Development and initial testing of an active low-power, ferroelectric film-based bioaerosol sampler

References

• An, H. R., G. Mainelis, and M. Yao. 2004. Evaluation of a high-volume portable bioaerosol sampler in laboratory and field environments. Indoor Air. 14 (6):385–93. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2004.00257.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carotenuto, F., T. Georgiadis, B. Gioli, C. Leyronas, C. Morris, M. Nardino, G. Wohlfahrt, and F. Miglietta. 2017. Measurements and modeling of surface–atmosphere exchange of microorganisms in Mediterranean grassland. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17 (24):14919–36. doi:10.5194/acp-17-14919-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, C. S., and C. M. Wathes. 1995. Bioaerosols handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., C. J. Kampf, B. Weber, J. A. Huffman, C. Pöhlker, M. O. Andreae, N. Lang-Yona, S. M. Burrows, S. S. Gunthe, W. Elbert, et al. 2016. Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and ecosystem interactions. Atmos. Res. 182:346–76. doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.07.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, B., H. Lal, and A. Srivastava. 2015. Review of bioaerosols in indoor environment with special reference to sampling, analysis and control mechanisms. Environ. Int. 85:254–72. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goheen, S. C., E. C. Larkin, and M. G. Bissell. 1984. Ozone produced by corona discharge in the presence of water. Int. J. Biometeorol. 28 (2):157–61. doi:10.1007/BF02191728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, X. D., H. Wex, T. Muller, A. Wiedensohler, K. Hohler, K. Kandler, N. Ma, B. Dietel, T. Schiebel, O. Mohler, et al. 2019. Characterization of aerosol properties at Cyprus, focusing on cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating particles. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19 (16):10883–900. doi:10.5194/acp-19-10883-2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haatainen, S., J. Laitinen, M. Linnainmaa, T. Reponen, and P. Kalliokoski. 2010. The suitability of the IOM foam sampler for bioaerosol sampling in Occupational Environments. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 7 (1):1–6. doi:10.1080/15459620903298015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig, C. W., W. G. Mackay, J. T. Walker, and C. Williams. 2016. Bioaerosol sampling: Sampling mechanisms, bioefficiency and field studies. J. Hosp. Infect. 93 (3):242–55. doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2016.03.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T., H. R. An, and G. Mainelis. 2010. Performance of an electrostatic precipitator with superhydrophobic surface when collecting airborne bacteria. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 44 (5):339–48. doi:10.1080/02786821003649352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T., and G. Mainelis. 2008. Design and development of an electrostatic sampler for bioaerosols with high concentration rate. J. Aerosol Sci. 39 (12):1066–78. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T., Y. Nazarenko, P. J. Lioy, and G. Mainelis. 2011. Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols. Indoor Air. 21 (2):110–20. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2010.00685.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T. T., N. T. Myers, S. Manibusan, and G. Mainelis. 2022. Development and optimization of Stationary Electrostatic Bioaerosol Sampler (SEBS) for viable and culturable airborne microorganisms. J. Aerosol Sci. 162:105951. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.105951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T. T., N. M. Thomas, and G. Mainelis. 2017. Design and development of a self-contained personal electrostatic bioaerosol sampler (PEBS) with a wire-to-wire charger. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51 (8):903–15. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1329516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T., M. Wren, K. DuBois, J. Therkorn, and G. Mainelis. 2015. Application of ATP-based bioluminescence for bioaerosol quantification: Effect of sampling method. J. Aerosol Sci. 90:114–23. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, T., H. J. Zhen, D. E. Fennell, and G. Mainelis. 2015. Design and evaluation of the field-deployable electrostatic precipitator with superhydrophobic surface (FDEPSS) with high concentration rate. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 15 (6):2397–408. doi:10.4209/aaqr.2015.04.0206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W. C. 1999. Aerosol technology: Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kilburg-Basnyat, B., N. Metwali, and P. S. Thorne. 2016. Performance of electrostatic dust collectors (EDCs) for endotoxin assessment in homes: Effect of mailing, placement, heating, and electrostatic charge. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 13 (2):85–93. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1078468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepeis, N. E., W. C. Nelson, W. R. Ott, J. P. Robinson, A. M. Tsang, and P. Switzer. 2001. The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. J. Expo. Anal. Env. Epid. 11 (3):231–52. doi:10.1038/sj.jea.7500165.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C. S., and Y. M. Wen. 2003. Control effectiveness of electrostatic precipitation on airborne microorganisms. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 37 (12):933–8. doi:10.1080/02786820300903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macher, J. M. 1989. Positive-hole correction of multiple-jet impactors for collecting viable microorganisms. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 50 (11):561–8. doi:10.1080/15298668991375164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainelis, G. 1999. Collection of airborne microorganisms by electrostatic precipitation. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 30 (2):127–44. doi:10.1080/027868299304732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainelis, G., R. L. Gorny, T. Reponen, M. Trunov, S. A. Grinshpun, P. Baron, J. Yadav, and K. Willeke. 2002. Effect of electrical charges and fields on injury and viability of airborne bacteria. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 79 (2):229–41. doi:10.1002/bit.10290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainelis, G., K. Willeke, P. Baron, T. Reponen, S. A. Grinshpun, R. L. Gorny, and S. Trakumas. 2001. Electrical charges on airborne microorganisms. J. Aerosol Sci. 32 (9):1087–110. doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00039-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainelis, G. 2020. Bioaerosol sampling: Classical approaches, advances, and perspectives. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 54 (5):496–519. doi:10.1080/02786826.2019.1671950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manibusan, S., and G. Mainelis. 2018. Investigation of bioaerosol charge levels indoors using the rutgers electrostatic passive sampler (REPS). 2018 International Aerosol Conference, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Manibusan, S., and G. Mainelis. 2021. Effect of sampling duration on bioaerosol culturability when using passive sampling devices. AAAR Annual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Matthias-Maser, S., and R. Jaenicke. 1994. Examination of atmospheric bioaerosol particles with radii > 0.2 μm. J. Aerosol Sci. 25 (8):1605–13. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(94)90228-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mbareche, H., M. Veillette, G. J. Bilodeau, and C. Duchaine. 2018. Bioaerosol sampler choice should consider efficiency and ability of samplers to cover microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 84 (23):e01589-18. doi:10.1128/AEM.01589-18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mescioglu, E., A. Paytan, B. W. Mitchell, and D. W. Griffin. 2021. Efficiency of bioaerosol samplers: A comparison study. Aerobiologia 37 (3):447–59. doi:10.1007/s10453-020-09686-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metaxatos, A., S. Manibusan, and G. Mainelis. 2021. Investigation of sources, diversity, and variability of bacterial aerosols in Athens, Greece: A pilot study. Atmosphere 13 (1):45. doi:10.3390/atmos13010045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miksch, R. R., P. Gefter, S. Gehlke, H. A. Halpin, J. S. Meschke, B. Smith, and M. Yost. 2009. Relationship between surface electrostatic potential and deposition of airborne bacteria. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 45 (3):1068–73. doi:10.1109/TIA.2009.2018977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh, H. J., T. T. Han, and G. Mainelis. 2020. Performance of two different techniques to concentrate samples for bioaerosol quantification. Atmosphere 11 (5):504. doi:10.3390/atmos11050504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passos, R. G., M. B. Silveira, and J. S. Abrahao. 2021. Exploratory assessment of the occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 in aerosols in hospital facilities and public spaces of a metropolitan center in Brazil. Environ. Res. 195:110808. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.110808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyamvada, H., K. Kumaragama, A. Chrzan, C. Athukorala, S. Sur, and S. Dhaniyala. 2021. Design and evaluation of a new electrostatic precipitation-based portable low-cost sampler for bioaerosol monitoring. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 55 (1):24–36. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1812503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rufino de Sousa, N., N. Sandstrom, L. Shen, K. Hakansson, R. Vezozzo, K. I. Udekwu, J. Croda, and A. G. Rothfuchs. 2020. A fieldable electrostatic air sampler enabling tuberculosis detection in bioaerosols. Tuberculosis 120:101896. doi:10.1016/j.tube.2019.101896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samet, J. M., K. Prather, G. Benjamin, S. Lakdawala, J. M. Lowe, A. Reingold, J. Volckens, and L. C. Marr. 2021. Airborne transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): What we know. Clin. Infect. Dis. 73 (10):1924–6. doi:10.1093/cid/ciab039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshadri, S., T. Han, V. Krumins, D. E. Fennell, and G. Mainelis. 2009. Application of ATP bioluminescence method to characterize performance of bioaerosol sampling devices. J. Aerosol Sci. 40 (2):113–21. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F. X., W. Kai, and M. S. Yao. 2013. Negatively and positively charged bacterial aerosol concentration and diversity in natural environments. Chin. Sci. Bull. 58 (26):3169–76. doi:10.1007/s11434-013-5852-9.
   Google Scholar
• Soo, J. C., K. Monaghan, T. Lee, M. Kashon, and M. Harper. 2016. Air sampling filtration media: Collection efficiency for respirable size-selective sampling. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50 (1):76–87. doi:10.1080/02786826.2015.1128525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therkorn, J., N. Thomas, L. Calderon, J. Scheinbeim, and G. Mainelis. 2017. Design and development of a passive bioaerosol sampler using polarized ferroelectric polymer film. J. Aerosol Sci. 105:128–44. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therkorn, J., N. Thomas, J. Scheinbeim, and G. Mainelis. 2017. Field performance of a novel passive bioaerosol sampler using polarized ferroelectric polymer films. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51 (7):787–800. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1316830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Doremalen, N., T. Bushmaker, D. H. Morris, M. G. Holbrook, A. Gamble, B. N. Williamson, A. Tamin, J. L. Harcourt, N. J. Thornburg, S. I. Gerber, et al. 2020. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl. J. Med. 382 (16):1564–7. doi:10.1056/NEJMc2004973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, M. S., and G. Mainelis. 2006. Utilization of natural electrical charges on airborne microorganisms for their collection by electrostatic means. J. Aerosol Sci. 37 (4):513–27. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen, H., T. Han, D. E. Fennell, and G. Mainelis. 2013. Release of free DNA by membrane-impaired bacterial aerosols due to aerosolization and air sampling. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79 (24):7780–9. doi:10.1128/AEM.02859-13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar