1
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Retention and Social Promotion for the Exceptional Child

Pages 48-63 | Published online: 26 Dec 2019

References

  • Abidin, R., & Seltzer, J. (1981). Special education outcomes: Implications for implementation of Public Law 94–142. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 14, 28–31.
  • Abidin, R., Golladay, W., & Howerton, A. (1971). Elementary school retention: An unjustifiable discriminatory and noxious educational policy. Journal of School Psychology, 9, 410–414.
  • Adler, R. (1978, November). State-by-state roundup of minimum competency testing. Learning, p. 99.
  • Aiebersold, W. (1971). Retention in grade—case reports. Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 3014A. (University Microfilms No. 71–29719)
  • Ames, L. (1967). Is your child in the wrong grade? New York: Harper & Row.
  • Ammons, J. (1976). A study of the effects of non-promotion and promotion as related to achievement and self-concept of elementary students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 5011A. (University Microfilms No. 76–4617)
  • Block, J. (1971). Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Briggs, L. (1968). The impact of failure on elementary school pupils. Dissertation Abstracts International, 27, 2719A. (University Microfilms No. 67–2571)
  • Caplan, P. (1973). The role of classroom conduct in the promotion and retention of elementary school children. Journal of Experimental Education, 41, 8–11.
  • Casavantes, E. (1974). Reading achievement and in-grade retention rate differentials for Mexican-American and black students in selected states of the southwest. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 3508A. (University Microfilms No. 74–28, 425)
  • Chansky, N. (1964). Progress of promoted and repeating grade 1 failures. Journal of Experimental Education, 32, 225–237.
  • Chase, J. A. (1968). Study of the impact of grade retention on primary school children. Journal of Psychology, 70, 169–177.
  • Dobbs, V., & Neville, D. (1967). Effect of nonpromotion on the achievement of groups matched from retained first graders and promoted second graders. Journal of Educational Research, 60, 472–475.
  • Dupis, A., & Craig, R. (1963). American education: Its origins and issues. New York: Bruce Publishing Company.
  • Gagne, R., & Briggs, L. (1974). Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Goodlad, J. (1954). Some effects of promotion and nonpromotion upon the social and personal adjustment of children. Journal of Experimental Education, 22, 301–328.
  • Haddad, W. (1979). Educational and economic effects of promotion and repetition practices. (Staff Working Paper No. 319.) Washington, D.C.: World Bank (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 195 003)
  • Jackson, G. (1975). The research evidence on the effects of grade retention. Review of Educational Research, 45, 613–635.
  • Josephine, S. (1962). Promotion, a perennial problem. Education, 82, 373–376.
  • Kamii, C., & Weikart, D. (1963). Marks, achievement, and intelligence of seventh graders who are retained (non-promoted) once in elementary school. Journal of Educational Research, 56, 452–459.
  • Kraus, P. (1973). Yesterday's children. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Light, H. (1977). Light's retention scale. San Rafael, CA: Academic therapy.
  • Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1950). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Ogden, K. (1971). An evaluation of nonpromotion as a method for improving academic performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 795A. (University Microfilms No. 71–21, 484)
  • Otto, H. (1951). Grading and promotion policies. National Education Association Journal, 40, 128–129.
  • Peyton, J. (1968). Nonpromotion. Bulletin of the Bureau of School Service, University of Kentucky, 40, 9–17.
  • Piaget, J. (1970). A conversation with Jean Piaget. Psychology Today, 3, 25–32.
  • Rau, D. (1974). An analysis of policies, practices, individual criteria used and personnel involved in the nonpromotion of elementary pupils in selected schools in Pennsylvania. Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 1402A. (University Microfilms No. 74–19, 769)
  • Raygor, B. (1972). A five-year follow-up study comparing the school achievement and school adjustment of children retained in kindergarten and children placed in a transition class. Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 1526A. (University Microfilms No. 72–27, 795)
  • Reiter, R. (1973). The promotion/retention dilemma: What research tells us. (Report No. 7416) Philadelphia, PA: Philadelphia School District, Office of Research and Evaluation. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 099 412)
  • Rohwer, D., Ammon, P., & Cramer, P. (1974). Understanding intellectual development. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
  • Rose, J., Medway, F., Cantrell, V., & Marus, S. (1983). A fresh look at the retention-promotion controversy. Journal of School Psychology, 21, 201–211.
  • Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 10 (pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press.
  • Sandoval, J., & Fitzgerald, P. (1983, March). A high school follow-up of children who were nonpromoted or attended a junior first grde. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Detroit, MI.
  • Sandoval, J., & Hughes, G. (1981). Success in non-promoted first grade children. Davis, CA: University of California, Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Serice No. ED 212 371)
  • Scott, B., & Ames, J. (1969). Improved academic, personal, and social adjustment in selected primary-school repeaters. The Elementary School Journal, 689, 431–439.
  • Shuey, A. (1966). The testing of negro intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Social Science Press.
  • Stringer, L. (1960). Report on a retentions program. Elementry School Journal, 60, 370–375.
  • White, K., & Howard, J. (1973). Failure to be promoted and self-concept among elementary school children. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 7, 182–187.
  • White, G., Nielsen, G., & Johnson, S. (1972). Time-out duration and the suppression of deviant behavior in children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 5, 111–120.
  • Worth, W., & Shores, J. (1960). Does non-promotion improve achievement in the language arts? Elementary English, 37, 49–52.
  • Worth, W. (1965). Promotion or non-promotion. In M. Hillson & R. Hyman (Eds.), Elementary school organization. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.