Evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of carbon nanotube and carbon nanofiber aerosols

References

• Aizenberg, V., K. Choe, S. A. Grinshpun, K. Willeke, and P. A. Baron. 2001. Evaluation of personal aerosol samplers challenged with large particles. J. Aerosol Sci. 32 (6):779–793. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(00)00119-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aizenberg, V., S. A. Grinshpun, K. Willeke, J. Smith, and P. A. Baron. 2000. Performance characteristics of the button personal inhalable aerosol sampler. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 61:398–404. doi:10.1080/15298660008984550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) 1999. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati, OH: ACGIH, p. 85.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley, K., and M. Harper. 2013. Analytical performance issues closed-face filter cassette (CFC) sampling—Guidance on procedures for inclusion of material adhering to internal sampler surfaces. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 10 (3):D29–D33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babik, K. R., M. M. Dahm, K. H. Dunn, K. L. Dunn, and M. K. Schubauer-Berigan. 2018. Characterizing workforces exposed to current and emerging non-carbonaceous nanomaterials in the U.S. J. Occup. Envrion. Hyg. 15 (1):44–56. doi:10.1080/15459624.2017.1376252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, P. A., and G. J. Deye. 1990. Electrostatic effects in asbestos sampling I: experimental measurements. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 51 (2):51–62. doi:10.1080/15298669091369330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartley, D. L. 1998. Inhalable aerosol samplers. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13:274–278. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1998.10390082.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, D. L. 2001. Definition and assessment of sampling and analytical accuracy. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 45 (5):357–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beard, J. D., A. Erdely, M. M. Dahm, M. A. de Perio, M. E. Birch, D. E. Evans, J. E. Fernback, T. Eye, V. Kodali, R. R. Mercer, et al. 2018. Carbon nanotube and nanofiber exposure and blood and sputum biomarkers of early effect among U.S. workers. Environ. Int. 116:214–228. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, M. E., B. K. Ku, D. E. Evans, and T. A. Ruda-Eberenz. 2011. Exposure and emissions monitoring during carbon nanofiber production – part I: elemental carbon and iron-soot aerosols. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 55:1016–1036. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, L., L. Cena, M. Orandle, N. Yanamala, M. M. Dahm, M. E. Birch, D. E. Evans, V. K. Kodali, T. Eye, L. Battelli, et al. 2017. In vivo toxicity assessment of occupational components of the carbon nanotube life cycle to provide context to potential health effects. ACS Nano 11 (9):8849–8863. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b03038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boundy, M., D. Leith, and T. Polton. 2006. Method to evaluate the dustiness of pharmaceutical powders. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 50 (5):453–458. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mel004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D., M. Berges, M. A. Virji, W. Fransman, D. Bello, L. Hodson, S. Gabriel, and E. Tielemans. 2012. Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nanoobjects; report of a workshop. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56:1–9. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comité Européen de Normalisation (CEN) 1993. Workplace atmospheres: size fraction definitions for measurements of airborne particles in the workplace (CEN standard EN 481). Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Dahm, M. M., M. K. Schubauer-Berigan, D. E. Evans, M. E. Birch, S. Bertke, J. D. Beard, A. Erdely, J. E. Fernback, R. R. Mercer, and S. A. Grinshpun. 2018. Exposure assessments for a cross-sectional epidemiologic study of US carbon nanotube and nanofiber workers. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 221 (3):429–440. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm, M. M., S. Bertke, and M. K. Schubauer-Berigan. 2019. Predicting occupational exposures to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers based on workplace determinants modeling. Ann. Work Expo. Health 63 (2):158–172. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxy102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm, M. M., D. E. Evans, M. K. Schubauer-Berigan, M. E. Birch, and J. E. Fernback. 2012. Occupational exposure assessment in carbon nanotube and nanofiber primary and secondary manufacturers. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 56:542–556. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahm, M. M., M. K. Schubauer-Berigan, D. E. Evans, M. E. Birch, J. E. Fernback, and J. A. Deddens. 2015. Carbon nanotube and nanofiber exposure assessments: an analysis of 14 site visits. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 59 (6):705–723. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mev020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demange, M., P. Görner, J. M. Elcabache, and R. Wrobel. 2002. Field comparison of 37-mm closed-face cassettes and IOM samplers. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 17 (3):200–208. doi:10.1080/104732202753438289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubey, P., U. Ghia, and L. A. Turkevich. 2017. Computational fluid dynamics analysis of the venturi dustiness tester. Powder Technol. 312:310–320. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2017.02.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastlake, A. C., C. Beaucham, K. F. Martinez, M. M. Dahm, C. Sparks, L. L. Hodson, and C. L. Geraci. 2016. Refinement of the nanoparticle emission assessment technique into the nanomaterial exposure assessment technique (NEAT 2.0). J. Occup. Envrion. Hyg. 13 (9):708–717. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1167278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellenbecker, M., S. J. Tsai, M. Jacobs, M. Riediker, T. Peters, S. Liou, A. Avila, and S. FossHansen. 2018. The difficulties in establishing an occupational exposure limit for carbon nanotubes. J. Nanopart. Res. 20:131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-018-4221-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., L. A. Turkevich, C. T. Roettgers, and G. J. Deye. 2014. Comment on comparison of powder dustiness methods. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 58:524–528. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meu039.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans, D. E., L. A. Turkevich, C. T. Roettgers, G. J. Deye, and P. A. Baron. 2013. Dustiness of fine and nanoscale powders. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 57 (2):261–277. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. E., B. K. Ku, M. E. Birch, and K. H. Dunn. 2010. Aerosol monitoring during carbon nanofiber production: mobile direct-reading sampling. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 54:514–531. doi:10.1093/annhyg/meq015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatkhutdinova, L. M., T. O. Khaliullin, R. R. Zalyalov, A. G. Tkachev, M. E. Birch, and A. A. Shvedova. 2016a. Assessment of airborne multiwalled carbon nanotubes in a manufacturing environment. Nanotechnol. Russia 11 (1–2):110–116. doi:10.1134/S1995078016010055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatkhutdinova, L. M., T. O. Khaliullin, O. L. Vasil’yeva, R. R. Zalyalov, I. G. Mustafin, E. R. Kisin, M. E. Birch, N. Yanamala, and A. A. Shvedova. 2016b. Fibrosis biomarkers in workers exposed to MWCNTs. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 15:125–131. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2016.02.016.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J. H., E. J. Lee, J. H. Lee, K. P. So, Y. H. Lee, G. N. Bae, S. B. Lee, J. H. Ji, M. H. Cho, and I. J. Yu. 2008. Monitoring multiwalled carbon nanotube exposure in carbon nanotube research facility. Inhal. Toxicol. 20 (8):741–749. doi:10.1080/08958370801942238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper, M., and B. S. Muller. 2002. An evaluation of total and inhalable samplers for the collection of wood dust in three wood products industries. J. Environ. Monit. 4 (5):648–656.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hauck, B. C., S. A. Grinshpun, A. Reponen, T. Reponen, K. Willeke, and R. L. Bornschein. 1997. Field testing of new aerosol sampling method with a porous curved surface as inlet. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 58 (10):713–719. doi:10.1080/15428119791012351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedmer, M., C. Isaxon, P. T. Nilsson, L. Ludvigsson, M. E. Messing, J. Genberg, V. Skaug, M. Bohgard, H. Tinnerberg, and J. H. Pagels. 2014. Exposure and emission measurements during production, purification, and functionalization of arc-discharge-produced multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 58:355–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung, R. W., and L. D. Reed. 1990. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of non-detectable values. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 5 (1):46–51. doi:10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389587.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 1995. Air quality-particle size fraction definitions for health-related sampling (ISO standard 7708). Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, L. C., R. J. Aitken, P. E. J. Baldwin, G. C. Beaumont, and A. D. Maynard. 1999. The sampling efficiency of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in low air movement environments. J. Aerosol Sci. 30 (5):627–638. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(98)00752-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, L. C., R. Aitken, C. Chalmers, J. F. Fabries, E. Gonzalez-Fernandez, H. Kromhout, G. Liden, D. Mark, G. Riediger, and V. Prodi. 1997. A collaborative European study of personal inhalable aerosol sampler performance. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 41 (2):135–153. doi:10.1016/S0003-4878(96)00034-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen, K. B., T. Berthing, P. Jackson, S. S. Poulsen, A. Mortensen, N. R. Jacobsen, V. Skaug, J. Szarek, K. S. Hougaard, and H. Wolff. 2019. Physicochemical predictors of multi-walled carbon nanotube-induced pulmonary histopathology and toxicity one year after pulmonary deposition of 11 different multi-walled carbon nanotubes in mice. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 124 (2):211–227. doi:10.1111/bcpt.13119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, N., H. Izumi, and Y. Morimoto. 2017. Review of toxicity studies of carbon nanotubes. J. Occup. Health 59 (5):394–407. doi:10.1539/joh.17-0089-RA.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ku, B. K., and M. E. Birch. 2019. Aerosolization and characterization of carbon nanotube and nanofiber materials: relationship between aerosol properties and bulk density. J. Aerosol Sci. 127:38–48. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuijpers, E., C. Bekker, W. Fransman, D. Brouwer, P. Tromp, J. Vlaanderen, L. Godderis, P. Hoet, Q. Lan, D. Silverman, et al. 2016. Occupational exposure to multi-walled carbon nanotubes during commercial production synthesis and handling. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 60 (3):305–317. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mev082.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee, J. S., Y. C. Choi, J. H. Shin, J. H. Lee, Y. Lee, S. Y. Park, J. E. Baek, J. D. Park, K. Ahn, and I. J. Yu. 2015. Health surveillance study of workers who manufacture multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Nanotoxicology 9 (6):802–811. doi:10.3109/17435390.2014.978404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., E. K. Sohn, J. S. Ahn, K. Ahn, K. S. Kim, J. H. Lee, T. M. Lee, and I. J. Yu. 2013. Exposure assessment of workers in printed electronics workplace. Inhal. Toxicol. 25 (8):426–434. doi:10.3109/08958378.2013.800617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., S.-B. Lee, G. N. Bae, K. S. Jeon, J. U. Yoon, J. H. Ji, J. H. Sung, B. G. Lee, J. H. Lee, J. S. Yang, et al. 2010. Exposure assessment of carbon nanotube manufacturing workplaces. Inhal. Toxicol. 22 (5):369–381. doi:10.3109/08958370903367359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liden, G., and J. Surakka. 2009. A headset-mounted mini sampler for measuring exposure to welding aerosol in the breathing zone. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 53 (2):99–116. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mep001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L'Orange, C., K. Anderson, D. Sleeth, T. R. Anthony, and J. Volckens. 2016. A simple and disposable sampler for inhalable aerosol. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 60 (2):150–160. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mev065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, A. D., P. A. Baron, M. Foley, A. A. Shvedova, E. R. Kisin, and V. Castranova. 2004. Exposure to carbon nanotube material: aerosol release during the handling of unrefined single-walled carbon nanotube material. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 67 (1):87–107. doi:10.1080/15287390490253688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, A. R., E. R. Kisin, A. V. Tkach, N. Yanamala, R. Mercer, S. H. Young, B. Fadeel, V. E. Kagan, and A. A. Shvedova. 2012. Factoring-in agglomeration of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers for better prediction of their toxicity versus asbestos. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 9 (1):10. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-9-10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NIOSH 2013. Current intelligence bulletin 65: occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers. Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH). Publication Number 2013–145.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH 2016. Manual of analytical methods. Method 5040 diesel particulate matter (as elemental carbon). In NIOSH method of analytical methods, ed. K. Ashley, P. F. O’Connor, 5th ed., Issue 2, 94–113. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. DHHS (NIOSH).
   Google Scholar
• Ogura, I., H. Sakurai, K. Mizuno, and M. Gamo. 2011. Release potential of single-wall carbon nanotubes produced by super-growth method during manufacturing and handling. J. Nanopart. Res. 13 (3):1265–1280. doi:10.1007/s11051-010-0119-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, G., M. Ostraat, D. E. Evans, M. M. Methner, P. O'Shaughnessy, J. D'Arcy, C. L. Geraci, E. Stevenson, A. Maynard, and K. Rickabaugh. 2011. A strategy for assessing workplace exposures to nanomaterials. J. Occup. Envrion. Hyg. 8 (11):673–685. doi:10.1080/15459624.2011.623223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubauer-Berigan, M. K., M. M. Dahm, A. Erdely, J. D. Beard, M. E. Birch, D. E. Evans, J. E. Fernback, R. R. Mercer, S. J. Bertke, T. Eye, et al. 2018. Association of pulmonary, cardiovascular, and hematologic metrics with carbon nanotube and nanofiber exposure among U.S. workers: a cross-sectional study. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 15:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubauer-Berigan, M. K., M. M. Dahm, and M. S. Yencken. 2011. Engineered carbonaceous nanomaterials manufacturers in the United States: workforce size, characteristics, and feasibility of epidemiologic studies. J. Occup. Envrion. Med. 53:S62–S67. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e31821b1e2c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvedova, A. A., N. Yanamala, E. R. Kisin, T. O. Khailullin, M. E. Birch, and L. M. Fatkhutdinova. 2016. Integrated analysis of dysregulated ncRNA and mRNA expression profiles in humans exposed to carbon nanotubes. PLoS ONE 11 (3):e0150628. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. H. 2006. Testing personal inhalable aerosol samplers: a suggested improved protocol based on new scientific knowledge. J. Environ. Monit. 8 (1):53–62. doi:10.1039/B509222A.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang, Z. L., R. P. Gao, P. Poncharal, W. A. de Heer, Z. R. Dai, and Z. W. Pan. 2001. Mechanical and electrostatic properties of carbon nanotubes and nanowires. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 16 (1–2):3–10. doi:10.1016/S0928-4931(01)00293-4.
   Google Scholar
• Willeke, K., and P. A. Baron. 1990. Sampling and interpretation errors in aerosol monitoring. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 51 (3):160–168. doi:10.1080/15298669091369484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar