Laboratory determination of gravimetric correction factors for real-time area measurements of electronic cigarette aerosols: Part 2

References

• Breland, A., E. Soule, A. Lopez, C. Ramôa, A. El-Hellani, and T. Eissenberg. 2017. Electronic cigarettes: What are they and what do they do? Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1394 (1):5–30. doi:10.1111/nyas.12977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkart, J., G. Steiner, G. Reischl, H. Moshammer, M. Neuberger, and R. Hitzenberger. 2010. Characterizing the performance of two optical particle counters (grimm opc1.108 and opc1.109) under urban aerosol conditions. J. Aerosol Sci. 41:953–62. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A., K. McAdam, J. Thissen, and H. Digard. 2020. The evolving e-cigarette: Comparative chemical analyses of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke. Front. Toxicol. 2:586674. doi:10.3389/ftox.2020.586674.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Czogala, J., M. L. Goniewicz, B. Fidelus, W. Zielinska-Danch, M. J. Travers, and A. Sobczak. 2014. Secondhand exposure to vapors from electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob. Res. 16 (6):655–62. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntt203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, G., E. A. Parmentier, I. Taurino, and R. Signorell. 2020. Tracing the composition of single e-cigarette aerosol droplets in situ by laser-trapping and Raman scattering. Sci. Rep. 10 (1):7929. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64886-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eissenberg, T. 2010. Electronic nicotine delivery devices: Ineffective nicotine delivery and craving suppression after acute administration. Tob. Control. 19 (1):87–8. doi:10.1136/tc.2009.033498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EL-Hellani, A., R. Salman, R. El-Hage, S. Talih, N. Malek, R. Baalbaki, N. Karaoghlanian, R. Nakkash, A. Shihadeh, and N. A. Saliba. 2018. Nicotine and carbonyl emissions from popular electronic cigarette products: Correlation to liquid composition and design characteristics. Nicotine Tob. Res. 20 (2):215–23. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntw280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elementvape. 2020. The pg/vg ratio was obtained from the elementvape.Com seller website. Accessed December 2022. https://www.Elementvape.Com/amazing-mango-nkd-100-salt.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 1997. 40 cfr parts 50- reference method for the determination of fine particulate matter as pm2. 5 in the atmosphere (appendix l). Washington, DC: EPA.
   Google Scholar
• Eversole, A., M. Crabtree, T. R. Spindle, M. Baassiri, T. Eissenberg, and A. Breland. 2021. E-cigarette solvent ratio and device power influence ambient air particulate matter. Tob. Regul. Sci. 7 (3):177–83. doi:10.18001/trs.7.3.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goniewicz, M. L., J. Knysak, M. Gawron, L. Kosmider, A. Sobczak, J. Kurek, A. Prokopowicz, M. Jablonska-Czapla, C. Rosik-Dulewska, C. Havel, et al. 2014. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob. Control. 23 (2):133–9. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halterman, A., S. Sousan, and T. M. Peters. 2017. Comparison of respirable mass concentrations measured by a personal dust monitor and a personal dataram to gravimetric measurements. Ann. Work Expo. Health. 62 (1):62–71. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxx083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvanko, A. M., C. M. Havel, P. Jacob, and N. L. Benowitz. 2020. Characterization of nicotine salts in 23 electronic cigarette refill liquids. Nicotine Tob. Res. 22 (7):1239–43. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntz232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiler, M., N. Karaoghlanian, S. Talih, S. Maloney, A. Breland, A. Shihadeh, and T. Eissenberg. 2020. Effects of electronic cigarette heating coil resistance and liquid nicotine concentration on user nicotine delivery, heart rate, subjective effects, puff topography, and liquid consumption. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 28 (5):527–39. doi:10.1037/pha0000337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, W. C. 1999. Aerosol technology: Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Ingebrethsen, B. J., S. K. Cole, and S. L. Alderman. 2012. Electronic cigarette aerosol particle size distribution measurements. Inhal. Toxicol. 24 (14):976–84. doi:10.3109/08958378.2012.744781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, D. B., and W. Li. 2021. Particle size measurement of electronic cigarette aerosol with a cascade impactor. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 55:205–14. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1849536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, P., J. Dubray, E. K. Soule, C. O. Cobb, S. Zarins, and R. Schwartz. 2018. Analysis of secondhand e-cigarette aerosol compounds in an indoor setting. Tob. Regul. Sci. 4:29–37. doi:10.18001/TRS.4.3.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leigh, N. J., R. I. Lawton, P. A. Hershberger, and M. L. Goniewicz. 2016. Flavourings significantly affect inhalation toxicity of aerosol generated from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ends). Tob. Control. 25 (2):ii81–7. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., E. S. Lee, C. Nguyen, and Y. Zhu. 2020. Effects of propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin, and nicotine on emissions and dynamics of electronic cigarette aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 54 (11):1270–81. doi:10.1080/02786826.2020.1771270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, F., M. Yu, C. Chen, L. Liu, P. Zhao, B. Shen, and R. Sun. 2022. The emission of vocs and co from heated tobacco products, electronic cigarettes, and conventional cigarettes, and their health risk. Toxics 10:8. doi:10.3390/toxics10010008.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Y. Wu, L. Li, Y. Guo, E. Çetintaş, Y. Zhu, and A. Ozcan. 2021. Dynamic imaging and characterization of volatile aerosols in e-cigarette emissions using deep learning-based holographic microscopy. ACS Sens. 6 (6):2403–10. doi:10.1021/acssensors.1c00628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melstrom, P., B. Koszowski, M. H. Thanner, E. Hoh, B. King, R. Bunnell, and T. McAfee. 2017. Measuring pm2.5, ultrafine particles, nicotine air and wipe samples following the use of electronic cigarettes. Nicotine Tob. Res. 19 (9):1055–61. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ni, Y., G. Shi, and J. Qu. 2020. Indoor pm2.5, tobacco smoking and chronic lung diseases: A narrative review. Environ. Res. 181:108910. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2019.108910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olegario, J. M., S. Regmi, and S. Sousan. 2021. Evaluation of low-cost optical particle counters for agricultural exposure measurements. Appl Eng Agric. 37:113–22. doi:10.13031/aea.14091.
   Google Scholar
• Palmisani, J., A. Di Gilio, L. Palmieri, C. Abenavoli, M. Famele, R. Draisci, and G. de Gennaro. 2019. Evaluation of second-hand exposure to electronic cigarette vaping under a real scenario: Measurements of ultrafine particle number concentration and size distribution and comparison with traditional tobacco smoke. Toxics 7:59. doi:10.3390/toxics7040059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. M., D. Chavez, S. Sousan, N. Figueroa-Bernal, J. R. Alvarez, and J. Rocha-Peralta. 2022. Personal exposure monitoring using gps-enabled portable air pollution sensors: A strategy to promote citizen awareness and behavioral changes regarding indoor and outdoor air pollution. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. doi:10.1038/s41370-022-00515-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. M., S. Sousan, D. Streuber, and K. Zhao. 2021. Geoair—a novel portable, gps-enabled, low-cost air-pollution sensor: Design strategies to facilitate citizen science research and geospatial assessments of personal exposure. Sensors (Basel) 21:3761. doi:10.3390/s21113761.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protano, C., P. Avino, M. Manigrasso, V. Vivaldi, F. Perna, F. Valeriani, and M. Vitali. 2018. Environmental electronic vape exposure from four different generations of electronic cigarettes: Airborne particulate matter levels. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15:2172. doi:10.3390/ijerph15102172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousan, S., A. Gray, C. Zuidema, L. Stebounova, G. Thomas, K. Koehler, and T. Peters. 2018. Sensor selection to improve estimates of particulate matter concentration from a low-cost network. Sensors (Basel) 18:3008. doi:10.3390/s18093008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousan, S., K. Koehler, L. Hallett, and T. M. Peters. 2016a. Evaluation of the alphasense optical particle counter (opc-n2) and the grimm portable aerosol spectrometer (pas-1.108). Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50 (12):1352–65. doi:10.1080/02786826.2016.1232859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousan, S., K. Koehler, L. Hallett, and T. M. Peters. 2017. Evaluation of consumer monitors to measure particulate matter. J. Aerosol Sci. 107:123–33. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.02.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousan, S., K. Koehler, G. Thomas, J. H. Park, M. Hillman, A. Halterman, and T. M. Peters. 2016b. Inter-comparison of low-cost sensors for measuring the mass concentration of occupational aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 50:462–73. doi:10.1080/02786826.2016.1162901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousan, S., J. Pender, D. Streuber, M. Haley, W. Shingleton, and E. Soule. 2022a. Laboratory determination of gravimetric correction factors for real-time area measurements of electronic cigarette aerosols. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 56:517–29. doi:10.1080/02786826.2022.2047152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousan, S., S. Regmi, and Y. M. Park. 2021. Laboratory evaluation of low-cost optical particle counters for environmental and occupational exposures. Sensors (Basel) 21:4146. doi:10.3390/s21124146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousan, S., D. Streuber, Y. M. Park, V. Coombs, J. Pender, and E. Soule. 2022b. Evaluation of low-cost aerosol and gas sensors for real-time measurements of electronic cigarette exposure. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 57:153–64. doi:10.1080/02786826.2022.2154192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streuber, D., Y. M. Park, and S. Sousan. 2022. Laboratory and field evaluations of the geoair2 air quality monitor for use in indoor environments. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 22:220119. doi:10.4209/aaqr.220119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talih, S., Z. Balhas, T. Eissenberg, R. Salman, N. Karaoghlanian, A. El Hellani, R. Baalbaki, N. Saliba, and A. Shihadeh. 2015. Effects of user puff topography, device voltage, and liquid nicotine concentration on electronic cigarette nicotine yield: Measurements and model predictions. Nicotine Tob. Res. 17 (2):150–7. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talih, S., R. Salman, E. Soule, R. El-Hage, E. Karam, N. Karaoghlanian, A. El-Hellani, N. Saliba, and A. Shihadeh. 2021. Electrical features, liquid composition and toxicant emissions from 'pod-mod’-like disposable electronic cigarettes. Tob. Control 31 (5):tobaccocontrol-2020-056362. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzortzi, A., S. I. Teloniatis, G. Matiampa, G. Bakelas, V. K. Vyzikidou, C. I. Vardavas, P. K. Behrakis, and E. Fernandez. 2018. Passive exposure to e-cigarette emissions: Immediate respiratory effects. Tob. Prev. Cessat. 4:18. doi:10.18332/tpc/89977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Drooge, B. L., E. Marco, N. Perez, and J. O. Grimalt. 2019. Influence of electronic cigarette vaping on the composition of indoor organic pollutants, particles, and exhaled breath of bystanders. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 26 (5):4654–66. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3975-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaporboss. 2022. The pg/vg ratio was obtained from the vaporboss.Com seller website. Accessed December 2022. https://vaporboss.Com/products/esco-bars-2500-puff-disposables#:∼:Text=this%20compact%20and%20lightweight%20vape,pg%20ratio%20of%2070%3a30..
   Google Scholar
• Vargas-Rivera, M., M. Ebrahimi Kalan, M. Ward-Peterson, O. Osibogun, W. Li, D. Brown, T. Eissenberg, and W. Maziak. 2021. Effect of flavour manipulation on ends (juul) users’ experiences, puffing behaviour and nicotine exposure among us college students. Tob. Control 30:399–404. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley, S. C., K. M. Wilson, J. P. Winickoff, and J. Groner. 2019. A public health crisis: Electronic cigarettes, vape, and juul. Pediatrics 143:e20182741. doi:10.1542/peds.2018-2741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuidema, C., L. V. Stebounova, S. Sousan, G. Thomas, K. Koehler, and T. M. Peters. 2019. Sources of error and variability in particulate matter sensor network measurements. J. Occup. Environ. Hyg.16:564–74. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1628965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar