. H. Goddard (Ed.), Development of intelligence in children (pp. 37–90). Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Houghton-Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Dobski, G. (2020, June 19). America is a republic, not a democracy. The Heritage Foundation. https://www.heritage.org/american-founders/report/america-republic-not-democracy
   Google Scholar
• Donnellan, K. (1972). Proper names and identifying descriptions. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 356–379). D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, O. K. (2020, November 9). What’s my vote worth? Medium. https://medium.com/practical-coding/whats-my-vote-worth-3ca2585b5d51
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Altham, J. E. J. (1973). The causal theory of names. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary, 47, 187–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/aristoteliansupp/47.1.187
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations. Psychological Bulletin, 101(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R. (2011). Secular changes in intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg & S. B. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of intelligence (pp. 647–665). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977244.033
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, J. R. (2012). Are we getting smarter? Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139235679
   Google Scholar
• Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00687.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugate, C. M., & Gentry, M. (2015). Understanding adolescent gifted girls with ADHD: Motivated and achieving. High Ability Studies, 27(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1098522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugate, C. M., Zentall, S. S., & Gentry, M. (2013). Creativity and working memory in gifted students with and without characteristics of attention deficit hyperactive disorder: Lifting the mask. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(4), 234–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986213500069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, F. (2020). Differentiating giftedness from talent. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (Rev. ed.). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, M. (2009). A comprehensive continuum of gifted education and talent development services: Discovering, developing, and enhancing young people’s gifts and talents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 262–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209346937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Desmet, O., Karami, S., Lee, H., Green, C., Sharp, A., Chowkase, A., & Gray, A. (2021). Gifted education’s legacy of high stakes ability testing: Using measures for identification that perpetuate inequity. Roeper Review, 43(4), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., & Fugate, C. M. (2012). Gifted native American students: Underperforming, under-identified, and overlooked. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 631–646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.21624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentry, M., Fugate, C. M., Wu, J., & Castellano, J. (2014). Gifted Native American students—Literature, lessons, and future directions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(2), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214521660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, L. S. (1997). Why g matters: The complexity of everyday life. Intelligence, 24(1), 79–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2896(97)90014-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Haier, R. J. (2020). Biological approaches to intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 139–173). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1988). Thinking about human abilities. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 645–685). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, A. S., Schneider, W. J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). Psychometric approaches to studying intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 67–103). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig, K. A., Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2007.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kripke, S. (1979). A puzzle about belief. In A. Margalit (Ed.), Meaning and use (pp. 239–283). D. Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D. (2016). From Terman to today: A century of findings on intellectual precocity. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 900–944. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316675476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2021). Intellectual precocity: What have we learned since Terman? Gifted Child Quarterly, 65(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220925447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackintosh, N. (2011). IQ and human intelligence (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, issues (2nd ed., pp. 136–181). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, R., & Gentry, M. (2010). Developing talents among high-potential students from low-income families in an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal for Advanced Academics, 21, 594–627.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R., & Gentry, M. (2013). Commentary on “A quality of giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 27(2), 47–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2012.11673635
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, N., & Gentry, M. (2013). A qualitative inquiry into the experiences of gifted English language learners in Midwestern, elementary schools. Journal for Advanced Academics, 24(3), 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13494204
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J., & Gentry, M. (2010). Multi-group construct validity evidence of the HOPE scale: Instrumentation to identify low-income elementary students for gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986210378332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J., & Gentry, M. (2012). Group specific norms and teacher rating scales: Implications for underrepresentation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12438717
   Google Scholar
• Peters, S. J., & Gentry, M. (2013). Additional validity evidence and across-group equivalency of the HOPE teacher rating scale. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57(2), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212469253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1973). Meaning and reference. Journal of Philosophy, 70(19), 699–711.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (1983). Realism and reason. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., Koehler, J., & Fogarty, E. (2006). Operation Houndstooth intervention theory: Social capital in today’s schools. Gifted Child Today, 29(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.4219/gct-2006-189
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997a). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence. Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997b). The schoolwide enrichment model: New directions for developing high-end learning. In N. Colangelo & G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 136–154). Creative Learning Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2021). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A change in direction from being gifted to the development of gifted behaviors. In R. J. Sternberg & D. Ambrose (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness and talent (pp. 335–356). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, D. (2020, December 14). Why was the electoral college created? History. https://www.history.com/news/electoral-college-founding-fathers-constitutional-convention
   Google Scholar
• Sackett, P. R., Shewach, O. R., & Dahlke, J. A. (2020). The predictive value of general intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Human intelligence: An introduction (pp. 381–414). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spearman, C. (1904). ‘General intelligence,’ objectively determined and measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2010). College admissions for the 21st century. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2017). ACCEL: A new model for identifying the gifted. Roeper Review, 39(3), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2017.1318658
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2021a). Adaptive intelligence: Surviving and thriving in a world of uncertainty. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2021b, April 29). Identification for utilization, not merely possession, of gifts: What matters is not gifts but rather deployment of gifts. Gifted Education International https://doi.org/10.1177/02614294211013345
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2022). Transformational giftedness: Who’s got it and who does not? In R. J. Sternberg, D. Ambrose, & S. Karami (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of transformational giftedness for education (pp. 355–371). Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (2023). Evolving implicit metaphors for understanding giftedness: From banks to foundations. Roeper Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2023.2212617
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Ambrose, D. (Eds.). (2021). Conceptions of giftedness and talent. Palgrave–Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Desmet, O. A., Ford, D., Gentry, M. L., Grantham, T., & Karami, S. (2021). The legacy: Coming to terms with the origins and development of the gifted-child movement. Roeper Review, 43(4), 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2021.1967544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Glück, J. (2022). Wisdom: The psychology of wise thoughts, words, and deeds. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Preiss, D. D., & Karami, S. (2023). An historical causal-chain theory of conceptions of intelligence. Review of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680231158790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Reis, S. M. (Eds.). (2004). Definitions and conceptions of giftedness. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., Wong, C. H., & Sternberg, K. (2019). The relation of tests of scientific reasoning to each other and to tests of fluid intelligence. Journal of Intelligence, 7(3), 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence7030020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subotnik, R. (2003). A developmental view of giftedness: From being to doing. Roeper review, 26(1), 14–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190309554233
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon intelligence scale. Houghton Mifflin. https://doi.org/10.1037/10014-000
   Google Scholar
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Genetic studies of genius (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (2008). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006). Beyond g: Putting multiple intelligence theory of the test. Intelligence, 34(5), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Stumm, S., & Plomin, R. (2015). Socioeconomic status and the growth of intelligence from infancy through adolescence. Intelligence, 48, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., & Gentry, M. (2014). Perceived effects of summer residential program on gifted Diné youth from low-income families. Journal of American Indian Education, 53(2), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/jaie.2014.a798531
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., & Gentry, M. (2012). Some thoughts on “Cultural variation and dominance in a globalized knowledge-economy.” Towards a cultural-sensitive research paradigm in the science of giftedness. Gifted and Talented International, 27(1), 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2012.11673618
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Gentry, M., & Choi, Y. O. (2012). Gifted students’ perceptions of the regular classes and pull-out programs in South Korea. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(3), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X12451021
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., & Gentry, M. (2009). Racial and ethnic representation in gifted programs: Current status of and implications for gifted Asian American students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(2), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208330564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar