Measurement of 100 nm monodisperse particles by four Accurate methods: Traceability and uncertainty

References

• Dagata, J. A., N. Farkas, P. Kavuri, A. E. Vladar, C. L. Wu, H. Itoh, and K. Ehara. 2016. Method for measuring the diameter of polystyrene latex reference spheres by atomic force microscopy. Special Publication (NIST SP) 260–185.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, G. L., L. Koenders, J. Fluegge, and H. Bosse. 2016. Two approaches for realizing traceability in nanoscale dimensional metrology. Opt. Eng. 55 (9):091407. doi: 10.1117/1.OE.55.9.091407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixson, R., R. Köning, V. W. Tsai, J. Fu, and T. V. Vorburger. 1999. Nanometer-scale dimensional metrology with the NIST calibrated atomic force microscope. Microsc. Microanal. 5 (S2):958–9. doi: 10.1017/S1431927600018110.
   Google Scholar
• Duelge, K., G. Mulholland, M. Zachariah, and V. Hackley. 2022. Accurate nanoparticle size determination using electrical mobility measurements in the step and scan modes. Aerosol Sci. Techno. 56 (12):1096–113. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2022.2128986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehara, K., K. Takahata, and M. Koike. 2006a. Absolute mass and size measurement of monodisperse particles using a modified Millikan’s method: Part I – Theoretical framework of the electro-gravitational aerosol balance. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40 (7):514–20. doi: 10.1080/02786820600714379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehara, K., K. Takahata, and M. Koike. 2006b. Absolute mass and size measurement of monodisperse particles using a modified Millikan’s method: Part II – Application of electro-gravitational aerosol balance to polystyrene latex particles of 100 nm to 1 mu m in average diameter. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40 (7):521–35. doi: 10.1080/02786820600714387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas, N., and J. A. Kramar. 2021. Dynamic light scattering distributions by any means. J. Nanopart. Res. 23 (5):120. doi: 10.1007/s11051-021-05220-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., G. W. Mulholland, S. R. Kukuck, and D. Y. H. Pui. 2005. Slip correction measurements of certified PSL nanoparticles using a nanometer differential mobility analyzer (nano-DMA) for Knudsen number from 0.5 to 83. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 110 (1):31–54. doi: 10.6028/jres.110.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenders, L., R. Bergmans, J. Garnaes, J. Haycocks, N. Korolev, T. Kurosawa, F. Meli, B. C. Park, G. S. Peng, G. B. Picotto, et al. 2003. Comparison on Nanometrology: Nano 2-Step height. Metrologia 40 (1A):04001. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/40/1A/04001.
   Google Scholar
• Montoro Bustos, A. R., E. J. Petersen, A. Possolo, and M. R. Winchester. 2015. Post hoc interlaboratory comparison of single particle ICP-MS size measurements of NIST gold nanoparticle reference materials. Anal. Chem. 87 (17):8809–17. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoro Bustos, A. R., K. P. Purushotham, A. Possolo, N. Farkas, A. E. Vladár, K. E. Murphy, and M. R. Winchester. 2018. Validation of single particle ICP-MS for routine measurements of nanoparticle size and number size distribution. Anal. Chem. 90 (24):14376–86. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03871.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulholland, G. W., A. W. Hartman, G. G. Hembree, E. Marx, and T. R. Lettieri. 1985. Development of a one-micrometer-diameter particle-size standard reference material. J Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 90 (1):3–26. doi: 10.6028/jres.090.001.
   Google Scholar
• Mulholland, G. W., M. K. Donnelly, C. R. Hagwood, S. R. Kukuck, V. A. Hackley, and D. Y. H. Pui. 2006. Measurement of 100 nm and 60 nm particle standards by differential mobility analysis. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 111 (4):257–312. doi: 10.6028/jres.111.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, S. B., C. Chan, S. C. Brown, P. Eschbach, L. Han, D. S. Ensor, B. Aleksandr, A. B. Stefaniak, J. Bonevich, A. E. Vladár, et al. 2013. Particle size distributions by transmission electron microscopy: An interlaboratory comparison case study. Metrologia. 50 (6):663–78. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, J. A. 2009. Uncalibrated helium-neon lasers in length metrology. NCSL Int. Measure. 4 (3):52–8. doi: 10.1080/19315775.2009.11721483.
   Google Scholar
• Takahata, K., H. Sakurai, and K. Ehara. 2020. Accurate determination of mass and diameter of monodisperse particles by the electro-gravitational aerosol balance: Correction for the work function imbalance between the electrode surfaces. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 54 (12):1386–98. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2020.1787324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. N., and C. E. Kuyatt. 1994. Guidelines for evaluating and expressing the uncertainty of NIST measurement results. NIST Technical Note 1297 (1994 Edition) National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedensohler, A., W. Birmili, A. Nowak, A. Sonntag, K. Weinhold, M. Merkel, B. Wehner, T. Tuch, S. Pfeifer, M. Fiebig, et al. 2012. Mobility particle size spectrometers: Harmonization of technical standards and data structure to facilitate high quality long-term observations of atmospheric particle number size distributions. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 5 (3):657–85. doi: 10.5194/amt-5-657-2012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, J. C., L. Xiang, K. H. Ngoi, C. H. Chia, K. S. Jin, and M. Ree. 2020. Quantitative structural analysis of polystyrene nanoparticles using synchrotron x-ray scattering and dynamic light scattering. Polymers. 12 (2):477. doi: 10.3390/polym12020477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zangmeister, C. D., and J. G. Radney. 2018. NIST interlaboratory study of aerosol absorption measurements using photoacoustic spectroscopy national institute of standards and technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 27 April 2018.
   Google Scholar