445
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Recovery Housing: Evolving Models to Address Resident Needs

, Ph.D., , Ed.D., , M.P.H. & , M.A.
Pages 352-361 | Received 02 Jan 2017, Accepted 15 May 2017, Published online: 28 Jun 2017

References

  • Borkman, T. 1998. Resident self-governance in social model recovery programs. Contemporary Drug Problems 25 (4):741–71. doi:10.1177/009145099802500405.
  • Borkman, T. J., L. A. Kaskutas, J. Room, K. Bryan, and D. Barrows. 1998. An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 (1):7–17. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00244-4.
  • Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel. 2007. What is recovery? A working definition from the Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33 (3):221–28. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2007.06.001.
  • Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. 2015. Behavioral health trends in the United States: Results from the 2014 National Survey on Drug Use and Health ( HHS Publication No. SMA 15-4927, NSDUH Series H-50). Rockville, MD: Author. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUH-FRR1-2014/NSDUH-FRR1-2014.pdf ( accessed March 1, 2016).
  • Cloud, W., and R. Granfield. 2008. Conceptualizing recovery capital: Expansion of a theoretical construct. Substance Use and Misuse 43 (12–13):1971–86. doi:10.1080/10826080802289762.
  • De Leon, G. 2000. The therapeutic community: Theory, model, and method. New York, NY: Springer.
  • De Leon, G. 2010. Is the therapeutic community an evidence-based treatment? What the evidence says. Therapeutic Communities 31 (2):104–28.
  • Dennis, M. L., and C. K. Scott. 2007. Managing addiction as a chronic condition. Addiction Science and Clinical Practice 4 (1):45–55. doi:10.1151/ascp074145.
  • Duffy, P., and H. Baldwin. 2013. Recovery post treatment: Plans, barriers and motivators. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy 8:6. doi:10.1186/1747-597X-8-6.
  • Eyrich-Garg, K. M., J. S. Cacciola, D. Carise, K. G. Lynch, and A. T. McLellan. 2008. Individual characteristics of the literally homeless, marginally housed, and impoverished in a US substance abuse treatment-seeking sample. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 43 (10):831–42. doi:10.1007/s00127-008-0371-8.
  • Ferrari, J. R., D. R. Groh, and L. A. Jason. 2009. The neighborhood environments of mutual-help recovery houses: Comparisons by perceived socio-economic status. Journal of Groups in Addiction and Recovery 4 (1–2):100–09. doi:10.1080/15560350802712470.
  • Ferrari, J. R., L. A. Jason, R. Blake, M. I. Davis, and B. D. Olson. 2006a. “This is my neighborhood”: Comparing United States and Australian Oxford House neighborhoods. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community 31 (1–2):41–49. doi:10.1300/J005v31n01_04.
  • Ferrari, J. R., L. A. Jason, M. I. Davis, B. D. Olson, and J. Alvarez. 2004. Similarities and differences in governance among residents in drug and/or alcohol misuse recovery: Self vs. staff rules and regulations. Therapeutic Communities 25 (3):185–98.
  • Ferrari, J. R., L. A. Jason, K. C. Sasser, M. I. Davis, and B. D. Olson. 2006b. Creating a home to promote recovery: The physical environments of Oxford House. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community 31 (1–2):27–39. doi:10.1300/J005v31n01_03.
  • Jacobson, J. O. 2004. Place and attrition from substance abuse treatment. Journal of Drug Issues 34 (1):23–50. doi:10.1177/002204260403400102.
  • Jason, L. A., A. A. Mericle, D. L. Polcin, and W. L. White. 2013. The role of recovery residences in promoting long-term addiction recovery. American Journal of Community Psychology 52 (3–4):406–11. doi:10.1007/s10464-013-9602-6.
  • Jason, L. A., B. D. Olson, J. R. Ferrari, and A. T. Lo Sasso. 2006. Communal housing settings enhance substance abuse recovery. American Journal of Public Health 96 (10):1727–29. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.070839.
  • Jason, L. A., B. D. Olson, J. R. Ferrari, J. M. Majer, J. Alvarez, and J. Stout. 2007. An examination of main and interactive effects of substance abuse recovery housing on multiple indicators of adjustment. Addiction 102 (7):1114–21. doi:10.1111/add.2007.102.issue-7.
  • Johnson, C. K. 2016. Addiction epidemic fuels runaway demand for “sober homes.” Chicago, IL: Associated Press. http://www.webcitation.org/6mdNgEyQC (accessed December 9, 2016).
  • Jones, C. M., J. Logan, R. M. Gladden, and M. K. Bohm. 2015. Vital signs: Demographic and substance use trends among heroin users — United States, 2002–2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64 (26):719–25.
  • Kaskutas, L. A., T. K. Greenfield, T. J. Borkman, and J. Room. 1998. Measuring treatment philosophy: A scale for substance abuse recovery programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15 (1):27–36. doi:10.1016/S0740-5472(97)00246-8.
  • Kaskutas, L. A., J. W. Keller, and J. Witbrodt. 1999. Measuring social model in California: How much has changed? Contemporary Drug Problems 26 (4):607–31.
  • Laudet, A. B., and K. Humphreys. 2013. Promoting recovery in an evolving context: What do we know and what do we need to know about recovery support services? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 45 (1):126–33. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2013.01.009.
  • Laudet, A. B., V. Stanick, and B. Sands. 2009. What could the program have done differently? A qualitative examination of reasons for leaving outpatient treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 37 (2):182–90. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.01.001.
  • Laudet, A. B., and W. White. 2010. What are your priorities right now? Identifying service needs across recovery stages to inform service development. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 38 (1):51–59. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2009.06.003.
  • McLellan, A. T., D. C. Lewis, C. P. O’Brien, and H. D. Kleber. 2000. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA 284 (13):1689–95. doi:10.1001/jama.284.13.1689.
  • Mennis, J., and M. J. Mason. 2012. Social and geographic contexts of adolescent substance use: The moderating effects of age and gender. Social Networks 34 (1):150–57.
  • Mericle, A. A., K. J. Karriker-Jaffe, S. Gupta, D. M. Sheridan, and D. L. Polcin. 2016. Distribution and neighborhood correlates of sober living house locations in Los Angeles. American Journal of Community Psychology 58 (1–2):89–99. doi:10.1002/ajcp.2016.58.issue-1pt2.
  • Mericle, A. A., J. Miles, and J. Cacciola. 2015. A critical component of the substance abuse continuum of care: Recovery homes in Philadelphia. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 47 (1):80–90. doi:10.1080/02791072.2014.976726.
  • Mericle, A. A., J. Miles, J. Cacciola, and J. Howell. 2014. Adherence to the social model approach in Philadelphia recovery homes. International Journal of Self Help and Self Care 8 (2):259–75. doi:10.2190/SH.8.2.g.
  • Mericle, A. A., J. Miles, and F. Way. 2015. Recovery residences and providing safe and supportive housing for individuals overcoming addiction. Journal of Drug Issues 45 (4):368–84. doi:10.1177/0022042615602924.
  • Molina, K. M., M. Alegría, and C.-N. Chen. 2012. Neighborhood context and substance use disorders: A comparative analysis of racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 125 (Suppl. 1):S35–S43. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.027.
  • National Association of Recovery Residences. 2012. A brief primer on recovery residences: FAQ. Atlanta, GA: Author. http://www.webcitation.org/6Mg0GCoVM ( accessed January 16, 2014).
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2012. Principles of drug addiction treatment: A research-based guide, 3rd ed. ( NIH Publication No. 12–4180). Baltimore, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health. http://www.webcitation.org/6MpROYx6t ( accessed January 22, 2014).
  • Pearson, F. S., M. L. Prendergast, D. Podus, P. Vazan, L. Greenwell, and Z. Hamilton. 2012. Meta-analyses of seven of the NIDA’s principles of drug addiction treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 43 (1):1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.10.005.
  • Polcin, D. L. 2006. Sober living houses after, during, and as an alternative to treatment. Addiction Health Services Research Conference, Little Rock, AK, October 23–25.
  • Polcin, D. L., and D. M. Henderson. 2008. A clean and sober place to live: Philosophy, structure, and purported therapeutic factors in sober living houses. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 40 (2):153–59. doi:10.1080/02791072.2008.10400625.
  • Polcin, D. L., R. Korcha, J. Bond, and G. Galloway. 2010a. Eighteen-month outcomes for clients receiving combined outpatient treatment and sober living houses. Journal of Substance Abuse 15 (5):352–66.
  • Polcin, D. L., R. Korcha, J. Bond, and G. P. Galloway. 2010b. Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 38 (4):356–65. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2010.02.003.
  • Polcin, D. L., A. Mericle, S. Callahan, R. Harvey, and L. A. Jason. 2016. Challenges and rewards of conducting research on recovery residences for alcohol and drug disorders. Journal of Drug Issues 46 (1):51–63. doi:10.1177/0022042615616432.
  • Polcin, D. L., A. Mericle, J. Howell, D. Sheridan, and J. Christensen. 2014. Maximizing social model principles in residential recovery settings. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 46 (5):436–43. doi:10.1080/02791072.2014.960112.
  • Reif, S., P. George, L. Braude, R. H. Dougherty, A. S. Daniels, S. S. Ghose, and M. E. Delphin-Rittmon. 2014. Recovery housing: Assessing the evidence. Psychiatric Services 65 (3):295–300. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201300243.
  • Room, J., and L. Kaskutas. 2008. Social Model Philosophy Scale (SMPS): Manual: Guidelines for scale administration and interpretation: Residential, non-residential & detoxification alcohol and drug programs, revised. Emeryville, CA: Alcohol Research Group.
  • Room, J., L. A. Kaskutas, and K. Piroth. 1998. A brief overview of the social model approach. Contemporary Drug Problems 25 (4):649–64. doi:10.1177/009145099802500402.
  • Rudd, R. A., N. Aleshire, J. E. Zibbell, and R. M. Gladden. 2016. Increases in drug and opioid overdose deaths—United States, 2000–2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 64 (50–51):1378–82. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6450a3.
  • Stata Corp. 2015. Stata statistical software: Release 14.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation.
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2012. SAMHSA’s working definition of recovery. Rockville, MD: Author. http://www.webcitation.org/6aRHz0R8X ( accessed July 31, 2015).
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2014. Results from the 2013 national survey on drug use and health: Summary of national findings (NSDUH Series H-48). HHS Publication No. (SMA) 14-4863. Rockville, MD: Author. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHresultsPDFWHTML2013/Web/NSDUHresults2013.pdf ( accessed February 19, 2015).
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2016. Fact sheet: The opioid epidemic: By the numbers. Washington, DC: Author. http://www.webcitation.org/6m7JsuyjM ( accessed November 18, 2016).
  • Vanderplasschen, W., K. Colpaert, M. Autriquem, R. C. Rapp, S. Pearce, E. Broekaert, and S. Vandevelde. 2013. Therapeutic communities for addictions: A review of their effectiveness from a recovery-oriented perspective. The Scientific World Journal 2013 (Article ID 427817):22. doi:10.1155/2013/427817.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.