Does Whole Language or Instruction Matched to Learning Styles Help Children Learn to Read?

REFERENCES

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (1983). The reading instruction provided readers of differing reading abilities. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 548–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie (Ed.), Comprehension and teaching: Research reviews (pp. 77–117). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A scheme-theoretic view of basic processes in reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–292). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Arter, J. A., & Jenkins, J. A. (1979). Differential diagnosis-prescriptive teaching: A critical appraisal. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 353–391). White Plains, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Carbo, M. (1987). Deprogramming reading failure: Giving unequal learners an equal chance. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 197–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbo, M. (1988). Debunking the great phonics myth. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 226–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbo, M. (1992). Giving unequal learners an equal chance: A reply to a biased critique of learning styles. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1989). Learning to read: The great debate 20 years later. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 521–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, S. M. (1994). Is whole language really warm and fuzzy? The Reading Teacher, 47, 362–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training. Portsmouth, NH: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. M., Hall, D. P., & Defee, M. (1991). Non-ability grouped, multilevel instruction: A year in a first grade classroom. The Reading Teacher, 44, 566–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidman, L. (1981). Learning style: The myth, the panacea, the wisdom. Phi Delta Kappan, 62(9), 641–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, R. S. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practice approaches for grades 3–6. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Edelsky, C., Altwerger, B., & Flores, B. (1991). Whole language: What's the difference? Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Edelsky, C., Draper, K., & Smith, K. (1983). Hookin' em in at the start of the year in a “whole language” classroom. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 14, 257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freppon, P. A., & Dahl, K. L. (1991). Learning about phonics in a whole language classroom. Language Arts, 68, 190–197.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, G., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Modifying reading instruction to maximize its effectiveness of “all” students. In M. S. Knapp & P. M. Shields (Eds.), Better schooling for children of poverty: Alternatives to conventional wisdom (pp. 31–60). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskins, I. W. (1994). Creating optimum learning environments: Is membership in the whole language community necessary? In F. Lehr & J. Osborn (Eds.), Reading, language, and literacy: Instruction for the twenty-first century (pp. 115–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, K. S., & Goodman, Y. M. (1979). Learning to read is natural. In L. B. Resnick & P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading, Vol. 1 (pp. 137–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Y. M. (1989). Roots of the whole-language movement. Elementary School Journal, 90, 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. H. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D., & Hansen, J. (1983). The Author's Chair. Language Arts, 60, 176–183.
   Google Scholar
• Gregore, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 31, 234–236.
   Google Scholar
• Holdaway, D. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Sydney: Ashton-Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1987). Substance over style: Assessing the efficacy of modality testing and teaching. Exceptional Children, 54, 228–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keefe, J. W., & Ferell, B. G. (1990). Developing a defensible learning style paradigm. Educational Leadership, 42(2), 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (1995). Qualitative reading inventory (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper-Collins.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., Stahl, S. A., & Reinking, D. (1994). Critical commentary: On research, politics, and whole language. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, H., O'Keefe, T., & Stephens, D. (1992). Looking closely: Exploring the role of phonics in one whole language classroom. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Mullis, I. V. S., Campbell, J. R., & Farstrup, A. E. (1993). NAEP 1992 Reading Report Card for the Nation and the States. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Development, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. G. McKeown, & M. E. Curtis (Ed.), The nature of vocabulary acquisition (pp. 19–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (1985). Whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. M., & Church, S. M. (1990). Commentary: Myths of whole language. The Reading Teacher, 44, 20–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil, J. (1990). Making sense of style. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1984). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., Rankin, J., & Yakoi, L. (in press). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, L. K. (Ed.). (1993). Literacy assessment: A handbook of instruments. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, H. M. (1972). Visual and auditory modalities related to methods for beginning reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 8, 7–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roswell, F. G., & Chall, J. S. (1992). Diagnostic assessment of reading with trial teaching strategies. New York: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B., & Short, E. J. (1984). Metacognitive differences between skilled and less skilled readers: Remediating deficits through story grammar and attribution training. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 225–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1988). Assessment: In special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, P. (1994). “People who live in glass houses….” In C. B. Smith (Ed.), Whole language: The debate (pp. 81–100). Bloomington, IN: ERIC/EdInfo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, V. E. (1992). Learning styles and learning to read: A critique. Remedial and Special Education, 13, 6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. (1988). Is there evidence to support matching reading styles and initial reading methods? Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 317–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A. (1992). Saying the “P” word: Nine guidelines for effective phonics instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45, 618–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A. (1994). Is whole language “The Real Thing?” Advertisements and research in the debate on whole language. In C. B. Smith (Ed.), Whole language: The debate (pp. 124–142). Bloomington, IN: ERIC and Edinfo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Fairbanks, M. M. (1986). The effects of vocabulary instruction: Model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 56, 72–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., McKenna, M. C., & Pagnucco, J. R. (1994). The effects of whole language instruction: An update and a reappraisal. Educational Psychologist, 29, 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Miller, P. D. (1989). Whole language and language experience approaches for beginning reading: A quantitative research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 87–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Osborn, J., Winsor, P., & Pearson, P. D. (1994). Six teachers in their classrooms: Looking closely at beginning reading. Technical Report. Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Pickle, J. M. (1995). Model of assessment and targeted instruction for disabled readers. In L. R. Putnam (Ed.), How to be a better reading teacher (pp. 141–155). Columbus, OH: Merrill/Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Richek, M. G., & Vandevier, R. (1991). Learning word meanings through listening: A sixth grade replication. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learning factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research. Fortieth yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 185–192). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Suttles, W., & Pagnucco, J. R. (in press). The effects of traditional and process literacy instruction on first graders' reading and writing achievement and orientation toward reading. Journal of Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Most words are learned from context. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The acquisition of word meanings (pp. 89–106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tarver, S., & Dawson, M. M. (1978). Modality preference and the teaching of reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. (1990). Understanding whole language: From principles to practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• White, T. G., Graves, M. F., & Slater, W. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82.
   Google Scholar
• Wixson, K. K., & Lipson, M. Y. (1991). Reading disability. New York: Harper-Collins.
   Google Scholar