Multidisciplinary Teams and Group Decision-Making Techniques: Possible Solutions to Decision-Making Problems

References

• Abelson, M. A., & Woodman, R. W. (1983). Review of research on team effectiveness: Implications for teams in schools. School Psychology Review, 12, 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Armer, B., & Thomas, B. (1978). Attitudes toward interdisciplinary collaboration in pupil personnel services. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersoff, D. N. (1982). The legal regulation of school psychology. In C. R. Reynolds, & T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Black, B. J. (1977). The teams gallop through the catchment areas. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28, 917–918.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boje, D. M., & Murhighan, J. K. (1982). Group confidence pressures in iterative decisions. Management Science, 28, 1187–1196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N. C. (1972). Studies in the quality of life: Delphi and decision making. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7, 466–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1982). Guidelines for conducting NGT meetings. In D. R. Hampton, C. E. Sumner, & R. A. Webber (Eds.), Organizational behavior and the practice of management. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, K. S., Yoshida, R. K., Maxwell, J. P., & Kaufman, M. T. (1979). Recognition of team goals: An essential step toward rational decision-making. Exceptional Children, 45, 638–644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliam, J. E. (1979). Contributions and status rankings of educational planning committee participants. Exceptional Children, 45, 466–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbaum, J., & Rucker, C. (1977). Assessment data and the child study team. In J. A. C. Vautour & C. N. Rucher (Eds.), Child study team training program: Book of readings. Austin, TX: Special Education Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, S., Strickland, B., Turnbull, A. P., & Curry, L. (1980). An observational analysis of the IEP conference. Exceptional Children, 46, 278–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T. B. (1975). An empirical analysis of nominal and interacting groups. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. G., & Taber, T. D. (1980). The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 97–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, D. H., Shukla, R. K., Delbecq, A. L., & Walster, G. W. (1973). A comparative study of differences in subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, delphi groups, and nominal groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 280–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. R., Rohrbaugh, J., Mumower, J., & Adelman, L. (1977). Social judgement theory: Applications in policy information. In M. F. Kaplan & S. Schwartz (Eds.), Human judgement and decision processes in applied settings. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, I., Duffey, J., Caroll, R., Manni, J., & Winikur, D. (1973). Patterns of interprofessional conflict resolution on school child study teams. Journal of School Psychology, 11, 187–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. L., & Reynolds, C. R. (1984). Group problem-solving. In R. Lorsin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Larry P. v. Riles, 343 R. Supp. 1306 (N. D. Cal. 1972).
   Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A. (1981). Decision Analysis: An approach for multidisciplinary teams in planning special service programs. Journal of School Psychology, 19, 340–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A., & Hawryluk, M. K. (1983). Framework and guidelines for utilization of teams in schools. School Psychology Review, 12, 180–185.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (1980). The school-based interprofessional team: Recurring problems and some possible solutions. Journal of School Psychology, 18, 388–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (1981a). Facilitating effective team decision-making. In M. P. Gaasholt (Ed.), Organizing for Change. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Program Development Assistance System.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I. (1981b). The problems facing multidisciplinary teams: As perceived by team members. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 330–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, S. I., & Heffernan, L. (1984). Improving multi-disciplinary team functions. In C. A. Maher, R. J. Illback, & J. E. Zins (Eds.), Organizational Psychology in the Schools. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. J. (1980). Psychological evidence in the Larry P. opinion: A case of the right problem-wrong solution? School Psychology Review, 9, 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., Gutkin, T. B., Elliott, S. N., & Witt, J. C. (1984). School psychology: Essentials of theory and practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrbaugh, J. (1979). Improving the quality of group judgement: Social judgement analysis and the delphi technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 73–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbaugh, J. (1981). Improving the quality of group judgement: Social judgement analysis and the nominal group technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 28, 272–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatino, D. A. (1972). School psychology — special education: To acknowledge a relationship. Journal of School Psychology, 10, 99–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J., Bossard, M., & Watkins, M. (1977). Effects of parental presence on attendance and input of interdisciplinary teams in an institutional setting. Psychological Reports, 41, 1031–1034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, B. Y., Michaelsen, L. K., & Franklin, S. G. (1982). An empirical test of the nominal group technique in state solar energy planning. Group & Organization Studies, 7, 320–334.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Ven, A. H., & Delbecq, A. L. (1974). The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 605–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, G. (1976). Interdisciplinary efforts in learning disabilities: Issues and recommendations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 59–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. E., Dittrich, J. E., & Lang, J. R. (1980). The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situational complexity on implementation attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 428–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wing, H., & Sarsley, V. (1971). The rehabilitation of staffing conference in an extended care facility. Geriatrics, 26, 144–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W. (1981). Use of the Nominal Group Technique for idea generation and decision making. Texas Business Executive, 7, 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, R. W., & Sherwood, J. J. (1980). The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 166–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. K. (1980). Multidisciplinary decision-making in special education: A review of issues. School Psychology Review, 9, 221–227.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida, R. K., Fenton, K. S., Maxwell, J. P., & Kaufman, M. J. (1978). Group decision-making in the planning team process: Myth or reality? Journal of School Psychology, 16, 237–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar