Assessing Reading and Spelling Skills

REFERENCES

• Aaron, P. G. (1989). Dyslexia and hyperlexia. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Aaron, P. G. (1991). Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron, P. G., & Joshi, R. M. (1992). Reading problems: Consultation and remediation. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balow, I. H., Farr, R. C., & Hogan, T. P. (1993). Metropolitan Achievement Tests—Seventh Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, J., Treiman, R., Wilf, F., & Kellman, P. (1980). Spelling and reading by rules. In U. Frith (Ed.), Cognitive processes in spelling (pp. 160–194). London, UK: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, J. (1980). Developmental strategies of spelling competence in primary school children. In E. H. Henderson & J. W. Beers (Eds.), Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell (pp. 3–21). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bemridge, T. (1994). A multilayered assessment package. In S. W. Vallencia, E. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and policies (pp. 167–184). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelson, P. (1987). The onset of literacy: Cognitive processes in reading acquisition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blachman, B. (1988). An alternative classroom reading program for learning-disabled and other low-achieving children. In W. Ellis (Ed.), Intimacy with language: A forgotten basic in teacher education (pp. 49–55). Baltimore, MD: The Orton Dyslexia Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. (1985). Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, P., & Roe, B. (1993). Informal Reading Inventory (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Calfee, R. C., Venezky, R. L., & Chapman, R. S. (1969). Pronunciation of synthetic words with predictable and nonpredictable letter-sound correspondence (Tech. Rep. No. 111). Research and Development Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Carillo, M. (1994). Development of phonological awareness and reading acquisition: A study in Spanish language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 279–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cary, L., & Verhaeghe, A. (1994). Promoting phonemic analysis ability among kindergarteners: Effects of different training programs. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 251–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossu, G., Shankweiler, D., Liberman, I. Y., Tola, G., & Katz, L. (1988). Awareness of phonological segments and reading ability in Italian children. Applied Psychology, 9, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• CTB/McGraw Hill. (1985). California Achievement Test. Monterey, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Das, J. P., Naglieri, J. A., & Kirby, J. R. (1994). Assessment of cognitive processes: The PASS theory of intelligence. New York: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Defior, S., & Tudela, P. (1994). Effect of phonological training on reading and writing acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 299–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Manrique, A. M., & Gramigna, S. (1984). La segmentacion fonologica y' silabica en ninos de preescolar y' primer grado. Lect. y' Vida, 5, 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Duker, S. (1965). Listening and reading. Elementary School Journal, 65, 321–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Durrell, D. D., & Catterson, J. (1980). Durrell Analysis of Reading Ability. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (vol. 2; pp. 383–417). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ekwall, E. E., & Shanker, J. L. (1993). Ekwall and Shanker Reading Inventory (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Flynt, E. S., & Cooter, R. B. (1993). Flynt and Cooter Reading Inventory for the classroom. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, U. (Ed.). (1980). Cognitive processes in spelling. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, E. F., Rudman, H. C., Larnsen, B., & Merwin, J. C. (1982). Stanford Achievement Test (7th ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, A. I. (1922). The psychology of reading and spelling with special reference to disability. Teachers College Contributions to Education (No. 129). New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Gates, A. I., McKillop, A. S., & Horowitz, E. C. (1981). Gates-McKillop Reading Diagnostic Tests. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gentry, J. R. (1982). An analysis of developmental spelling in Gnys at Wrk. The Reading Teacher, 36, 192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, J. V., & Gilmore, E. C. (1968). Gilmore Oral Reading Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M., Burke, C. L., & Watson, D. (1987). Reading miscue inventory: Alternative procedures. Chicago, IL: Richard C. Owen.
   Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J. (1994). Literacy portfolios: Windows on potential. In S. W. Valencia, E. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (pp. 26–40). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. H. (1980). Word knowledge and reading disability. In E. H. Henderson & J. W. Beers (Eds.), Developmental and cognitive aspects of learning to spell (pp. 161–185). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., & Calfee, R. C. (1992). Assessing literacy: From standardized tests to portfolios and performances. In S. J. Samuels & A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 70–100). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., Valencia, S. W., & Afflerbach, P. P. (1994). Definitions and perspectives. In S. W. Valencia, E. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (pp. 6–21). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hieronymous, A. N., Hoover, H. D., & Lindquist, E. F. (1990). Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Chicago, IL: The Riverside Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, W., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idol, L., Nevin, A., & Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. (1986). Models of curriculum-based assessment. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (1991). Developmental reading and spelling disabilities: Are these dissociable? In R. M. Joshi (Ed.), Written language disorders (pp. 1–24). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, R. M., & Leong, C. K. (Ed.). (1994). Reading disabilities: Diagnosis and component processes. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1987). The psychology of reading and language comprehension. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Kapinus, B. A., Collier, G. V., & Kruglanski, H. (1994). The Maryland school performance assessment program: A new view of assessment. In S. W. Valencia, E. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (pp. 255–276). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, B., Madden, R., & Gardner, E. (1984). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, D. K. (1971). Training with the cloze procedure visually and auditorily to improve the reading and listening comprehension of third grade underachieving readers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Kozminsky, E. (1977). Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 491–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, I. Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F. W., & Carter, B. (1974). Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18, 201–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindamood, C., & Lindamood, P. (1979). Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. B. (1991). Complex performance based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher, 20, 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I. (1988). Lack of phonological awareness: A critical factor in developmental dyslexia. In C. von Euler, I. Lundberg, & G. Lennerstrand (Eds.), Brain and reading (pp. 221–231). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Peterson, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1989). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Peabody Individual Achievement Test (Revised). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (1994). Commentary on literacy portfolios: Windows on potential. In S. W. Valencia, E. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and possibilities (pp. 41–45). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C. (1993). Spelling error analysis: Beyond the phonetic/dysphonetic dichotomy. Annals of Dyslexia, 43, 174–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J., McCleod, C., Hunt, E., & Davidson, J. (1985). Information processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 59–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., & Hogaboam, T. (1975). Relationship between single word decoding and reading comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 461–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rack, J. P., Snowling, M. J., & Olson, R. K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: A review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 28–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer, J. M., Kulhavy, R. W., Lee, J. B., & Peterson, S. E. (1986). The sentence verification technique as a measure of listening comprehension. Educational and Psychological Research, 6, 299–313.
   Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. S. (1991). Assessment (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1989). Phonology and reading disability. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S. (1989). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, L. S. (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 469–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvaroli, N. J. (1994). Classroom Reading Inventory (7th ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
   Google Scholar
• Slosson, R. L. (1990). Slosson Orla Reading Test-Revised. East Aurora, NY: Slosson Educational Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Snowling, M. J. (1980). The development of graphemephoneme correspondence in normal and dyslexic readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 29, 294–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spache, G. D. (1940). Characteristic errors of good and poor readers. Journal of Educational Research, 34, 182–189.
   Google Scholar
• Spache, G. D. (1981). Diagnostic Reading Scales. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Spring, C., & French, L. (1990). Identifying children with specific reading disabilities from listening and reading discrepancy scores. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 53–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S., & Fairbanks, M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: A model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Cramer, B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task compatibility. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorndike, R. L. (1973). Reading comprehension education in fifteen countries: An empirical study. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, R. J., Carter, M. A., & Desai, L. E. (1991). Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom. Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., & Bryant, B. R. (1994). Test of Phonological Awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Trabasso, T. (1981). Can we integrate research and instruction on reading comprehension? In C. M. Santa & B. L. Hayes (Ed.), Children's prose comprehension (pp. 25–36). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., Hiebert, E. H., & Afflerbach, P. P. (Eds.). (1994). Authentic reading assessment: Practices and policies. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., & Place, N. A. (1994). Literacy portfolios for teaching, learning, and accountability: The Bellevue Literacy Assessment Project. In S. W. Valencia, E. H. Hiebert, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Authentic reading assessment: Practices and policies (pp. 134–156). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky, R. (1976). Theoretical and experimental base for teaching reading. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Waters, G., Bruck, M., & Seidenberg, M. (1985). Do children use similar processes to read and spell words? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 511–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. (1992). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wiederholt, L., & Bryant, B. (1993). Gray Oral Reading Test (Revised). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G. (1993). Wide Range Achievement Test-3. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W. (1991). Woodcock Language Proficiency Battery-Revised. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson Psychoeducational Battery-Revised. Allen, TX: DLM.
   Google Scholar