8
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Improving General Education Instruction: Relevance to School Psychologists

Pages 351-371 | Published online: 22 Dec 2019

REFERENCES

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Alessi, G. (1988). Direct observation methods for emotional/behavioral problems. In E. Shapiro & T. Kratochwill (Eds.), Behavioral assessment in schools: Conceptual foundations and practical applications (pp. 14–75). New York: Guilford.
  • Allington, R. L. (1994). What's special about special programs for children who find learning to read difficult. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 95–115.
  • Arias, M. B. (1986, November). The context of education for Hispanic students: An overview. American Journal of Education, 26–57.
  • Bailey, D. B., & McWilliam, R. A. (1990). Normalizing early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 10(2), 33–47.
  • Bailey, D. B., & Simeonsson, R. J. (1988). Home-based early intervention. In S. Odom & M. Karnes, Early intervention for infants and young children with handicaps: An empirical base (pp. 199–215). Baltimore: Brookes.
  • Bailey, D. B., & Wolery, M. (1992). Teaching infants and preschoolers with disabilities (2nd ed.). New York: Merrill.
  • Bardon, J. I. (1988). Alternative educational delivery approaches: Implications for school psychology. In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. C. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 563–571). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Bijou, S., & Baer, D. M. (1961). Child development I: A systematic, and empirical theory. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
  • Brederkamp, S. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
  • Bricker, D. D. (1978). A rationale for the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped preschool children. In M. Guralnick (Ed.), Early intervention and the integration of handicapped and nonhandicapped children (pp. 3–26). Baltimore: University Park Press.
  • Bricker, D. D., & Cripe, J. W. (1992). An activity-based approach to early intervention. Baltimore-Brookes.
  • Brigham, T. (1992). A brief commentary on the future of self-management interventions in education. School Psychology Review, 21(2), 264–270.
  • Calfee, R. C., & Drum, P. (1986). Research on teaching reading. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 804–809). New York: Macmillan.
  • Canter, A. (1991). Effective psychological services for all students: A data-based model of service delivery. In G. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 49–78). Silver Spring, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Canter, A., & Marston, D. (1994, March). From CBM to discrepancy formulae to problem solving. NASP Communiqué.
  • Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century: The report of the task force on education of young adolescents. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
  • Carnine, D. (1992, Spring). The missing link in improving schools — reforming educational leaders. Direct Instruction News, 25–35.
  • Carta, J. J., Atwater, J. B., Schwartz, I. S., & Miller, P. A. (1990). Applications of ecobehavioral analysis to the study of transitions across early education. Education and Treatment of Young Children, 13, 298–315.
  • Carta, J. J., Schwartz, I. S., Atwater, J. B., & McConnell, S. R. (1991). Developmentally appropriate practice: Appraising its usefulness for young children with disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 11, 1–20.
  • Center for the Study of Social Policy. (1991). Kids count data book. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Christenson, S. L., Ysseldyke, J. I., & Thurlow, M. L. (1989). Critical instructional factors for students with mild handicaps: An integrative review. Remedial and Special Education, 10(5), 21–31.
  • Costenbader, V., Swartz, J., & Petrix, L. (1992). Consultation in the schools: The relationship between preservice training, perception of consultative skills, and actual time spent in consultation. School Psychology Review, 21(1), 95–108.
  • Council for Exceptional Children. (1994). Statistical profile of special education in the United States. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 26(3), 1–4.
  • Crowe, M. J. (1990). Theories of the world from antiquity to the Copernican revolution. New York: Dover Publishing.
  • Curtis, J. J., & Batsche, G. M. (1991). Meeting the needs of children and families: Opportunities and challenges for school psychology training programs. School Psychology Review, 20(4), 565–577.
  • Durkin, D. D. (1979). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 481–533.
  • Elkind, D. (1981). The hurried child. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction. New York: Irvington Publishers.
  • Fish, M. C., & Margolis, H. (1988). Training and practice of school psychologists in reading assessment and intervention. Journal of School Psychology, 26(4), 399–404.
  • Gable, R. A., & Hendrickson, J. M. (1990). Assessing students with special needs: A sourcebook for analyzing and correcting errors in academics. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  • Gardner, R., Sainato, D. M., Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., Heward, W. L., Eshleman, J., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior performance. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Greenwood, C. R. (1991). A longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–535.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1989). Longitudinal effects of classwide peer tutoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 371–383.
  • Greenwood, C. R. (1993). Ecobehavioral assessment system for schools: Technical manual and software. Kansas City, KS: Juniper Gardens Children's Project, University of Kansas.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Hart, B., Walker, D., & Risley, T. R. (1994). The opportunity to respond and academic performance revisited: A behavioral theory of developmental retardation and its prevention. In R. Gardner et al. (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurably superior performance (pp. 213–239). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Grossen, B. (1993). Child-directed teaching methods: A discriminatory practice of western education. Effective School Practices, 12, 9–20.
  • Gutierrez, R., & Slavin, R. E. (1992). Achievement effects of the non-graded elementary school: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 62(4), 377–411.
  • Hayes, S. C., Nelson, R. O., & Jarrett, R. B. (1987). The treatment utility of assessment: A functional approach to evaluating assessment quality. American Psychologist, 42(11), 963–974.
  • Howell, K. W., Fox, S. L., & Morehead, M. K. (1993). Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making (2nd ed.) Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
  • Hutton, J. B., Dubes, R., & Muir, S. (1992). Assessment practices of school psychologists: Ten years later. School Psychology Review, 21(2), 271–284.
  • Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1988). A design-of-instruction analysis of concept teaching in five basal language programs: Violations from the bottom up. Journal of Special Education, 22(2), 199–219.
  • Jitendra, A. K., & Kameenui, E. J. (1993). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: A description and analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 14(5), 6–18.
  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447.
  • Kelly-Vance, L., & Ulman, J. (1994, March). The changing role of school psychologists in Iowa. NASP Communiqué.
  • Lentz, F. E., & Shapiro, E. S. (1986). Functional assessment of the academic environment. School Psychology Review, 15(3), 346–357.
  • Linder, T. (1983). Early childhood special education: Program development and administration. Baltimore: Brookes.
  • Marston, D., & Magnusson, D. (1988). Curriculum-based assessment: District-level implementation. In J. Graden, J. Zins, & M. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students (pp. 137–172). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • McConnell, S., Peterson, C., Ousdigian, C., O'Neill, P., Miller, S., Priest, J., & Shrago, M. (1991, November). EPIC: Ecobehavioral programming for individual children — A program description. Symposium presented at the International Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs, Division of Early Childhood, Council for Exceptional Children, St. Louis, MO.
  • McGill-Franzen, A., & Allington, R. L. (1991a). Every child's right: Literacy (commentary). Reading Teacher, 45(2), 86–90.
  • McGill-Franzen, A., & Allington, R. L. (1991b). The gridlock of low reading achievement: Perspectives on practice and policy. Remedial and Special Education, 12(3), 20–30.
  • Miller, G. A., & Gildea, P. M. (1987). How children learn words. Scientific American, 257(3), 94–99.
  • Nagy, W. E., Herman, P. A., & Anderson, R. C. (1985). Learning words from context. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 233–253.
  • National Assessment of Educational Progress. (1991). Trends in academic progress: Achievement of American students in science, 1969–70 to 1990, mathematics, 1973–1990, reading, 1971 to 1990, writing, 1984 to 1990. Washington, DC: Author.
  • National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1989). Appropriate education in the primary grades. Washington, DC: Author.
  • National Center for Educational Statistics. (1992). The condition of education report. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Newman, J. M., & Church, S. M. (1991). Ways to misread whole language. The Reading Teacher, 44, 20–26.
  • Odom, S. L., & Karnes, M. B. (1988). Early intervention for infants and young children with handicaps: An empirical base. Baltimore: Brookes.
  • Odom, S. L., & McClean, M. (in press). Best practices in early intervention and early childhood special education. Reston, VA: Division of Early Childhood, Council for Exceptional Children.
  • Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education. (1991). Youth Indicators. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Office of Research, Office of Educational Research and Improvement of the U.S. Department of Education. (1992). Meeting goal 3: How well are we doing? (OR 92–3071). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Peterson, N. (1987). Early intervention for handicapped and at-risk children. Denver: Love.
  • Pressley, M. (1993, August). State-of-the-science primary grades reading instruction or whole language. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
  • Pressley, M. (in press). State-of-the-science primary grades reading instruction or whole language. Journal of Educational Psychology.
  • Reschly, D. J., Genshaft, J., & Binder, M. S. (1987). The 1986 NASP survey: Comparison of practitioners, NASP leadership, and university faculty on key issues. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Reschly, D. J., & Grimes, J. P. (1990). Best practices in intellectual assessment. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology-II (pp. 425–440). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Reschly, D. J., & Grimes, J. P. (1991). State department and university cooperation: Evaluation of continuing education in consultation and curriculum-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 20, 519–526.
  • Roser, N., & Juel, C. (1982). Effects of vocabulary instruction on reading comprehension. In J. Niles & L. Harris (Eds.), New inquiries in reading research and instruction (pp. 110–118). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
  • Sainato, D. M., & Carta, J. (1992). Classroom influences on the development of social competence in young children with disabilities. In S. L. Odom, S. McConnell, & M. McEvoy (Eds.), Social competence of young children with disabilities: Nature, development, and intervention (pp. 93–112). New York: Brookes.
  • Sainato, D. M., Strain, P. S., Lefebvre, D., & Rapp, N. (1990). Effects of self-evaluation on the independent work skills of preschool children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 56, 540–549.
  • Salvia, J., & Hughes, C. (1990). Curriculum-based assessment: Assessing what is taught. New York: Macmillan.
  • Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1991). Assessment in special and remedial education (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Shapiro, E. S., & Lentz, F. E. (1985). Assessing academic behavior: A behavioral approach. School Psychology Review, 14, 325–338.
  • Skinner, B. F. (1954). Science and human behavior. New York: Free Press.
  • Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Karweit, N. L., Dolan, L., & Wasik, B. A. (1992). Success for all: A relentless approach to prevention and early intervention in elementary schools. Arlington, VA: Educational Research Service.
  • Smith, D. K. (1984). Practicing school psychologists: Their characteristics, activities, and populations served. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 15, 798–810.
  • Stahl, S. A. (1989). Riding the pendulum: A rejoinder to Schickedanz and McGee and Lomax. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 141–151.
  • Stahl, S. A., & Miller, P. D. (1989). Whole language and language experience approaches for beginning reading: A quantitative research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 87–116.
  • Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1985). Integration of students with severe handicaps into regular schools. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
  • Stoner, G., Shinn, M. R., & Walker, H. M. (1991). Interventions for academic and behavior problems. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
  • Strain, P. S., McConnell, S. R., Carta, J. A., Fowler, S. A., Neisworth, J. T., & Wolery, M. (1992). Behaviorism in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 12, 121–141.
  • Tindal, G., & Marston, D. (1990). Classroom based assessment: Evaluating educational outcomes. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
  • Tilly, W. D., Grimes, J., & Reschly, D. J. (1993, September). Special education reform: The Iowa story. NASP Communiqué.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (1993). Fifteenth annual report to congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
  • Vanderbilt-Minnesota Social Interaction Project. (1993). Play time/Social time: Organizing your classroom to build interaction skills. Phoenix: Communication Skill Builders.
  • Walker, D., Greenwood, C. R., Hart, B., & Carta, J. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development, 65, 606–621.
  • Wang, M. C., Reynolds, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). Special education: Research and practice: Synthesis of findings. New York: Pergamon Press.
  • Wasik, B. A., & Slavin, R. E. (1993). Preventing early reading failure with one-to-one tutoring: A review of five programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 179–200.
  • White, T. G., Graves, M. F., & Slater, W. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 281–290.
  • Ysseldyke, J. E., Algozzine, B., & Thurlow, M. (1992). Critical issues in special education. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. (1993). The Instructional Environments Scale-Revised (TIES-R). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
  • Ysseldyke, J. E., O'Sullivan, P. J., Thurlow, M. L., & Christenson, S. L. (1989). Qualitative differences in reading and math instruction received by handicapped students. Remedial and Special Education, 10(1), 14–20.
  • Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M., Mecklenburg, C., & Graden, J. (1984). Opportunity to learn for regular and special education students during reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 5, 29–37.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.