Measuring aerosol size distributions with the aerodynamic aerosol classifier

References

• Agarwal, J. K., and Sem, G. J. (1980). Continuous Flow, Single-Particle-Counting Condensation Nucleus Counter. J. Aerosol Sci., 11(4):343–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, P. A. (1986). Calibration and Use of the Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS 3300). Aerosol Sci. Technol., 5(1):55–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bau, S., and Witschger, O. (2013). A Modular Tool for Analyzing Cascade Impactors Data to Improve Exposure Assessment to Airborne Nanomaterials. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser., 429(1):12002.
   Google Scholar
• Birmili, W., Stratmann, F., Wiedensohler, A., Covert, D., Russell, L. M., and Berg, O. (1997). Determination of Differential Mobility Analyzer Transfer Functions Using Identical Instruments in Series. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 27(2):215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B. T., Cheng, Y. S., and Yeh, H. C. (1990). A Study of Density Effect and Droplet Deformation in the TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 12(2):278–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez, J. L. (2004). Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 38(12):1185–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finlay, W. H. (2001). The Mechanics of Inhaled Pharmaceutical Aerosols: An Introduction. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fissan, H., Hummes, D., Stratmann, F., Büscher, P., Neumann, S., Pui, D. Y. H., and Chen, D. (1996). Experimental Comparison of Four Differential Mobility Analyzers for Nanometer Aerosol Measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 24(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, R., McMurry, P. H., and Christopher J. Hogan, J. (2015). The Bipolar Diffusion Charging of Nanoparticles: A Review and Development of Approaches for Non-Spherical Particles. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 49(12):1181–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, R., Thajudeen, T., Ouyang, H., and Hogan, C. J. (2013). The Unipolar Diffusion Charging Of Arbitrary Shaped Aerosol Particles. J. Aerosol Sci., 64(Supplement C):60–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunn, R., and Woessner, R. H. (1956). Measurements of the Systematic Electrification of Aerosols. J. Colloid Sci., 11(3):254–259.
   Google Scholar
• He, M., and Dhaniyala, S. (2013). A Multiple Charging Correction Algorithm for Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer Data. J. Aerosol Sci., 61:13–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W. C. (1999). Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Hummes, D., Neumann, S., Fissan, H., and Stratmann, F. (1996). Experimental Determination of the Transfer Function of a Differential Mobility Analyzer (DMA) in the Nanometer Size Range. Part. Part. Syst. Charact., 13(5):327–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvinen, A., Aitomaa, M., Rostedt, A., Keskinen, J., and Yli-Ojanperä, J. (2014). Calibration of the New Electrical Low Pressure Impactor (ELPI+). J. Aerosol Sci., 69:150–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. J., Symonds, J. P. R., and Olfert, J. S. (2013). Mass-Mobility Measurements Using a Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer and Differential Mobility Spectrometer. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 47(11):1215–1225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, M. N. A., and Martinsson, B. G. (2003). Methods to Measure and Predict the Transfer Function Size Dependence of Individual {DMAs}. J. Aerosol Sci., 34(5):603–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keskinen, J., Pietarinen, K., and Lehtimäki, M. (1992). Electrical Low Pressure Impactor. J. Aerosol Sci., 23(4):353–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Mulholland, G., Kukuck, S., and Pui, D. (2005). Slip Correction Measurements of Certified PSL Nanoparticles Using a Nanometer Differential Mobility Analyzer (nano-DMA) for Knudsen Number From 0.5 to 83. J. Res. Natl. Ins. Standards Technol., 110(1):31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson, E. O., and Whitby, K. T. (1975). Aerosol Classification by Electric Mobility: Apparatus, Theory, and Applications. J. Aerosol Sci., 6(6):443–451.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, P., Baron, P. A., and Willeke, K., editors (2011). Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lall, A. A., and Friedlander, S. K. (2006). On-Line Measurement of Ultrafine Aggregate Surface Area and Volume Distributions by Electrical Mobility Analysis: I. Theoretical Analysis. J. Aerosol Sci., 37(3):260–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lall, A. A., Seipenbusch, M., Rong, W., and Friedlander, S. K. (2006). On-Line Measurement of Ultrafine Aggregate Surface Area and Volume Distributions by Electrical Mobility Analysis: II. Comparison of Measurements and Theory. J. Aerosol Sci., 37(3):272–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Li, L., and Chen, D.-R. (2006). Technical Note: A New Deconvolution Scheme for the Retrieval of True DMA Transfer Function from Tandem DMA Data. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40(12):1052–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsson, B. G., Karlsson, M. N. A., and Frank, G. (2001). Methodology to Estimate the Transfer Function of Individual Differential Mobility Analyzers. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 35(4):815–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfert, J. S., and Collings, N. (2005). New Method for Particle Mass Classification - The Couette Centrifugal Particle Mass Analyzer. J. Aerosol Sci., 36(11):1338–1352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouf, F.-X., and Sillon, P. (2009). Charging Efficiency of the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor’s Corona Charger: Influence of the Fractal Morphology of Nanoparticle Aggregates and Uncertainty Analysis of Experimental Results. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 43(7):685–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg, M. (1988). An Ultrafine Aerosol Size Distribution Measuring System, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, Ann Arbor.
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg, M. R., and McMurry, P. H. (2008). Equations Governing Single and Tandem DMA Configurations and a New Lognormal Approximation to the Transfer Function. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 42(6):421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, F., and Olfert, J. S. (2013). An Instrument for the Classification of Aerosols by Particle Relaxation Time: Theoretical Models of the Aerodynamic Aerosol Classifier. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 47(8):916–926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakoli, F., Symonds, J. P. R., and Olfert, J. S. (2014). Generation of a Monodisperse Size-Classified Aerosol Independent of Particle Charge. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 48(3):i–iv.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSI (2007). Model 3775 Condensation Particle Counter: Operation and Service Manual Revision D.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S. C., and Flagan, R. C. (1990). Scanning Electrical Mobility Spectrometer. Aerosol Sci. Technol., 13(2):230–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedensohler, A. (1988). An Approximation of the Bipolar Charge Distribution for Particles in the Submicron Size Range. J. Aerosol Sci., 19(3):387–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. C., and Liu, B. Y. H. (1980). Aerodynamic Particle Size Measurement by Laser-Doppler Velocimetry. J. Aerosol Sci., 11(2):139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar