Real-time effective density monitor (DENSMO) for aerosol nanoparticle production

References

• Aitken, R. J., Chaudhry, M. Q., Boxall, A. B. A., and Hull, M. (2006). Manufacture and Use of Nanomaterials: Current Status in the UK and Global Trends. Occup. Med., 56:300–306. doi:10.1093/occmed/kql051.
   Google Scholar
• Arffman, A., Marjamäki, M., and Keskinen, J. (2011). Simulation of Low Pressure Impactor Collection Efficiency Curves. J. Aerosol Sci., 42:329–340. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arffman, A., Yli-Ojanperä, J., Kalliokoski, J., Harra, J., Pirjola, L., Karjalainen, P., Rönkkö, T., and Keskinen, J. (2014). High-Resolution Low-pressure Cascade Impactor. J. Aerosol Sci., 78:97–109. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CRC (2009). CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (Internet Version 2009). 89th ed. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
   Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Dovidovits, P., and Jimenez, J. L. (2004). Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38:1185–1205. doi:10.1080/027868290903907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzubay, T. G., and Hasan, H. (1990). Fitting Multimodal Lognormal Size Distributions to Cascade Impactor Data. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 13:144–150. doi:10.1080/02786829008959432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehara, K., Hagwood, C., and Coakley, K. J. (1996). Novel Method to Classify Aerosol Particle According to Their Mass-to-Charge Ratio—Aerosol Particle Mass Analyser. J. Aerosol Sci., 27:217–234. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(95)00562-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, N. A. (1964). The Mechanics of Aerosols. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Harra, J., Juuti, P., Haapanen, J., Sorvali, M., Roumeli, E., Honkanen, M., Vippola, M., Yli-Ojanperä, J., and Mäkelä, J. M. (2015). Coating of Silica and Titania Aerosol Nanoparticles by Silver Vapor Condensation. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49:767–776. doi:10.1080/02786826.2015.1072263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering, S. V., and Stolzenburg, M. R. (1995). On-line Determination of Particle Size and Density in the Nanometer Size Range. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 23:155–173. doi:10.1080/02786829508965301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W. (1999). Aerosol Technology. Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, p. 483
   Google Scholar
• Järvinen, A., Aitomaa, M., Rostedt, A., Keskinen, J., and Yli-Ojanperä, J. (2014). Calibration of the New Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI+). J. Aerosol Sci., 69:150–159. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, W. P., and McMurry, P. H. (1992). Measurement of Particle Density by Inertial Classification of Differential Mobility Analyzer-Generated Monodisperse Aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 17:199–212. doi:10.1080/02786829208959571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinen, J., Pietarinen, K., and Lehtimäki, M. (1992). Electrical Low Pressure Impactor. J. Aerosol Sci., 23:353–360. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(92)90004-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen, H., Arffman, A., Saukko, E., Virtanen, A., and Keskinen, J. (2013). A New Method for Characterizing the Bounce and Charge Transfer Properties of Nanoparticles. J. Aerosol Sci., 55:104–115. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, M., Gudmundsson, A., Pagels, J. H., Fierz, M., Mølhave, K., Löndahl, J., Jensen, I. K., and Koponen, K. A. (2015). Limitations in the Use of Unipolar Charging for Electrical Mobility Sizing Instruments: A Study of the Fast Mobility Particle Sizer. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49:556–565. doi:10.1080/02786826.2015.1052039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjamäki, M., and Keskinen, J. (2004). Effect of Impaction Plate Roughness and Porosity on Collection Efficiency. J. Aerosol Sci., 35:301–308. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjamäki, M., Keskinen, J., Chen, D.-R., and Pui, D. Y. H. (2000). Performance Evaluation of the Electrical Low-pressure Impactor. J. Aerosol Sci., 31:249–261. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00052-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjamäki, M., Ntziachristos, L., Virtanen, A., Ristimäki, J., Keskinen, J., Moisio, M., Palonen, M., and Lappi, M. (2002). Electrical Filter Stage for the ELPI. Technical Report SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0055. doi:10.4271/2002-01-0055.
   Google Scholar
• McMurry, P. H., Wang, X., Park, K., and Ehara, K. (2002). The Relationship Between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particle: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 36:227–238. doi:10.1080/027868202753504083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfert, J., and Collings, N. (2005). New Method for Particle Mass Classification—The Coulette Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer. J. Aerosol Sci., 36:1338–1352. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, A. K., and Whitby, K. T. (1978a). Non-ideal Collection Characteristics of Inertial Impactors–I. Single-stage impactors and solid particles. J. Aerosol Sci., 9:77–86. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(78)90069-1.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, A. K., and Whitby, K. T. (1978b). Non-ideal Collection Characteristics of Inertial Impactors–II. Cascade impactors. J. Aerosol Sci., 9:87–100. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(78)90070-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ristimäki, J., Virtanen, M., Marjamäki, A., Rostedt, A., and Keskinen, J. (2002). On-line Measurement of Size Distribution and Effective Density of Submicron Aerosol Particles. J. Aerosol Sci., 33:1541–1557. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00106-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rostedt, A., Marjamäki, M., and Keskinen, J. (2009). Modification of the ELPI to Measure Mean Particle Effective Density in Real-Time. J. Aerosol Sci., 40:823–831. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Shin, W. G., Mertler, M., Sachweh, B., Fissan, H., and Pui, D. Y. H. (2010). Measurement of Nanoparticle Agglomerates by Combined Measurement of Electrical Mobility and Unipolar Charging Properties. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 44:97–108. doi:10.1080/02786820903401427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. C., and Flagan, R. C. (1990). Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer. J. Aerosol Sci., 13:230–240. doi:10.1080/02786829008959441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weis, F., Seipenbusch, M., and Kasper, G. (2015). Coating Thickness Measurements on Gas-Borne Nanoparticles by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Spectrometry. J. Nanopart. Res., 17:39. doi:10.1007/s11051-014-2824-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yli-Ojanperä, J., Mäkelä, J. M., Marjamäki, A., Rostedt, M., and Keskinen, J. (2010). Towards Traceable Particle Number Concentration Standard: Single Charged Aerosol Reference (SCAR). J. Aerosol Sci., 40:719–728. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.04.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelenyuk, A., Cai, J., Chieffo, L., and Imre, D. (2005). High Precision Density Measurements of Single Particles: The Density of Metastable Phases. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39:972–986. doi:10.1080/02786820500380206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelenyuk, A., and Imre, D. (2005). Single Particle Laser Ablation Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer: An Introduction to SPLAT. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 39:554–568. doi:10.1080/027868291009242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelenyuk, A., Yang, J., Choi, E., and Imre, D. (2009). SPLAT II: An Aircraft Compatible, Ultra-sensitive, High Precision Instrument for In-situ Characterization of the Size and Composition of Fine and Ultrafine Particles. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43:411–424. doi:10.1080/02786820802709243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar