Engineered nanomaterials exposure in the production of graphene

References

• Allen, M. J., Tung, V. C., and Kaner, R. B. (2010). Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene. Chem. Rev., 110(1):132–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbach, C., Kaminski, H., Von Barany, D., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Monz, C., Dziurowitz, N., Pelzer, J., Vossen, K., Berlin, K., Dietrich, S., Götz, U., Kiesling, H. J., Scierl, R., and Dahmann, D. (2012b). Comparability of Portable Nanoparticle Exposure Monitors. Ann. Occ. Hyg., 56(5):606–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asbach, C., Kuhlbusch, T., Kaminski, H., Stahlmecke, B., Plitzko, S., Götz, U., Voetz, M., Kiesling, H. J., and Dahmann, D. (2012a). NanoGEM Standard Operation Procedures for Assessing Exposure to Nanomaterials, Following a Tiered Approach. Available at httv://www.nanosem.de/cms/nanosem/uvload/Veroeffentlichungen/nanoGEM.SOPs.TieredApproach.pdf (last accessed 03/04/2016).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM: American Society of Testing and Materials. (2000). ASTM Standard Practice for Controlling and Characterizing Errors in Weighing Collected Aerosols (ASTM D 6552). ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Berges, M. G. M. (2013). Exposure during Production and Handling of Manufactured Nanomaterials, in Nanomaterials, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), ed., Wiley-VCH Verlag. GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, pp. 1–94. doi: 10.1002/9783527673919.ch2.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, A. (2013). All in the Graphene Family - A Recommended Nomenclature for Two-dimensional Carbon Materials. Carbon, 65:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D., Berges, M., Virji, M. A., Fransman, W., Bello, D., Hodson, L., Gabriel, S., and Tielemans, E. (2012). Harmonization of Measurement Strategies for Exposure to Manufactured Nano-objects; Report of a Workshop. Ann. Occup. Hyg., 56(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D., van Duuren-Stuurman, B., Berges, M., Jankowska, E., Bard, D., and Mark, D. (2009). From Workplace Air Measurement Results Toward Estimates of Exposure? Development of a Strategy to Assess Exposure to Manufactured Nano-Objects. J. Nanopart. Res., 11(8):1867–1881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, R., Jongeneelen, F., van Broekhuizen, P., and van Broekhuizen, F. (2012). Guidance Working Safely with Nanomaterials and –Products, the Guide for Employers and Employees. FNV, VNO/NCW, CNV. Available online at http://www.ivam.uva.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/guidance-safeworkingwithnano.pdf (accessed 6 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• De, M., Chou, S. S., and Dravid, V. P. (2011). Graphene Oxide as an Enzyme Inhibitor: Modulation of Activity of Alpha-chymotrypsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 133(44):17524–17527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierz, M., Houle, C., Steigmeier, P., and Burtscher, H. (2011). Design, Calibration, and Field Performance of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C. X., Yang, H. B., Sheng, Z. M., Lu, Z. S., Song, Q. L., and Li, C. M. (2010). Layered Graphene/quantum Dots for Photovoltaic Devices. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 49(17):3014–3017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., and Zhou, Q. (2013). Health and Ecosystem Risks of Graphene. Chem. Rev., 113(5):3815–3835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRP. (1994). Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66. Ann. ICRP 24 (1–3) Pergamon Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Jang, B. Z., and Zhamu, A. (2008). Processing of Nanographene Platelets (NGPs) and NGP Nanocomposites: A Review. J. Mater. Sci., 43:5092–5101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. C. Ø., Levin, M., Koivisto, A. J., Kling, K. I., Saber, A. T., and Koponen, I. K. (2015). Exposure Assessment of Particulate Matter from Abrasive Treatment of Carbon and Glass Fibre-reinforced Epoxy-composites - Two Case Studies. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 15(5):1906–1916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaluza, S., Balderhaar, J. K., Orthen, B., Honnert, B., Jankowska, E., Pietrowsk, P., Rosell, M. G., Tanarro, C., Tejedor, J., and Zugasti, A. (2009). Literature Review. in Workplace Exposure to Nanoparticles, J. Kosk-Bienko, ed., European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), Spain, pp. 1–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski, H., Kuhlbusch, T. A., Rath, S., Götz, U., Sprenger, M., Wels, D., Polloczek, J., Bachmann, V., Dziurowitz, N., Kiesling, H. J., Schwiegelshohn, A., Monz, C., Dahmann, D., and Asbach, C. (2013). Comparability of Mobility Particle Sizers and Diffusion Chargers. J. Aerosol Sci., 57:156–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, A. J., ACØ, J., Levin, M., Kling, K. I., Dal Maso, M., Nielsen, S. H., Jensen, K. A., and Koponen, I. K. (2015). Testing a Near Field/Far Field Model Performance for Prediction of Particulate Matter Emissions in a Paint Factory. Environ. Sci. Process Impacts, 17:62–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, A. J., Aromaa, M., JM, M., Pasanen, P., Hussein, T., and Hämeri, K. (2012a). Concept to Estimate Regional Inhalation Dose of Industrially Synthesized Nanoparticles. ACS Nano, 6:1195–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, A. J., Lyyränen, J., Auvinen, A., Vanhala, E., Hämeri, K., Tuomi, T., and Jokiniemi, J. (2012b). Industrial Worker Exposure to Airborne Particles During the Packing of Pigment and Nanoscale Titanium Dioxide. Inhal. Toxicol., 24:839–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto, A. J., Palomäki, J. E., Viitanen, A.-K., Siivola, K. M., Koponen, I. K., Mingzhou, Y., Kanerva, T., Norppa, H., Alenius, H. T., Hussein, T., Savolainen, K. M., and Hämeri, K. (2014). Range-Finding Risk Assessment of Inhalation Exposure to Nanodiamonds in a Laboratory Environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 11:5382–5402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koponen, I. K., Koivisto, A. J., and Jensen, K. A. (2015). Worker Exposure and High Time-resolution Analyses of Process-related Dust Concentrations at Mixing Stations in Two Paint Factories. Ann. Occ. Hyg. 56(6):749–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuempel, E. D., Geraci, C. L., and Schulte, P. A. (2012). Risk Assessment and Risk Management of Nanomaterials in the Workplace: Translating Research to Practice. Ann. Occ. Hyg., 56(5):491–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Asbach, C., Fisaan, H., Göhler, D., and Stints, M. (2011). Nanoparticle Exposure at Nanotechnology Workplaces: A Review. Part Fibre Toxicol., 8(22):1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, L. M., Hammond, D., Bartholomew, P. I., Almaguer, D., Heitbrink, W., and Topmiller, C. J. (2011). EPHB Report No. 356-12a: Engineering Controls for Nano-Scale Graphene Platelets During Manufacturing and Handling Process. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, R., Clark, K., and Riediker, M. (2013). Comparative Testing of a Miniature Diffusion Size Classifier to Assess Airborne Ultrafine Particles Under Field Conditions. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 47(1):22–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Methner, M., Hodson, L., and Geraci, C. (2009). Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique (NEAT) for the Identification and Measurement of Potential Inhalation Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials - Part A. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 7(3):127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirer, F. E., and Stellman, J. M. (2008). Occupational Safety and Health Protections, in International Encyclopedia of Public Health, K. Heggenhougen, S. R. Quah, eds., Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, pp. 658–668.
   Google Scholar
• Misra, C., Singh, M., Shen, S., Sioutas, C., and Hall, P. M. (2002). Development and Evaluation of a Personal Cascade Impactor Sampler (PCIS). J. Aerosol Sci., 33(7):1027–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietroiusti, A., and Magrini, A. (2014). Engineered Nanoparticles at the Workplace: Current Knowledge About Workers' Risk. Occ. Med., 64(5):319–330.
   Google Scholar
• Price, H. D., Stahlmecke, B., Arthur, R., Kaminski, H., Lindermann, J., Däuber, E., Asbach, C., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., BéruBé, K. A., and Jones, T. P. (2014). Comparison of Instruments for Particle Number Size Distribution Measurements in Air Quality Monitoring. J. Aerosol Sci., 76:48–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafiee, M., Rafiee, J., Wang, Z., Song, H., Yu, Z. Z., and Koratkar, N. (2009). Enhanced Mechanical Properties of Nanocomposites at Low Graphene Content. ACS Nano, 3(12):3884–3890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinazzè, A., Cattaneo, A., Scocca, D. R., Bonzini, M., and Cavallo, D. M. (2015). Multi-metric Measurement of Personal Exposure to Ultrafine Particles in Selected Urban Microenvironments. Atm. Environ., 110:8–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. (2010). Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices. Signature Publications, Cincinnati, OH.
   Google Scholar
• UNI EN 12341. (1999). Air Quality - Determination of the PM₁₀ Fraction of Suspended Particulate Matter Reference Method and Field Test Procedure to Demonstrate Reference Equivalence of Measurement Methods. Ente italiano di normazione, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• UNI EN 14907. (2005). Ambient Air Quality - Standard Gravimetric Measurement Method for the Determination of the PM_2,5 Mass Fraction of Suspended Particulate Matter. Ente italiano di normazione, Milan, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Van Broekhuizen, P., van Veelen, W., Streekstra, W.-H., Schulte, P., and Reijnders, L. (2012). Exposure Limits for Nanoparticles: Report of an International Workshop on Nano Reference Values. Ann. Occup. Hyg., 56:515–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittmaack, K. (2002). Advanced Evaluation of Size-differential Distributions of Aerosol Particles. J. Aerosol Sci., 33(7):1009–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, N., Pollitt, K. J. G., Jeong, C. H., Wang, J. M., Jung, T., Cooper, J. M., Wallace, J. S., and Evans, G. J. (2014). Comparison of Three Nanoparticle Sizing Instruments: The Influence of Particle Morphology. Atm. Environ., 86:140–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar