Using particle-resolved aerosol model simulations to guide the interpretations of cloud condensation nuclei experimental data

References

• Andreae, M. O., and D. Rosenfeld. 2008. Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols. Earth. Sci. Rev. 89 (1–2):13–41. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aneja, V. P., J. Blunden, K. James, W. H. Schlesinger, R. Knighton, W. Gilliam, G. Jennings, D. Niyogi, and S. Cole. 2008. Ammonia Assessment from Agriculture: U.S. Status and Needs. J. Environ. Qual. 37 (2):515–20. doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0002in.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, S. N., M. Sharma, V. P. Aneja, and R. Balasubramanian. 2013. Ammonia in the atmosphere: A review on emission sources, atmospheric chemistry and deposition on terrestrial bodies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 20 (11):8092–131. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-2051-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondy, A. L., D. Bonanno, R. C. Moffet, B. Wang, A. Laskin, and A. P. Ault. 2018. The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 (16):12595–612. doi:10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C. N., and S. N. Pandis. 1998. The effect of organic coatings on the cloud condensation nuclei activation of inorganic atmospheric aerosol. J. Geophys. Res. 103 (D11):13111–23. doi:10.1029/98JD00979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubison, M. J., B. Ervens, G. Feingold, K. S. Docherty, I. M. Ulbrich, L. Shields, K. Prather, S. Hering, and J. L. Jimenez. 2008. The influence of chemical composition and mixing state of Los Angeles urban aerosol on CCN number and cloud properties. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (18):5649–67. doi:10.5194/acp-8-5649-2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, J. H., M. D. Michelotti, N. Riemer, M. T. Heath, and M. West. 2016. Accelerated simulation of stochastic particle removal processes in particle-resolved aerosol models. Comput. Phys. 322:21–32. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2016.06.029.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. N., K. A. Malek, P. N. Razafindrambinina, T. M. Raymond, D. D. Dutcher, A. A. Asa-Awuku, and M. A. Freedman. 2020. Direct comparison of the submicron aerosol hygroscopicity of water-soluble sugars. ACS Earth Space Chem. 4 (12):2215–26. doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.0c00159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVille, N., M. Riemer, and West, L. 2019. Convergence of a generalized weighted flow algorithm for stochastic particle coagulation. J. Comput. Dyn. 6 (1):69–94. doi:10.3934/jcd.2019003.
   Google Scholar
• DeVille, R. E. L., N. Riemer, and M. West. 2011. Weighted Flow Algorithms (WFA) for stochastic particle coagulation. Comput. Phys. 230 (23):8427–51. doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2011.07.027.
   Google Scholar
• Dusek, U., G. P. Frank, L. Hildebrandt, J. Curtius, J. Schneider, S. Walter, D. Chand, F. Drewnick, S. Hings, D. Jung, et al. 2006. Size matters more than chemistry aerosol particles. Science 312 (5778):1375–8. doi:10.1126/science.1125261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feingold, G. 2003. Modeling of the first indirect effect: Analysis of measurement requirements. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 (19):1–4. doi:10.1029/2003GL017967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fofie, E. A., N. M. Donahue, and A. Asa-Awuku. 2018. Cloud condensation nuclei activity and droplet formation of primary and secondary organic aerosol mixtures. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 52 (2):242–51. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1392480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gohil, K., and A. A. Asa-Awuku. 2022. Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity analysis of low-hygroscopicity aerosols using the aerodynamic aerosol classifier (AAC). Atmos. Meas. Tech. 15 (4):1007–19. doi:10.5194/amt-15-1007-2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, J. G. 2007. Variability of the relationship between particle size and cloud-nucleating ability. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34:1–5. doi:10.1029/2006GL028850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, N., S. S. Yum, M. Park, J. S. Park, H. J. Shin, and J. Y. Ahn. 2020. Hygroscopicity of urban aerosols and its link to size-resolved chemical composition during spring and summer in Seoul, Korea. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (19):11245–62. doi:10.5194/acp-20-11245-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreidenweis, S. M., and A. Asa-Awuku. 2014. Aerosol hygroscopicity: Particle water content and its role in atmospheric processes. In Treatise on Geochemistry, eds. Heinrich D. Holland and Karl K. Turekian, 2nd ed., 331–361. Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-095975-7.00418-6.
   Google Scholar
• Lambe, A. T., T. B. Onasch, P. Massoli, D. R. Croasdale, J. P. Wright, A. T. Ahern, L. R. Williams, D. R. Worsnop, W. H. Brune, and P. Davidovits. 2011. Laboratory studies of the chemical composition and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and oxidized primary organic aerosol (OPOA). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (17):8913–28. doi:10.5194/acp-11-8913-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lance, S., T. Raatikainen, T. B. Onasch, D. R. Worsnop, X. Y. Yu, M. L. Alexander, M. R. Stolzenburg, P. H. McMurry, J. N. Smith, and A. Nenes. 2013. Aerosol mixing state, hygroscopic growth and cloud activation efficiency during MIRAGE 2006. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 (9):5049–62. doi:10.5194/acp-13-5049-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, T., A. Zuend, W. G. Wang, Y. H. Zhang, and M. F. Ge. 2014. Hygroscopicity of organic compounds from biomass burning and their influence on the water uptake of mixed organic ammonium sulfate aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14 (20):11165–83. doi:10.5194/acp-14-11165-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marynowski, L., and B. R. T. Simoneit. 2022. Saccharides in atmospheric particulate and sedimentary organic matter: Status overview and future perspectives. Chemosphere 288 (Pt 1):132376. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. H., and A. Nenes. 2009. Scanning flow CCN analysis method for fast measurements of CCN spectra. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 43 (12):1192–207. doi:10.1080/02786820903289780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. H., A. Nenes, and J. Medina. 2010. Scanning mobility CCN analysis-A method for fast measurements of size-resolved CCN distributions and activation kinetics. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 44 (10):861–71. doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.498715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, C., P. N. Razafindrambinina, K. A. Malek, L. Chen, W. Wang, R.-J. Huang, Y. Zhang, X. Ding, M. Ge, X. Wang, et al. 2021. Interactions of organosulfates with water vapor under sub- and supersaturated conditions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21 (9):7135–48. doi:10.5194/acp-21-7135-2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petters, M. D., and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2007. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7 (8):1961–71. doi:10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petters, M. D., and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2008. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity - Part 2: Including solubility. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (20):6273–9. doi:10.5194/acp-8-6273-2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petters, M. D., and S. M. Kreidenweis. 2013. A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity-Part 3: Including surfactant partitioning. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 (2):1081–91. doi:10.5194/acp-13-1081-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razafindrambinina, P. N., K. A. Malek, J. N. Dawson, K. DiMonte, T. M. Raymond, D. D. Dutcher, M. A. Freedman, and A. Asa-Awuku. 2022. Hygroscopicity of internally mixed ammonium sulfate and secondary organic aerosol particles formed at low and high relative humidity. Environ. Sci.: Atmos. 2 (2):202–14. doi:10.1039/D1EA00069A.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, N., A. P. Ault, M. West, R. L. Craig, and J. H. Curtis. 2019. Aerosol mixing state: Measurements, modeling, and impacts. Rev. Geophys. 57 (2):187–249. doi:10.1029/2018RG000615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, N., M. West, R. A. Zaveri, and R. C. Easter. 2009. Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle-resolved aerosol model. J. Geophys. Res. 114 (D9):1–22. doi:10.1029/2008JD011073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. C., P. Artaxo, J. Zhou, E. Swietlicki, and M. O. Andreae. 2002. Sensitivity of CCN spectra on chemical and physical properties of aerosol : A case study from the Amazon Basin. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 107:1–18. doi:10.1029/2001JD000583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shou, C., N. Riemer, T. B. Onasch, A. J. Sedlacek, A. T. Lambe, E. R. Lewis, P. Davidovits, and M. West. 2019. Mixing state evolution of agglomerating particles in an aerosol chamber: Comparison of measurements and particle-resolved simulations. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 53 (11):1229–43. doi:10.1080/02786826.2019.1661959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, R. H., and R. A. Robinson. 1966. Interactions in aqueous nonelectrolyte solutions. I. Solute-solvent equilibria. J. Phys. Chem. 70 (7):2126–31. doi:10.1021/j100879a010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenningsson, B., J. Rissler, E. Swietlicki, M. Mircea, M. Bilde, M. C. Facchini, S. Decesari, S. Fuzzi, J. Zhou, J. Mønster, et al. 2006. Hygroscopic growth and critical supersaturations for mixed aerosol particles of inorganic and organic compounds of atmospheric relevance. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6 (7):1937–52. doi:10.5194/acp-6-1937-2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, J., B. T. Brem, M. West, T. C. Bond, M. J. Rood, and N. Riemer. 2017. Simulating aerosol chamber experiments with the particle-resolved aerosol model PartMC. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 51 (7):856–67. doi:10.1080/02786826.2017.1311988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, J., N. Riemer, M. West, L. Pfaffenberger, H. Schlager, and A. Petzold. 2014. Modeling the evolution of aerosol particles in a ship plume using PartMC-MOSAIC. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14 (11):5327–47. doi:10.5194/acp-14-5327-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, D., S. Gao, T. Berte, M. Kacarab, Q. Yao, K. Vafai, and A. Asa-Awuku. 2019. External and internal cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) mixtures: Controlled laboratory studies of varying mixing states. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 12 (8):4277–89. doi:10.5194/amt-12-4277-2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., L. Li, J. Zhou, J. Ye, W. Dai, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, R. Zhang, J. Tian, Y. Chen, et al. 2020. Measurement report: Source and mixing state of black carbon aerosol in the North China Plain: Implications for radiative effect. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (23):15427–42. doi:10.5194/acp-20-15427-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, P. 1973. The growth of atmospheric aerosol particles as a function of the relative humidity—II. An improved concept of mixed nuclei. J. Aerosol Sci. 4 (5):373–87. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(73)90027-X.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, W., J. Ovadnevaite, K. N. Fossum, C. Lin, R.-J. Huang, C. O'Dowd, and D. Ceburnis. 2020. Aerosol hygroscopicity and its link to chemical composition in the coastal atmosphere of Mace Head: Marine and continental air masses. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 20 (6):3777–91. doi:10.5194/acp-20-3777-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, Q., E. S. Robinson, X. Ding, P. Ye, R. Sullivan, and N. Robinson. 2016. Mixing of secondary organic aerosols versus relative humidity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 113 (45):12649–54. doi:10.1073/pnas.1604536113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., and C. Zhao. 2023. Quantifying particle-to-particle heterogeneity in aerosol hygroscopicity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23 (5):3195–205. doi:10.5194/acp-23-3195-2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaveri, R. A., J. C. Barnard, R. C. Easter, N. Riemer, and M. West. 2010. Particle-resolved simulation of aerosol size, composition, mixing state, and the associated optical and cloud condensation nuclei activation properties in an evolving urban plume. J. Geophys. Res. 115 (D17):D17210. doi:10.1029/2009JD013616.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao, D. F., A. Buchholz, B. Kortner, P. Schlag, F. Rubach, A. Kiendler-Scharr, R. Tillmann, A. Wahner, J. M. Flores, Y. Rudich, et al. 2015. Size-dependent hygroscopicity parameter (κ) and chemical composition of secondary organic cloud condensation nuclei. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42 (24):10–,920. doi:10.1002/2015GL066497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar