Exploring the potential for continuous measurement of ultrafine particle mass concentration (PM_0.1) based on measurements of particle number concentration above 50 nm (N₅₀)

References

• Adams, P. J., and J. H. Seinfeld. 2002. Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (D19):4370. doi: 10.1029/2001JD001010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asmi, A., A. Wiedensohler, P. Laj, A. Fjaeraa, K. Sellegri, W. Birmili, E. Weingartner, U. Baltensperger, V. Zdimal, N. Zikova, et al. 2011. Number size distributions and seasonality of submicron particles in Europe 2008–2009. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (11):5505–38. doi: 10.5194/acp-11-5505-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldauf, R. W., R. B. Devlin, P. Gehr, R. Giannelli, B. Hassett-Sipple, H. Jung, G. Martini, J. McDonald, J. D. Sacks, and K. Walker. 2016. Ultrafine particle metrics and research considerations: Review of the 2015 UFP Workshop. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 13:1054. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13111054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birmili, W., B. Alaviippola, D. Hinneburg, O. Knoth, T. Tuch, J. Borken-Kleefeld, and A. Schacht. 2009. Dispersion of traffic-related exhaust particles near the Berlin urban motorway – Estimation of fleet emission factors. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 (7):2355–74. doi: 10.5194/acp-9-2355-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, W. P. L. 2000. Programs and files implementing the SAPRC-99 mechanism and its associates emissions processing procedures for models-3 and other regional models.
   Google Scholar
• Cassee, F., L. Morawska, A. Peters, A. Wierzbicka, G. Buonanno, J. Cyrys, J. SchnelleKreis, M. Kowalski, M. Riediker, W. Birmili, et al. 2019. White paper: Ambient ultrafine particles: Evidence for policy makers. https://efca.net/files/WHITE%20PAPER-UFP%20evidence%20for% 20policy% 20makers%20(25%20OCT).pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Jesus, A. L., M. M. Rahman, M. Mazaheri, H. Thompson, L. D. Knibbs, C. Jeong, G. Evans, W. Nei, A. Ding, L. Qiao, et al. 2019. Ultrafine particles and PM2.5 in the air of cities around the world: Are they representative of each other? Environ. Int. 129:118–35. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.05.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., A. J. H. Visschedijk, C. Johansson, E. Hedberg Larsson, R. Harrison, and D. Beddows. 2009. Size resolved pan European anthropogenic particle number inventory, EUCAARI Deliverable report D141 (available on request from EUCAARI project office). Hague, The Netherlands: TNO.
   Google Scholar
• Donahue, N. M., A. L. Robinson, C. O. Stanier, and S. N. Pandis. 2006. Coupled partitioning, dilution, and chemical aging of semivolatile organics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40 (8):2635–43. doi: 10.1021/es052297c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, K., V. Stone, A. Clouter, L. Renwick, and W. MacNee. 2001. Ultrafine particles. Occup. Environ. Med. 58 (3):211–6, 199. doi: 10.1136/oem.58.3.211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eeftens, M., H. C. Phuleria, R. Meier, I. Aguilera, E. Corradi, M. Davey, R. Ducret-Stich, M. Fierz, R. Gehrig, A. Ineichen, et al. 2015. Spatial and temporal variability of ultrafine particles, NO2, PM2.5, PM2.5 absorbance, PM10 and PMcoarse in Swiss study areas. Atmos. Environ. 111:60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.03.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environ 2003. User’s guide to the comprehensive air quality model with extensions (CAMx). Version 4.02, report, ENVIRON International Corporation, Novato, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Fountoukis, C., P. N. Racherla, H. A. C. Denier van der Gon, P. Polymeneas, P. E. Charalampidis, C. Pilinis, A. Wiedensohler, M. Dall’Osto, C. O'Dowd, and S. N. Pandis. 2011. Evaluation of a three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the European domain during the EUCAARI May 2008 campaign. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (20):10331–47. doi: 10.5194/acp-11-10331-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fountoukis, C., I. Riipinen, H. A. C. Denier van der Gon, P. E. Charalampidis, C. Pilinis, A. Wiedensohler, C. O'Dowd, J. P. Putaud, M. Moerman, and S. N. Pandis. 2012. Simulating ultrafine particle formation in Europe using a regional CTM: Contribution of primary emissions versus secondary formation to aerosol number concentrations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12 (18):8663–77. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-8663-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaydos, T., R. Pinder, B. Koo, K. Fahey, G. Yarwood, and S. N. Pandis. 2007. Development and application of a three-dimensional chemical transport model, PMCAMx. Atmos. Environ. 41 (12):2594–611. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.11.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., A. Melas, G. Martini, and P. Dilara. 2021. Overview of vehicle exhaust particle number regulations. Processes 9 (12):2216. doi: 10.3390/pr9122216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giechaskiel, B., A. Melas, G. Martini, P. Dilara, and L. Ntziachristos. 2022. Revisiting total particle number measurements for vehicle exhaust regulations. Atmosphere 13 (2):155. doi: 10.3390/atmos13020155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halek, F., M. Kianpour-Rad, and A. Kavousirahim. 2010. Seasonal variation in ambient PM mass and number concentrations (case study: Tehran, Iran). Environ. Monit. Assess. 169 (1–4):501–7. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-1192-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HEI Review Panel on Ultrafine Particles 2013. Understanding the health effects of ambient ultrafine particles. HEI perspectives 3. Boston, MA: Health Effects Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, T., A. Puustinen, P. P. Aalto, J. M. Mäkelä, K. Hämeri, and M. Kulmala. 2004. Urban aerosol number size distributions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4 (2):391–411. doi: 10.5194/acp-4-391-2004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalava, P. I., R. O. Salonen, A. S. Pennanen, M. Sillanpää, A. I. Hälinen, M. S. Happo, R. Hillamo, B. Brunekreef, K. Katsouyanni, J. Sunyer, et al. 2007. Heterogeneities in inflammatory and cytotoxic responses of RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line to urban air coarse, fine, and ultrafine particles from six European sampling campaigns. Inhal. Toxicol. 19 (3):213–25. doi: 10.1080/08958370601067863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, J. G., C. Fountoukis, P. J. Adams, and S. N. Pandis. 2010. Simulation of in situ ultrafine particle formation in the eastern United States using PMCAMx-UF. J. Geophys. Res. 115 (D3):D03203. doi: 10.1029/2009JD012313.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, J., P. J. Adams, and S. N. Pandis. 2006. Simulating the size distribution and chemical composition of ultrafine particles during nucleation events. Atmos. Environ. 40 (13):2248–59. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.09.082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karydis, V. A., A. P. Tsimpidi, and S. N. Pandis. 2007. Evaluation of a three-dimensional chemical transport model (PMCAMx) in the eastern United States for all four seasons. J. Geophys. Res. 112 (D14):D14211. doi: 10.1029/2006JD007890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittelson, D., I. Khalek, J. McDonald, J. Stevens, and R. Giannelli. 2022. Particle emissions from mobile sources: Discussion of ultrafine particle emissions and definition. J. Aerosol Sci. 159:1–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2021.105881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulmala, M., A. Asmi, H. K. Lappalainen, U. Baltensperger, J.-L. Brenguier, M. C. Facchini, H.-C. Hansson, Ø. Hov, C. D. O'Dowd, U. Pöschl, et al. 2011. General overview: European Integrated project on Aerosol Cloud Climate and Air Quality interactions (EUCAARI) – Integrating aerosol research from nano to global scales. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11 (24):13061–143. doi: 10.5194/acp-11-13061-2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., A. Wiedensohler, W. Birmili, P. Quincey, and M. Hallquist. 2016. Ultrafine particles pollution and measurements. The Quality of Air 73:369–90. doi: 10.1016/bs.coac.2016.04.004.
   Google Scholar
• Kuwayama, T., C. R. Ruehl, and M. J. Kleeman. 2013. Daily trends and source apportionment of ultrafine particulate mass (PM0.1) over an annual cycle in a typical California city. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47 (24):13957–66. doi: 10.1021/es403235c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, H. S., M. H. Ryu, and C. Carlsten. 2020. Ultrafine particles: Unique physicochemical properties relevant to health and disease. Exp. Mol. Med. 52 (3):318–28. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0405-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, N., C. Sioutas, A. Cho, D. Schmitz, C. Misra, J. Sempf, M. Wang, T. Oberley, J. Froines, and A. Nel. 2003. Ultrafine particulate pollutants induce oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage. Environ. Health Perspect. 111 (4):455–60. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mönkkönen, P., I. K. Koponen, K. E. Lehtinen, K. Hämeri, R. Uma, and M. Kulmala. 2005. Measurements in a highly polluted Asian mega city: Observations of aerosol number size distribution, modal parameters and nucleation events. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5 (1):57–66. doi: 10.5194/acp-5-57-2005.
   Google Scholar
• Napari, I., M. Noppel, H. Vehkamaki, and M. Kulmala. 2002. Parameterization of ternary nucleation rates for H2SO4-NH3-H2O vapors. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (D19):4381. 2JD002132 doi: 10.1029/200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlwein, S., R. Kappeler, M. Kutlar Joss, N. Künzli, and B. Hoffmann. 2019. Health effects of ultrafine particles: A systematic literature review update of epidemiological evidence. Int. J. Public Health 64 (4):547–59. doi: 10.1007/s00038-019-01202-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostro, B., J. Hu, D. Goldberg, P. Reynolds, A. Hertz, L. Bernstein, and M. J. Kleeman. 2015. Associations of mortality with long-term exposures to fine and ultrafine particles, species and sources: Results from the California Teachers Study Cohort. Environ. Health Perspect. 123 (6):549–56. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1408565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patoulias, D., and S. N. Pandis. 2022. Simulation of the effects of low-volatility organic compounds on aerosol number concentrations in Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22 (3):1689–706. doi: 10.5194/acp-22-1689-2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patoulias, D., C. Fountoukis, I. Riipinen, and S. N. Pandis. 2015. The role of organic condensation on ultrafine particle growth during nucleation events. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15 (11):6337–50. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-6337-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patoulias, D., C. Fountoukis, I. Riipinen, A. Asmi, M. Kulmala, and S. N. Pandis. 2018. Simulation of the size-composition distribution of atmospheric nanoparticles over Europe. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18 (18):13639–54. doi: 10.5194/acp-18-13639-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraufnagel, D. E. 2020. The health effects of ultrafine particles. Exp. Mol. Med. 52 (3):311–7. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0403-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis. 2016. Atmospheric chemistry and physics: From air pollution to climate change. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Traboulsi, H., N. Guerrina, M. Iu, D. Maysinger, P. Ariya, and C. Baglole. 2017. Inhaled pollutants: The molecular scene behind respiratory and systemic diseases associated with ultrafine particulate matter. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18:243. doi: 10.3390/ijms18020243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. EPA 2019. Integrated science assessment (ISA) for particulate matter (EPA Document No. EPA 600/R-19/188), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• WHO Regional Office for Europe 2013. Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution – REVIHAAP. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Weichenthal, S., L. Bai, M. Hatzopoulou, K. Van Ryswyk, J. C. Kwong, M. Jerrett, A. van Donkelaar, R. V. Martin, R. T. Burnett, H. Lu, et al. 2017. Long-term exposure to ambient ultrafine particles and respiratory disease incidence in in Toronto, Canada: A cohort study. Environ. Health 16 (1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12940-017-0276-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiedensohler, A., W. Birmili, A. Nowak, A. Sonntag, K. Weinhold, M. Merkel, B. Wehner, T. Tuch, S. Pfeifer, M. Fiebig, et al. 2012. Mobility particle size spectrometers: Harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 5 (3):657–85. doi: 10.5194/amt-5-657-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, W., J. Xue, A. Mousavi, C. Sioutas, and M. J. Kleeman. 2020a. Positive matrix factorization of ultrafine particle mass (PM0.1) at three sites in California. Sci. Total Environ. 715:136902. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, W., J. Xue, F. Shirmohammadi, C. Sioutas, A. Lolinco, A. Hasson, and M. J. Kleeman. 2020b. Day-of-week patterns for ultrafine particulate matter components at four sites in California. Atmos. Environ. 222:117088. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.117088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, X., M. Venecek, A. Kumar, J. Hu, S. Tanrikulu, S. T. Soon, C. Tran, D. Fairley, and M. J. Kleeman. 2019. Regional sources of airborne ultrafine particle number and mass concentrations in California. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19 (23):14677–702. doi: 10.5194/acp-19-14677-2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, R., G. Wang, S. Guo, M. L. Zamora, Q. Ying, Y. Lin, W. Wang, M. Hu, and Y. Wang. 2015. Formation of urban fine particulate matter. Chem. Rev. 115 (10):3803–55. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar