Electron tomography of soot for validation of 2D image processing and observation of new structural features

References

• Adachi, K., S. H. Chung, and P. R. Buseck. 2010. Shapes of soot aerosol particles and implications for their effects on climate. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adachi, K., S. H. Chung, H. Friedrich, and P. R. Buseck. 2007. Fractal parameters of individual soot particles determined using electron tomography: Implications for optical properties. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, H. M., and A. Bennett, W. L. Roberts. 2018. Determining fractal properties of soot aggregates and primary particle size distribution in counterflow flames up to 10 atm. Proc. Combust. Inst. 37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batenburg, K. J., S. Bals, J. Sijbers, C. Kübel, P. Midgley, J. Hernandez, U. Kaiser, E. Encina, E. Coronado, and G. Van Tendeloo. 2009. 3D imaging of nanomaterials by discrete tomography. Ultramicroscopy 109 (6):730–740. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2009.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugière, E., F. Gensdarmes, F. Ouf, J. Yon, and A. Coppalle. 2014. Increase in thermophoretic velocity of carbon aggregates as a function of particle size. J. Aerosol Sci. 76:87–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzostowski, M. A., and G. A. McMechan. 1992. 3D tomographic imaging of near-surface seismic velocity and attenuation. Geophysics 57 (3):396–403. doi: 10.1190/1.1443254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, M. F., Y. Teng, and U. O. Koylu. 2007. Diesel engine particulate emissions: A comparison of mobility and microscopy size measurements. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (2):2971–2979. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., C. Li, Z. Ristovski, A. Milic, Y. Gu, M. S. Islam, S. Wang, J. Hao, H. Zhang, C. He, H. Guo, et al. 2017. A review of biomass burning: Emissions and impacts on air quality, health and climate in China. Sci. Total Environ. 579:1000–1034. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastanpour, R., J. M. Boone, and S. N. Rogak. 2016. Automated primary particle sizing of nanoparticle aggregates by tem image analysis. Powder Technol. 295:218–224. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.03.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dastanpour, R., and S. N. Rogak. 2014. Observations of a correlation between primary particle and aggregate size for soot particles. Aerosol sci. Technol. 48 (10):1043–1049. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2014.955565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Temmerman, P. J., E. Verleysen, J. Lammertyn, J. Mast. 2014. Semi-automatic size measurement of primary particles in aggregated nanomaterials by transmission electron microscopy. Powder Technol. 261:191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Eggersdorfer, M. L., D. Kadau, H. J. Herrmann, and S. E. Pratsinis. 2012. Aggregate morphology evolution by sintering: Number and diameter of primary particles. J. Aerosol Sci. 46:7–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2011.11.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farias, T. L., Ü. Ö. Köylü, and M. D G. Carvalho. 1996. Effects of polydispersity of aggregates and primary particles on radiative properties of simulated soot. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 55 (3):357–371. doi: 10.1016/0022-4073(95)00166-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., G. Kanapilly, Y. Cheng, and R. Wolff. 1985. Image enhancement of aggregate aerosols by stereopsis. J. Aerosol sci. 16 (3):211–216. doi: 10.1016/0021-8502(85)90027-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinson, Y. W., J. B. Maughan, W. R. Heinson, A. Chakrabarti, and C. M. Sorensen. 2016. Light scattering q‐space analysis of irregularly shaped particles. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 121:682–691. doi: 10.1002/2015JD024171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., T. Sanders, N. Bernier, A. Grenier, R. B. Pinheiro, F. Mazen, P. Bayle-Guillemaud, and Z. Saghi. 2018. Multivariate analysis and compressed sensing methods for spectroscopic electron tomography of semiconductor devices. Microsc. Microanal. 24 (S1):500–501. doi: 10.1017/S1431927618002994.
   Google Scholar
• Kazemimanesh, M., A. Moallemi, K. Thomson, G. Smallwood, P. Lobo, J. S. Olfert. 2019. A novel miniature inverted-flame burner for the generation of soot nanoparticles. Aerosol Sci Technol. 53 (2):184–195. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2018.1556774.
   Google Scholar
• Kook, S., and L. M. Pickett. 2012. Soot volume fraction and morphology of conventional, fischer-tropsch, coal-derived, and surrogate fuel at diesel conditions. SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubricants 5 (2):647–664. doi: 10.4271/2012-01-0678.
   Google Scholar
• Kremer, J. R., N. M. David, R. J. McIntosh. 1996. Computer visualization of three-dimensional image data using IMOD. J Struct Biol. 116.1:71–76.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, M., H. Lindsay, D. Weitz, R. Ball, R. Klein, and P. Meakin. 1989. Universality of fractal aggregates as probed by light scattering. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 423 (1864):71–87. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1989.0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackowski, D. W., R. A. Altenkirch, M. P. Menguc. 1990. Internal absorption cross sections in a stratified sphere. Appl Opt. 29 (10):1551–1559.
   Google Scholar
• Meakin, P. 1987. Fractal aggregates. Adva Colloid Interface Sci. 28: 249–331.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, M. 2009. A hybrid fast algorithm for first arrivals tomography. Geophys. Prospect. 57 (5):803–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00755.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messaoudil, C., T. Boudier, C. O. S. Sorzano, and S. Marco. 2007. Tomoj: Tomography software for three-dimensional reconstruction in transmission electron microscopy. BMC Bioinformatics 8:288. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, J., J. Cuevas, F. Liu, J. Yon, and A. Fuentes. 2018. Influence of primary particle polydispersity and overlapping on soot morphological parameters derived from numerical tem images. Powder Technol. 330:67–79. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2018.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyeki, S., I. Colbeck. 1995. Fractal dimension analysis of single, in-situ, restructured carbonaceous aggregates. Aerosol Sci Technol. 23 (2):109–120.
   Google Scholar
• Okariz, A., T. Guraya, M. Iturrondobeitia, and J. Ibarretxe. 2017. A methodology for finding the optimal iteration number of the sirt algorithm for quantitative electron tomography. Ultramicroscopy 173:36–46. doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2016.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okyay, G., E. Héripré, T. Reiss, P. Haghi-Ashtiani, T. Auger, and F. Enguehard. 2016. Soot aggregate complex morphology: 3d geometry reconstruction by SEM tomography applied on soot issued from propane combustion. J. Aerosol Sci. 93:63–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orhan, O., E. Haffner-Staton, A. La Rocca, and M. Fay. 2016. Characterisation of flame-generated soot and soot-in-oil using electron tomography volume reconstructions and comparison with traditional 2d-tem measurements. Tribology Int. 104:272–284. doi: 10.1016/j.triboint.2016.09.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey, A., R. K. Chakrabarty, L. Liu, and M. I. Mishchenko. 2015. Empirical relationships between optical properties and equivalent diameters of fractal soot aggregates at 550 nm wavelength. Opt. Exp. 23 (24):A1354–A1362. doi: 10.1364/OE.23.0A1354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rösner, H., S. Parida, D. Kramer, C. Volkert, and J. Weissmüller. 2007. Reconstructing a nanoporous metal in three dimensions: An electron tomography study of dealloyed gold leaf. Adv. Eng. Mater. 9 (7):535–541. doi: 10.1002/adem.200700063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soewono, A., and S. N. Rogak. 2013. Morphology and optical properties of numerically simulated soot aggregates. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 47 (3):267–274. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2012.749972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, K., F. Liu, M. Yang, K. A. Thomson, D. R. Snelling, and G. J. Smallwood. 2007. Numerical simulation aided relative optical density analysis of tem images for soot morphology determination. Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 (1):861–868. doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, K., K. A. Thomson, F. Liu, D. R. Snelling, G. J. Smallwood, and D. Wang. 2006. Determination of the morphology of soot aggregates using the relative optical density method for the analysis of tem images. Combust. Flame 144 (4):782–791. doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2005.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth, P. J. D., M. Ek, and H. Wiinikka. 2019. Real-time, in situ, atomic scale observation of soot oxidation. Carbon Press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poppel, L. H., H. Friedrich, J. Spinsby, S. H. Chung, J. H. Seinfeld, and P. R. Buseck. 2005. Electron tomography of nanoparticle clusters: Implications for atmospheric lifetimes and radiative forcing of soot. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wentzel, M., H. Gorzawski, K.-H. Naumann, H. Saathoff, and S. Weinbruch. 2003. Transmission electron microscopical and aerosol dynamical characterization of soot aerosols. J. Aerosol Sci. 34 (10):1347–1370. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00360-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar