Preface

References

• 40 Code of Federal Regulations § 58 Appendix D, 2018. Network Design Criteria for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring. https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/CFR-2012-title40-vol6/CFR-2012-title40-vol6-part58-appD. Last accessed, December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• AE. 2020. Air Sensors International Conference, Special Issue of Atmospheric Environment. Volckens, J. and Dhaniyala, S. (eds.). https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/atmospheric-environment/special-issue/10N14DH9TMQ. Last accessed, December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Apte, J. S., Messier, K. P., Gani, S., Brauer, M., Kirchstetter, T. W., Lunden, M. M., Marshall, J. D., Portier, C. J., Vermeulen, R. C. H., and Hamburg, S. P. 2017. High-resolution air pollution mapping with Google street view cars: exploiting big data. Environ. Sci. Tech. 51(12):6999–7008. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AQ-SPEC. 2019. Air Quality Sensor Performance Evaluation Center (AQ-SPEC). South Coast Air Quality Management District, Los Angeles, CA. http://www.aqmd.gov/aq-spec. Last accessed December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• ASIC. 2018. Air Sensors International Conference. https://asic2018.aqrc.ucdavis.edu/about. Last accessed, December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Brantley, H. L., Hagler, G. S. W., Kimbrough, E. S., Williams, R. W., Mukerjee, S., and Neas, L. M. 2014. Mobile air monitoring data-processing strategies and effects on spatial air pollution trends. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 7(7): 2169–2183. doi: 10.5194/amt-7-2169-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. H., and Pickering, K. E. 2014. DISCOVER-AQ: Advancing strategies for air quality observations in the next decade. Environ. Manage, 4–7. http://pubs.awma.org/flip/EM-Sept-2014/emsept14.pdf.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPA. 2019a. Air Sensor Toolbox. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www.epa.gov/air-sensor-toolbox. Last accessed December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2019b. Chemical Speciation Network (CSN). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. https://www.epa.gov/amtic/chemical-speciation-network-csn. Last accessed December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• He, M., and Dhaniyala, S. 2012. Vertical and Horizontal Concentration Distributions of Ultrafine Particles near a Highway. Atmospheric Environment 46:225–236. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2013. Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press. http://www.climatechange2013.org/report/full-report/.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., Morawska, L., Martani, C., Biskos, G., Neophytou, M., Di Sabatino, S., Bell, M., Norford, L., and Britter, R. 2015. The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. Environ. Int. 75:199–205. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Fung, J. C. H., and Lau, A. K. H. 2018. High spatiotemporal characterization of on-road PM2.5 concentrations in high-density urban areas using mobile monitoring. Building and Environ. 143:196–205. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawska, L., Thai, P. K., Liu, X., Asumadu-Sakyi, A., Ayoko, G., Bartonova, A., Bedini, A., Chai, F., Christensen, B., Dunbabin, M., Gao, J., Hagler, G. S. W., Jayaratne, R., Kumar, P., Lau, A. K. H., Louie, P. K. K, Mazaheri, M., Ning, Z., Motta, N., Mullins, B., Rahman, M. M., Ristovski, Z., Shafiei, M., Tjondronegoro, D., Westerdahl, D., and Williams, R. 2018. Applications of low-cost sensing technologies for air quality monitoring and exposure assessment: How far have they gone? Environ. Int. 116:286–299. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papapostolou, V., Zhang, H., Feenstra, B. J., and Polidori, A. 2017. Development of an environmental chamber for evaluating the performance of low-cost air quality sensors under controlled conditions. Atmos. Environ. 171:82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polidori, A., Papapostolou, V., Feenstra, B., and Zhang, H. 2017. Field evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors field setup and testing protocol. South Coast Air Quality Management District. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/aq-spec/protocols/sensors-field-testing-protocol.pdf. Last accessed December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Ranasinghe, D., Choi, W. S., Winer, A. M., and Paulson, S. E. 2016. Developing high spatial resolution concentration maps using mobile air quality measurements. Aerosol and Air Qual. Res. 16(8):1841–1853. doi: 10.4209/aaqr.2015.07.0484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seinfeld, J., and Pandis, S. 2016. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, E., Watkins, T., Solomon, P. A., Thoma, E., Williams, R., Hagler, G., Shelow, D., Hindin, D., and Kilaru, V. 2013. The Changing paradigm of air pollution monitoring. Feature article, Environ. Sci. Tech. 47(20):11369–11377. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es4022602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, P. A., Costantini, M., Grahame, T. J., Gerlofs-Nijland, M. E., Cassee, F., Russell, A. G., Brook, J. R., Hopke, P. K., Hidy, G., Phalen, R. F., Saldiva, P., Ebelt Sarnat, S., Balmes, J. R., Tager, I. B., Özkaynak, H., Vedal, S., Wierman, S. S. G., and Costa, D. L. 2012. Air Pollution and Health: Bridging the Gap from Sources to Health Outcomes: Conference Summary. Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health 5(1):9–62. doi: 10.1007/s11869-011-0161-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon. P. A., Hopke, P. K., Froines, J., and Scheffe, R. 2008. Key Scientific and Policy- and Health-Relevant Findings from EPA’s Particulate Matter Supersites Program and Related Studies: An Integration and Synthesis of Results. J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 58(13):S1–S92. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3155/1047-3289.58.2.137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon, P. A., Vallano, D., Lunden, M., LaFranchi, B., Blanchard, C. L., and Shaw, S. L. 2019. Mobile-platform measurement of air pollutant concentrations in California: Performance assessment, statistical methods for evaluating spatial variations, and spatial representativeness. Atmos. Meas.Tech., submitted for publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, J., Peters, J., Verwaeren, J., Botteldooren, D., Theunis, J., and De Baets, B. 2015. Mobile monitoring for mapping spatial variation in urban air quality: Development and validation of a methodology based on an extensive dataset. Atmos. Environ. 105:148–161. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. 2006. Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005: Particulate Matter, Ozone, Nitrogen Dioxide and Sulfur Dioxide. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Denmark. http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78638/E90038.pdf, Last accessed, December 16, 2019.
   Google Scholar