12
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Does Anyone Care What Happens After the Refer-Test-Place Sequence: The Systematic Evaluation of Special Education Program Effectiveness

Pages 49-58 | Published online: 23 Dec 2019

References

  • Baker, K., & Pelavin, S. (1984). Implications for evaluation models from bilingual evaluations. Unpublished paper.
  • Becker, W., & Engelmann, S. (1976). Teaching 3: Evaluation of Instruction. Chicago: SRA.
  • Brandl, J. (1983). The effectiveness of special education: A survey. Policy Studies Review, 2, (1), 65–70.
  • Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Special Education, 14, (3), 295–309.
  • Carver, R. P., (1974). Two dimensions of tests: Psychometric and edumetric. American Psychologist, 29, 512–518.
  • Clymer, T., & Fenn, T. (1979). Ginn Reading 720, Rainbow Edition. Lexington, MA: Ginn & Co.
  • Cromwell, R., Blashfield, R., & Strauss, J. (1975). Criteria for classification systems (pp. 5–24). In N. Hobbs, (Ed.), Issues in the classification of children (vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Deno, S., Marston, D., Mirkin, P., Lowry, L., Sindelar, P., & Jenkins, J. (1982). The use of standard tasks to measure achievement in reading, spelling, and written expression: A normative and developmental study (Research Report No. 87). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
  • Deno, S., Marston, D., Shinn, M., & Tindal, G. (1983). Oral reading fluency: A simple datum for scaling reading disability. Topics in Learning and Learning Disability, 2, (4), 53–59.
  • Deno, S., Mirkin, P., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, (1), 36–45.
  • Deno, S., Mirkin, P., & Wesson, C. (1984). How to write effective data-based IEP's. Teaching Exceptional Children, 99–104.
  • Gerber, M., & Semmel, M. (1984). Teachers as imperfect tests: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, (3), 137–148.
  • Glass, G. (1983). Effectiveness of Special Education. Policy Studies Review, 2, (1), 65–79.
  • Goldwasser, E., Meyers, J., Christenson, S., & Graden, J. (1984). The impact of PL 94–142 on the practice of school psychology: A national survey. Psychology in the Schools, 20, 153–165.
  • Haynes, M., & Jenkins, J. (undated). Reading instruction in special education resource rooms. Unpublished paper.
  • Heller, K., Holtzman, W., & Messick, S. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Hughes, J. (1979). Consistency of administrators and psychologists actual and ideal perceptions of school psychologists' activities. Psychology in the Schools, 16, (2), 234–239.
  • Keogh, B., Kukic, S., Becker, L., McLoughlin, R., & Kukic, M. (1975). School psychologists' services in special education programs. Journal of School Psychology, 13, 142–148.
  • Lakin, K. C. (1983). A response to Gene V. Glass. Policy Studies Review, 2, (1), 65–79.
  • Legare, T. (1980). Evaluating educational programs when experimental design is inappropriate. Educational Research Quarterly, 5, (2), 39–49.
  • Lynn L. (1983). The emerging system for educating handicapped children. Policy Studies Review, 2, (1), 21–58.
  • Macchiarola, F., & Bailey, R. (1983). Special education: The cost of experimentation. Policy Studies Review, 2, (1), 137–146.
  • Maher, C., & Bennett, R. (1984). Planning and evaluation special education services. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Marston, D., & Deno, S. (1982). Implementation of direct and repeated measurement in the school setting (Research Report No. 106). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 226 048).
  • Marston, D., Deno, S., & Tindal, G. (1983). Eligibility for learning disabilities services: A direct and repeated approach. Exceptional Children, 50, (6), 554–555.
  • Marston, D., Lowry, L., Deno, S., & Mirkin, P. (1981). An analysis of learning trends in simple measures of reading, spelling, and written expression: A longitudinal study. (Research Report No. 49). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
  • Marston, D., Tindal, G., & Deno, S. (1983). A comparison of standardized achievement tests and direct measurement techniques in measuring student progress. (Research Report No. 126). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
  • Matuszek, P. (1978). Designing internally-based program evaluations in school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 346–355.
  • Mercer, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1977). Designing diagnostic-intervention programs. In T. Oakland, (Ed.), Psychological and educational assessment of minority children. NY: Bruner-Mazel, p. 70–90.
  • Minnesota Legislative Audit (1984.). Evaluation of special education. St. Paul, MN: Office of the Legislative Auditor, Program Evaluation Division.
  • Oakland, T. (1977). Psychological and educational assessment of minority children. NY: Bruner-Mazel.
  • Oakland, T., & Matuszek, P. (1977). Using tests in a non-discriminatory fashion, (pp. 52–69). In T. Oakland (Ed.), Psychological and educational assessment of minority children. NY: Bruner-Mazel.
  • Reschly, D. (1982). Assessing mild mental retardation: The influence of adaptive behavior, socio-cultural status and prospects for non-biased assessment (pp. 229–242). In C. Reynolds and T. Gutkin (Eds.), Handbook of School Psychology. NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Sanders, J. (1978). School professionals and the evaluation function. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 301–311.
  • Stedman, D. (1983). How can special education be coordinated with other service systems? Policy Studies Review, 2, (1), 113–145.
  • Tallmadge, G. & Horst, D. (1975). A procedural guide for validating achievement gains in educational projects. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
  • Thurlow, M., Graden, J., Greener, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1983). LD and non-LD students' opportunities to learn. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 6, 172–183.
  • Tindal. G. (1985). Investigating the effectiveness of special education: An analysis of methodology. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, (2), 101–112.
  • Tindal, G., Germann, G., & Deno, S. (1983). Descriptive research on the Pine County norms: A compilation of findings (Research Report No. 132). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
  • Tindal, G., Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Shinn, M., Deno, S., & Germann, G. (1985). Empirical validation of criterion-referenced tests. Educational Researcher, 78, 203–209.
  • Tindal, G., Marston, D., & Deno, S. (1983). The reliability of direct and repeated measurement (Research Report No. 123). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities.
  • Ysseldyke, J., & Regan, R. (1980). Non-discriminatory assessment: A formative model. Exceptional Children, 6, 16–27.
  • Ysseldyke, J., & Thurlow, M. (1984). Assessment practices in special education: Adequacy and appropriateness. Educational Psychologist, 9, 123–136.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.