A Comparison of Group Contingencies for Increasing Spelling Performance Among Sixth Grade Students

References

• Axelrod, S. (1973). Comparison of individual and group contingencies in two special classes. Behavior Therapy, 4, 83–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, G. C., & Richards, H. C. (1980). An interdependent group-oriented system for improving academic performance. School Psychology Review, 9, 190–193.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, P. M., Gresham, F. M., & Wright, W. R. (1985). Interdependent and independent group contingencies with immediate and delayed reinforcement for controlling classroom behavior. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 177–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabman, R. S., Spitalnik, R., & Spitalnik, K. (1974). Sociometric and disruptive behavior as a function of four types of token reinforcement programs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, S. N., Turco, T. L., Evans, S. E., & Gresham, F. M. (1984). Group contingency interventions: Children's acceptability ratings. Paper presented at the 18th annual convention of the Association for Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M., & Gresham, G. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, L. A. (1976). The use of group contingencies for behavioral control: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 628–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, B. E. (1985). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research design. New York: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E., & Geesey, S. (1977). Simultaneous-treatment design comparisons of the effects of earning reinforcers for one's peers versus oneself. Behavior Therapy, 8, 682–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Alden, K., Demuth, D., Dawson, D., Panicucci, P., Arntson, N., McMurray, J., Hempstead, J., & Levin, J. (1974). A further consideration in the application of an analysis-of-variance model for the intrasubject replication design. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 629–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, T. F. (1974). A review of applications of group-contingency procedures in behavior modification in the regular classroom: Some recommendations for school personnel. Psychological Reports, 35, 1299–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, T. F. (1981). The effects of individual and group contingencies on reading performance of special education students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 76–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, T. F. (1982). A comparison of individual and group contingencies on spelling performance with special education students. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 4, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• McReynolds, W. T., Gange, J. J., & Speltz, M. L. (1981). Effects of multiple individual and group operant contingencies on student performance. Education and Treatment of Children, 4, 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., Heggie, D. L., & Clement, P. W. (1984). A student-administered group-oriented contingency intervention. Its efficacy in a regular classroom. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 6, 41–56.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Albright, T. S., & Ager, C. L. (1986). Group versus individual contingencies in modifying two disruptive adolescents' behavior. Professional School Psychology, 1, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Lentz, F. E., & Sofman, R. (1985). Validity of rating scales in assessing aggressive behavior in classroom settings. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 69–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shores, R. E., Apollini, T., & Norman, C. W. (1976). Changes in peer verbalizations accompanying individual and group contingencies to modify on-task behavior. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43, 1155–1162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Witt, J. C., & Elliott, S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In T. R. Kratochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology, Vol IV (pp. 251–288). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar