An Instrument for the Classification of Aerosols by Particle Relaxation Time: Theoretical Models of the Aerodynamic Aerosol Classifier

REFERENCES

• Chein , H. and Lundgren , D. A. 1993 . Virtual Impactor with Clean Air Core for the Generation of Aerosols with Narrow Size Distributions . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 18 : 376 – 388 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner , W. D. 1966 . An Inertial-Type Particle Separator for Collecting Large Samples . J. Air Poll. Control Assoc. , 16 : 1 – 35 .
   Google Scholar
• DeCarlo , P. F. , Slowik , J. G. , Worsnop , D. R. , Davidovits , P. and Jimenez , J. L. 2004 . Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 38 : 1185 – 1205 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehara , K. 1995 . “ Aerosol Mass Spectrometer and Method of Classifying Aerosol Particles According to Specificmass ” . U.S. Patent No. 5,428, 220
   Google Scholar
• Ehara , K. , Hagwood , C. and Coakley , K. J. 1996 . Novel Method to Classify Aerosol Particles According to Their Mass-to-Charge Ratio – Aerosol Particle Mass Analyser . J. Aerosol Sci. , 27 ( 2) : 217 – 234 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flagan , R. C. 2004 . Opposed Migration Aerosol Classifier (OMAC) . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 38 : 890 – 899 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlander , S. 2000 . Smoke, Dust and Haze , Oxford University Press, New York .
   Google Scholar
• Gallis , M. A. , Torczynski , J. R. and Rader , D. J. 2008 . Nonzero-Concentration Boundary Condition for Advection–Diffusion Aerosol-Transport Modeling . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 42 ( 10 ) : 829 – 831 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz , A. 1957 . An Instrument for the Quantitative Separation and Size Classification of Airborne Particulate Matter Down to 0.2 Micron . Geofis. Pura Appl. , 36 : 49 – 69 .
   Google Scholar
• Hinds , W. C. 1999 . Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles , New York : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Hoppel , W. A. 1978 . Determination of the Aerosol Size Distribution from the Mobility Distribution of the Charged Fraction of Aerosols . J. Aerosol Sci. , 9 ( 1 ) : 41 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez , J. L. , Jayne , J. T. , Shi , Q. , Kolb , C. E. , Worsnop , D. R. Yourshaw , I. 2003 . Ambient Aerosol Sampling with an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer . J. Geophys. Res.–Atmos. , 108 ( D7 ) : 8425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinen , J. , Pietarinen , K. and Lehtimaki , M. 1992 . Electrical Low Pressure Impactor . J. Aerosol Sci. , 23 ( 4) : 353 – 360 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler , D. and Kruis , F. E. 2012 . Feasibility Study of a Differential Aerodynamic Diameter Analyzer , Granada, Spain : European Aerosol Conference .
   Google Scholar
• Knutson , E. O. and Whitby , K. T. 1975 . Aerosol Classification by Electric mobility: Apparatus, Theory, Andapplications . J. Aerosol Sci. , 6 : 443 – 451 .
   Google Scholar
• Liu , P. , Ziemann , P. J. , Kittelson , D. B. and McMurry , P. H. 1995a . Generating Particle Beams of Controlled Dimensions and Divergence. 1. Theory of Particle Motion in Aerodynamic Lenses and Nozzle Expansions . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 22 : 293 – 313 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu , P. , Ziemann , P. J. , Kittelson , D. B. and McMurry , P. H. 1995b . Generating Particle Beams of Controlled Dimensions and Divergence. 2. Experimental Evaluation of Particle Motion in Aerodynamic Lenses Andnozzle Expansions . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 22 : 314 – 324 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marple , V. A. , Rubow , K. L. and Behm , S. M. 1991 . A Microorifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI): Description, Calibration, and Use . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 14 : 434 – 446 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumder , M. K. and Kirsch , K. J. 1977 . Single Particle Aerodynamic Relaxation Time Analyzer . Rev. Sci. Instr. , 48 : 622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meseguer , A. and Marques , F. 2002 . On the Competition Between Centrifugal and Shear Instability in Spiral Poiseuille Flow . J. Fluid Mech. , 455 : 129 – 148 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfert , J. and Collings , N. 2005 . New Method for Particle Mass Classification—The Couette Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer . J. Aerosol Sci. , 36 : 1338 – 1352 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer , K. F. and Walton , W. H. 1950 . The ‘Conifuge’ – A Size-separating Sampling Device for Airborne Particles . J. Scient. Instrum. , 27 : 272
   Google Scholar
• Smith , G. D. 1978 . Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods , Oxford University Press, New York .
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg , M. R. 1988 . An Ultrafine Aerosol Size Distribution Measuring System , PhD Thesis, University of Minnesota .
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg , M. R. and McMurry , P. H. 2008 . Equations Governing Single and Tandem DMA Configurations and a New Lognormal Approximation to the Transfer Function . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 42 ( 6 ) : 421 – 432 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöber , W. and Flachsbart , H. 1969 . Size Separating Precipitation of Aerosols in a Spinning Spiral Duct . Environ. Sci. Technol. , 3 : 1280 – 1296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli , F. , Mitra , S. K and Olfert , J. S. 2011 . Aerosol Penetration in Microchannels . J. Aerosol Sci. , 42 ( 5 ) : 321 – 328 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang , S. C. and Flagan , R. C. 1990 . Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer . Aerosol Sci. Technol. , 13 : 230 – 240 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , J. C. and Liu , B. Y. H. 1980 . Aerodynamic Particle Size Measurement by Laser-Dopplervelocimetry . J. Aerosol Sci. , 11 ( 2 ) : 139 – 150 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar