Using an inkjet aerosol generator to study particle bounce in optical particle counters

References

• Bohren, C. F., and D. R. Huffman. 1998. Absorption and scattering by a sphere. In Absorption and scattering of light by small particles, 82–129. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
   Google Scholar
• Borggräfe, P., A. Trampe, and H. Fissan. 2002. Quantitative characterization of noise in the measurement chain of an optical particle counter. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13:445–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B. T., H. C. Yeh, and Y. S. Cheng. 1985. A novel virtual impactor: Calibration and use. J. Aerosol Sci. 16 (4):343–54. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(85)90042-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y.-S. and H.-C. Yeh. 1979. Particle bounce in cascade impactors. Env. Sci. Technol. 13:1392–6. doi:10.1021/es60159a017.
   Google Scholar
• CRC. 2013. Section 4: Properties of the elements and inorganic compounds. In CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 93rd edition (DVD version 2013), ed. W. Haynes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández de la Mora, J., and J. Kozlowski. 2013. Hand-held differential mobility analyzers of high resolution for 1–30nm particles: Design and fabrication considerations. J. Aerosol Sci. 57:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.10.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horender, S., K. Auderset, and K. Vasilatou. 2019. Facility for calibration of optical and condensation particle counters based on a turbulent aerosol mixing tube and a reference optical particle counter. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 90 (7):075111. doi: 10.1063/1.5095853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida, K., and H. Sakurai. 2018. Counting efficiency evaluation of optical particle counters in micrometer range by using an inkjet aerosol generator. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 52 (10):1156–11. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2018.1505032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iida, K., H. Sakurai, K. Saito, and K. Ehara. 2014. Inkjet aerosol generator as monodisperse particle number standard. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 48 (8):789–802. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2014.930948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/TC24/SC4/WG3. 2014. Determination of density by volumetric displacement—Skeleton density by gas pycnometry. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO/TC24/SC4/WG9. 2018. ISO 21501-4: Determination of particle size distribution – Single particle light interaction methods – Part 4: Light scattering airborne particle counter for clean spaces. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Katayama, H., K. Yoshihara, H. Saito, M. Akutagawa, A. Okamoto, R. Okamoto, M. Kaneko, Y. Kawakita, M. Kamitani, R. Gotoda, et al. 2012. Evaluation of rapid microbiological method for airborne bacterium. PDA J. GMP Valid. Japan 14:43–7. doi: 10.11347/pda.14.43.
   Google Scholar
• Kawai, M., T. Ichijo, Y. Takahashi, M. Noguchi, H. Katayama, O. Cho, T. Sugita, and M. Nasu. 2019. Culture independent approach reveals domination of human-oriented microbes in a pharmaceutical manufacturing facility. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 137:104973. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2019.104973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerker, M. 1969. The scattering of light and other electromagnetic radiation: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kesavan, J., J. R. Bottiger, and A. R. McFarland. 2008. Bioaerosol concentrator performance: Comparative tests with viable and with solid and liquid nonviable particles. J. Appl. Microbiol. 104 (1):285–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03560.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, T.-C., and C.-J. Tsai. 2021. Inertial impaction technique for the classification of particulate matters and nanoparticles: A review. KONA 38:42–63. doi: 10.14356/kona.2021004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malli Mohan, G. B., M. C. Stricker, and K. Venkateswaran. 2019. Microscopic characterization of biological and inert particles associated with spacecraft assembly cleanroom. Sci. Rep. 9 (1):14251. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50782-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marple, V. A., and B. A. Olson. 2011. Sampling and measurement using inertial, gravitational, centrifugal, and thermal techniques. In Aerosol measurement, ed. P. Kulkani, P. A. Baron, and K. Willeke, eds., 3rd ed., 129–51. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Marple, V. A., K. L. Rubow, and S. M. Behm. 1991. A microorifice uniform deposit impactor (moudi): Description, calibration, and use. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 14 (4):434–46. doi: 10.1080/02786829108959504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minakami, T., T. Hosokawa, K. Kondo, K. Iida, K. Ehara, and H. Sakurai. 2017. Evaluation of counting efficiencies for optical particle counters by using inkjet aerosol generator. Earozoru Kenkyu 32:29–36. doi: 10.11203/jar.32.29.
   Google Scholar
• Muyshondt, A., A. R. McFarland, and N. K. Anand. 1996. Deposition of aerosol particles in contraction fittings. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 24 (3):205–16. doi: 10.1080/02786829608965364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachweh, B., H. Umhauer, F. Ebert, H. Büttner, and R. Friehmelt. 1998. In situ optical particle counter with improved coincidence error correction for number concentrations up to 107 particles cm − 3. J. Aerosol Sci. 29 (9):1075–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502.(98)80004-9. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(98)80004-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang-Nourpour, N., and J. S. Olfert. 2019. Calibration of optical particle counters with an aerodynamic aerosol classifier. J. Aerosol Sci. 138:105452. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2019.105452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, S., K. Iida, K. Yashiro, Y. Murashima, H. Sakurai, and J. S. Olfert. 2020. Determining the cutoff diameter and counting efficiency of optical particle counters with an aerodynamic aerosol classifier and an inkjet aerosol generator. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 54 (11):1335–10. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1777252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilatou, K., K. Dirscherl, K. Iida, H. Sakurai, S. Horender, and K. Auderset. 2020. Calibration of optical particle counters: First comprehensive inter-comparison for particle sizes up to 5 µm and number concentrations up to 2 cm − 3. Metrologia 57 (2):025005. doi: 10.1088/1681-7575/ab5c84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volckens, J., and T. M. Peters. 2005. Counting and particle transmission efficiency of the aerodynamic particle sizer. J. Aerosol Sci. 36 (12):1400–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yli-Ojanpera, J., H. Sakurai, K. Iida, J. M. Makela, K. Ehara, and J. Keskinen. 2012. Comparison of three particle number concentration calibration standards through calibration of a single cpc in a wide particle size range. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46 (11):1163–73. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2012.701023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar