The state of the aerosol: Musings on mixing state

References

• Ault, A. P., C. J. Gaston, Y. Wang, G. Dominguez, M. H. Thiemens, and K. A. Prather. 2010. Characterization of the single particle mixing state of individual ship plume events measured at the port of Los Angeles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44 (6):1954–61. doi:10.1021/es902985h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, S., D. Wright, D. Koch, E. Lewis, R. McGraw, L.-S. Chang, S. Schwartz, and R. Ruedy. 2008. MATRIX (Multiconfiguration Aerosol TRacker of mIXing state): An aerosol microphysical module for global atmospheric models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8 (20):6003–35. doi:10.5194/acp-8-6003-2008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman, R. 1957. Dynamic programming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bondy, A. L., D. Bonanno, R. C. Moffet, B. Wang, A. Laskin, and A. P. Ault. 2018. The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18:12595–612. doi:10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, J., J. Fast, M. West, and N. Riemer. 2017. Metrics to quantify the importance of mixing state for CCN activity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17 (12):7445–58. doi:10.5194/acp-17-7445-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, J., R. A. Zaveri, R. C. Easter, N. Riemer, and J. D. Fast. 2016. A three-dimensional sectional representation of aerosol mixing state for simulating optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei. JGR. Atmospheres 121 (10):5912–29. doi:10.1002/2015JD024323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. H., and J. H. Seinfeld. 2002. Global distribution and climate forcing of carbonaceous aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (D19): AAC 14-1–AAC 14-33. doi:10.1029/2001JD001397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierce, L., T. C. Bond, S. E. Bauer, F. Mena, and N. Riemer. 2016. Black carbon absorption at the global scale is affected by particle-scale diversity in composition. Nat. Commun. 7 (1):12361. doi:10.1038/ncomms12361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fierce, L., N. Riemer, and T. C. Bond. 2017. Toward reduced representation of mixing state for simulating aerosol effects on climate. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 98 (5):971–80. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0028.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. Z. 2001. Strong radiative heating due to the mixing state of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols. Nature 409 (6821):695–7. doi:10.1038/35055518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, M. Z. 2002. Analysis of aerosol interactions with numerical techniques for solving coagulation, nucleation, condensation, dissolution, and reversible chemistry among multiple size distributions. J. Geophys. Res. 107 (D19):4366. doi:10.1029/2001JD002044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge, C. E. 1952. Die Konstitution des atmosphärischen Aerosols. Ann. Met. 5:1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, D. 2001. Transport and direct radiative forcing of carbonaceous and sulfate aerosols in the GISS GCM. J. Geophys. Res. 106 (D17):20311–32. doi:10.1029/2001JD900038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, D., M. Schulz, S. Kinne, C. McNaughton, J. Spackman, Y. Balkanski, S. Bauer, T. Berntsen, T. C. Bond, O. Boucher, et al. 2009. Evaluation of black carbon estimations in global aerosol models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9 (22):9001–26. doi:10.5194/acp-9-9001-2009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., P.-L. Ma, H. Wang, S. Tilmes, B. Singh, R. Easter, S. Ghan, and P. Rasch. 2016. Description and evaluation of a new four-mode version of the modal aerosol module (MAM4) within version 5.3 of the Community Atmosphere Model. Geosci. Model Dev. 9 (2):505–22. doi:10.5194/gmd-9-505-2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui, H., M. Koike, Y. Kondo, N. Moteki, J. D. Fast, and R. A. Zaveri. 2013. Development and validation of a black carbon mixing state resolved three-dimensional model: Aging processes and radiative impact. JGR. Atmospheres 118 (5):2304–26. doi:10.1029/2012JD018446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrook, A. M., D. M. Murphy, S.-H. Lee, D. S. Thomson, K. A. Prather, R. J. Wenzel, D.-Y. Liu, D. J. Phares, K. P. Rhoads, A. S. Wexler, et al. 2003. A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D7):8424. doi:10.1029/2001JD000660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D., J. Anderson, P. Quinn, L. McInnes, F. Brechtel, S. Kreidenweis, A. Middlebrook, M. Pósfai, D. Thomson, and P. Buseck. 1998. Influence of sea-salt on aerosol radiative properties in the Southern Ocean marine boundary layer. Nature 392 (6671):62–5. doi:10.1038/32138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshima, N., M. Koike, Y. Zhang, and Y. Kondo. 2009. Aging of black carbon in outflow from anthropogenic sources using a mixing state resolved model: 2. Aerosol optical properties and cloud condensation nuclei activities. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres 114:D18202. doi:10.1029/2008JD011681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, K. A., and K. A. Prather. 2010. Aircraft measurements of vertical profiles of aerosol mixing states. J. Geophys. Res. 115:D11305. doi:10.1029/2009JD013150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, N., A. Ault, M. West, R. Craig, and J. Curtis. 2019. Aerosol mixing state: Measurements, modeling, and impacts. Rev. Geophys. 57 (2):187–249. doi:10.1029/2018RG000615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, N., H. Vogel, B. Vogel, and F. Fiedler. 2003. Modeling aerosols on the mesoscale-γ: Treatment of soot aerosol and its radiative effects. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres 108:4601. doi:10.1029/2003jd003448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, N., and M. West. 2013. Quantifying aerosol mixing state with entropy and diversity measures. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13 (22):11423–39. doi:10.5194/acp-13-11423-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemer, N., M. West, R. A. Zaveri, and R. C. Easter. 2009. Simulating the evolution of soot mixing state with a particle-resolved aerosol model. J. Geophys. Res. 114:D09202. doi:10.1029/2008JD011073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schult, I., J. Feichter, and W. F. Cooke. 1997. Effect of black carbon and sulfate aerosols on the Global Radiation Budget. J. Geophys. Res. Atmospheres. 102 (D25):30107–17. doi:10.1029/97JD01863.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, H., D. Rose, Y. Cheng, S. Gunthe, A. Massling, M. Stock, A. Wiedensohler, M. Andreae, and U. Pöschl. 2010. Hygroscopicity distribution concept for measurement data analysis and modeling of aerosol particle mixing state with regard to hygroscopic growth and CCN activation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10 (15):7489–503. doi:10.5194/acp-10-7489-2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, R. C., and K. A. Prather. 2007. Investigations of the diurnal cycle and mixing state of oxalic acid in individual particles in Asian aerosol outflow. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41 (23):8062–9. doi:10.1021/es071134g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegen, I., and R. Miller. 1998. A general circulation model study on the interannual variability of soil dust aerosol. J. Geophys. Res. 103 (D20):25975–95. doi:10.1029/98JD02345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villani, C. 2008. Optimal transport: Old and new. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitby, E. R., and P. H. McMurry. 1997. Modal aerosol dynamics modeling. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 27 (6):673–88. doi:10.1080/02786829708965504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, P. 1973. The growth of atmospheric aerosol particles as a function of the relative humidity—II. An improved concept of mixed nuclei. J. Aerosol Sci. 4 (5):373–87. doi:10.1016/0021-8502(73)90027-X.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, L., and C. Zhao. 2023. Quantifying particle-to-particle heterogeneity in aerosol hygroscopicity. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 23 (5):3195–205. doi:10.5194/acp-23-3195-2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, S., K. N. Sartelet, R. M. Healy, and J. C. Wenger. 2016. Simulation of particle diversity and mixing state over Greater Paris: a model–measurement inter-comparison. Faraday Discuss. 189:547–66. doi:10.1039/c5fd00175g.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, S., K. N. Sartelet, and C. Seigneur. 2015. A size-composition resolved aerosol model for simulating the dynamics of externally mixed particles: SCRAM (v 1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8 (6):1595–612. doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1595-2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar