How well can aerosol instruments measure particulate mass and solid particle number in engine exhaust?

References

• Awasthi, A., Wu, B. S., Liu, C. N., Chen, C. W., Uang, S. N., and Tsai, C. J. (2013). The Effect of Nanoparticle Morphology on the Measurement Accuracy of Mobility Particle Sizers. MAPAN, 28:205–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougher, T. L., Khalek, I. A., Laroo, C. A., and Bishnu, D. K. (2012). Determination of the PEMS Measurement Allowance for PM Emissions Regulated Under the Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine in-Use Testing Program. SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1250.
   Google Scholar
• California Air Resources Board (2015). Amendments to the Low-Emission Vehicle Program – LEV III. Available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/levprog/leviii/leviii.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cavina, N., Poggio, L., Bedogni, F., Rossi, V., and Stronati, L. (2013). Benchmark Comparison of Commercially Available Systems for Particle Number Measurement. SAE Technical Paper 2013-24-0182.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, R. E., Duszkiewicz, G. J., Richert, J. F. O., Lewis, D., Maricq, M. M., and Xu, N. (2004). PM Measurement Artifact: Organic Vapor Deposition on Different Filter Media. SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0967.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency (2015). Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40: Protection of Environment, Part 1066: Vehicle-Testing Procedures. Available at http://cfr.regstoday.com/40cfr1066.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Forestieri, S. D., Collier, S., Kuwayama, T., Zhang, Q., Kleeman, M. J., and Cappa, C. D. (2013). Real-Time Black Carbon Emission Factor Measurements From Light Duty Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47:13104–13112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., Mamakos, A., Andersson, J., Dilara, P., Martini, G., Schindler, W., and Bergmann, A. (2012). Measurement of Automotive Non-Volatile Particle Number Emissions Within the European Legislative Framework: A Review. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46:719–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, S. J., and Maricq, M. M. (2001). Signature Size Distributions for Diesel and Gasoline Engine Exhaust Particulate Matter. J. Aerosol Sci., 32:749–764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., Caldow, R., Poecher, A., Mirme, A., and Kittelson, D. (2004). A New Electrical Mobility Particle Sizer Spectrometer for Engine Exhaust Particle Measurements. SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-1341.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, H., Johnson, K. C., Russell, R. L., Durbin, T. D., Miller, W., Xue, E. J., Swanson, J., and Kittelson, D. (2015). Very Low PM Mass Measurements. Coordinating Research Council Project E-99. Available at http://www.crcao.org/reports / recentstudies2015 / E-99/CRC_ARB%20Final%20Report_E-99_v15d%20REVISED%202015_09_25.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Keskinen, J. and Rönkkö, T. (2010). Can Real-World Diesel Exhaust Particle Size Distribution be Reproduced in the Laboratory? A Critical Review. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 60:1245–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalek, I. A., Bougher, T., and Jetter, J. J. (2010). Particle Emissions From a 2009 Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Using Different Commercially Available Fuels. SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-2117.
   Google Scholar
• Khalek, I. A., Kittelson, D. B. and Brear, F. (2000). Nanoparticle Growth During Dilution and Cooling of Diesel Exhaust: Experimental Investigation and Theoretical Assessment. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0515.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. Y., Johnson, K. C., Durbin, T. D., Jung, H., Cocker, D. R., Bishnu, D., and Giannelli, R. (2012). Characterization of PM-PEMS for in-Use Measurements Conducted During Validation Testing for the PM-PEMS Measurement Allowance Program. Atmos. Environ., 55:311–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittelson, D., Hands, T., Nickolaus, C., Collings, N., Niemela, V., and Twigg, M. (2006). Mass Correlation of Engine Emissions with Spectral Instruments. Trans. Soc. Automot. Eng. Jpn, 37:67.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, U., Niemelä, V., and Mohr, M. (2004). New Method for Time-Resolved Diesel Engine Exhaust Particle Mass Measurement. Environ. Sci. Technol., 38:5704–5711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamakos, A., Ntziachristos, L., and Samaras, Z. (2006). Evaluation of the Dekati Mass Monitor for the Measurement of Exhaust Particle Mass Emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol., 40:4739–4745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maricq, M. M. (2014). Examining the Relationship Between Black Carbon and Soot in Flames and Engine Exhaust. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48:620–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maricq, M. M., Podsiadlik, D. H., and Chase, R. E. (1999). Examination of the Size Resolved and Transient Nature of Particle Emissions From Motor Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol., 33:1618–1626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maricq, M. M. and Xu, N. (2004), The Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Soot Particles From Premixed Flames and Motor Vehicle Exhaust. J. Aerosol Sci., 35:1251–1274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjamäki, M., Keskinen, J., Chen, D.-R., and Pui, D. Y. H. (2000). Performance Evaluation of the Electrical Low-Pressure Impactor (ELPI). J. Aerosol Sci., 31:249–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirme, A., Noppel, M., Peil, I., Salm, J., Tamm, E., and Tammet, H. (1984). Multi-Channel Electric Aerosol Spectrometer, in Intern. Comm. for Cloud Phys. 11th Intern. Conf. on Atmosphere Aerosols, Condensation and Ice Nuclei, (SEE N85–32596 21–47), Vol. 2, pp. 155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Olfert, J. S., Symonds, J. P. R., and Collings, N. (2007). The Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Particles Emitted from a Light-Duty Diesel Vehicle with a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst, J. Aerosol Sci., 38:69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H. (2003). Relationship Between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles. Environ. Sci. Technol., 37:577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peckham, M. S., Finch, A., Campbell, B., Price, P., and Davies, M. T. (2011). Study of Particle Number Emissions from a Turbocharged Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Engine Including Data from a Fast-Response Particle Size Spectrometer. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1224.
   Google Scholar
• Petzold, A., Marsh, R., Johnson, M., Miller, M., Sevcenco, Y., Delhaye, D., Ibrahim, A., Williams, P., Bauer, H., Crayford, A., Bachalo, W. D. and Raper, D. (2011). Evaluation of Methods for Measuring Particulate Matter Emissions from Gas Turbines. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45:3562–3568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A. and Zhang, X.-Y. (2013). Recommendations for Reporting “Black Carbon” Measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13:8365–8379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, P., Stone, R., Collier, T., Davies, M., and Scheer, V. (2006). Dynamic Particulate Measurements From a DISI Vehicle: A Comparison of DMS500, ELPI, CPC and PASS. SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-1077.
   Google Scholar
• Reavell, K., Hands, T., and Collings, N. (2002). A Fast Response Particulate Spectrometer for Combustion Aerosols. SAE Technical Paper 2002–01-2714.
   Google Scholar
• Rubino, L., Bonnel, P., Carriero, M., and Krasenbrink, A. (2009). Portable Emission Measurement System (PEMS) for Heavy Duty Diesel Vehicle PM Measurement: The European PM PEMS Program. SAE Technical Paper 2009-24-0149.
   Google Scholar
• Sardar, S. B., Zhang, S., Larsen, L., Chang, M.-C. O., and McMahon, W. (2015). Evaluation of PM Measurement Precision and the Equivalency of the Single Filter and 3 Filter Sampling Methods in LEV III, 25'th CRC Real World Emissions Workshop, Long Beach.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, W., Haisch, C., Beck, H. A., Niessner, R., Jacob, E., and Rothe, D. (2004). A Photoacoustic Sensor System for Time Resolved Quantification of Diesel Soot Emissions. SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0968.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, W. G., Wang, J., Mertler, M., Sachweh, B., Fissan, H., and Pui, D. Y. H. (2010). The Effect of Particle Morphology on Unipolar Diffusion Charging of Nanoparticle Agglomerates in the Transition Regime. J. Aerosol Sci., 41:975–986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelling, D. R., Smallwood, G. J., Liu, F., Gülder, Ö. L., and Bachalo, W. D. (2005). A Calibration-Independent Laser-Induced Incandescence Technique for Soot Measurement by Detecting Absolute Light Intensity. Appl. Optics, 44:6773–6785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symonds, J. P. R., Reavell, K. St. J., Olfert, J. S., Campbell, B. W., and Swift, S. J. (2007). Diesel Soot Mass Calculation in Real-Time with a Differential Mobility Spectrometer. J. Aerosol Sci., 38:52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tammet, H., Mirme, A., and Tamm, E. (2002). Electrical Aerosol Spectrometer of Tartu University. Atmos. Res., 62:315–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN/ECE Regulation 83. (2011). United Nations – Economic Commissions for Europe, Regulation no. 83, Revision 4, 26 April 2011, Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to the emissions of pollutants according to engine fuel requirements.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. L., Grose, M. A., Avenido, A., Stolzenburg, M. R., Caldow, R., Osmondson, B. L., Chow, J. C., and Watson, J. G. (2016a). Improvement of Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer (EEPS) Size Distribution Measurement - I. Algorithm and Applications to Compact Aerosols. J. Aerosol Sci., 92:95–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X. L., Grose, M. A., Caldow, R., Osmondson, B. L., Swanson, J. J., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Kittelson, D. B., Li, Y., Xue, J., Jung, H., and Hu, S. (2016b). Improvement of Engine Exhaust Particle Sizer (EEPS) Size Distribution Measurement – II. Engine Exhaust Aerosols. J. Aerosol Sci., 92:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, J., Li, Y., Wang, X., Durbin, T. D., Johnson, K. C., Karavalakis, G., Asa-Awuku, A., Villela, M., Quiros, D., Hu, S., Huai, T., Ayala, A., and Jung, H. (2015). Comparison of Vehicle Exhaust Particle Size Distributions Measured by SMPS and EEPS During Steady-State Conditions. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49:984–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zervas, E., and Dorlhène, P. (2006). Comparison of Exhaust Particle Number Measured by EEPS, CPC, and ELPI. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40:977–984.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar