Self-Managed Groups: Fitting Self-Management Approaches into Classroom Systems

REFERENCES

• Annis, L. F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2, 39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Baer, D. M. (1984). Does research on self-control need more control? Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 4, 211–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrientos, T. (1991, July 5). Figures on city's public schools tell a tale of failure. The Philadelphia Inquirer, pp. 1, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Benward, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, T. S., & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children's perceptions of friendship as supportive relationships. Developmental Psychology, 22, 640–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (in press). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., & Polite, K. (1990). School-based, behavioral self-management: A review and analysis. School Psychology Quarterly, 5, 180–198.
   Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., Polite, K., & Grayson, N. (1990). An evaluation of reciprocal peer tutoring across elementary school settings. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 209–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fantuzzo, J. W., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Azar, S. T. (1987). A component analysis of behavioral self-management interventions with elementary school students. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 9, 33–43.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. C., & Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17, 258–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, K., & Monahan, J. (1977). Psychology and community change. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J., & Jenkins, L. (1985). Peer tutoring in elementary and secondary programs. Focus on Exceptional Children, 17, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. T., Nelson, R. E., & Kazdin, A. E. (1977). The role of external variables in self-reinforcement. Behavior Modification, 1, 147–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, C. A., & Zins, J. E. (1987). Psychoeducational interventions in the schools: Methods and procedures for enhancing student competence. New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., & Witt, J. C. (1988). Expanding the scope of behavioral consultation: A systems approach to classroom behavior change. Professional School Psychology, 3, 271–281.
   Google Scholar
• Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Clement, P. W. (1986). The effect of reciprocal tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance and peer rankings of elementary school students in three regular classrooms. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., Heggie, D. L., & Clement, P. W. (1985). A student-administered group-oriented contingency intervention: Its efficacy in a regular classroom. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 6, 41–55.
   Google Scholar
• Pigott, H. E., & Heggie, D. L. (1986). Interpreting the conflicting results of individual versus group contingencies in classrooms: The targeted behavior as a mediating variable. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 7, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Reschly, D. J. (1988). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, M. S., & Drabman, R. S. (1979). Self-control training in the classroom: A review and critique. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 467–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1980). Effects of student teams and peer tutoring on academic achievement and time on-task. Journal of Experimental Education, 48, 252–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1990). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 19, 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulzer-Azaroff, B., & Mayer, G. R. (1986). Achieving educational excellence using behavioral strategies. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Whiting, B. B., & Whiting, J. W. M. (1975). Children of six cultures: A psychocultural analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Wolfe, P. (1986). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance and social status of underachieving elementary school children. Behavior Therapy, 17, 253–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J. A., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Wolters, C. F. (1984). Student-administered group-oriented contingencies: A method of combining group-oriented contingencies and self-directed behavior to increase academic productivity. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 6, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. F., Pigott, H. E., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Clement, P. W. (1984). Student-administered group-oriented contingencies: The application of self-regulation techniques in the context of a group to increase academic productivity. Techniques: A Journal for Counseling and Remedial Education, 1, 14–22.
   Google Scholar