Using Computer Technology to Monitor Student Progress and Remediate Reading Problems

REFERENCES

• Aldus Corporation. (1990). Persuasion. San Diego: Author.
   Google Scholar
• MITalk system. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balsam, M., & Hammer, C. (1985). Success with writing. New York: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Barron, R. W., Golden, J. O., Seldon, D. M., Tait, C. F., Marmurek, H. H. C., & Haines, L. P. (1992). Word recognition in early reading: A review of the direct and indirect access hypotheses. Cognition, 24, 93–119.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & Roth, S. F. (1984a). Construct-A-Word. Allen, TX: Developmental Learning Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & Roth, S. F. (1984b). Hint and Hunt. Allen, TX: Developmental Learning Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Brackett, G. (1988). Slide Shop. New York: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Brackett, G. (1989). Super Story Tree. New York: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, C., Eurich-Fulcer, & Scholfield, J. (1994). Teachers, computer tutors, and teaching: The artificially intelligent tutor as an agent for classroom change. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 579–607.
   Google Scholar
• Farmer, M. E., Klein, R., & Bryson, S. E. (1992). Computer-assisted reading: Effects of whole-word feedback on fluency and comprehension in readers with severe disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 13(2), 50–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M., & Rosebery, A. S. (1985a). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 1. Perceptual units training. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 91–130.
   Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, J. R., Warren, B. M., & Rosebery, A. S. (1985b). A componential approach to training reading skills: Part 2. Decoding and use of context. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 271–338.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. (1988). Effects of computer-managed instruction on teachers' implementation of systematic monitoring programs and student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 91(5), 294–303.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Monitoring the performance of mildly handicapped students: Review of current practice and research. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21(1), 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. (1989). Computers and curriculum-based measurement: Effects of teacher feedback systems. School Psychology Review, 18(1), 112–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Ferguson, C. (1992). Effects of expert system consultation within curriculum-based measurement, using a reading maze task. Exceptional Children, 58(5), 436–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L., Hamlett, C., Fuchs, D., Stecker, P. M., & Ferguson, C. (1988). Conducting curriculum-based measurement with computerized data collection: Effects on efficiency and teacher satisfaction. Journal of Special Education, 9(2), 73–86.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S. R., & Pelegrino, J. W. (1987). Information processing and educational microcomputer technology: Where do we go from here? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 144–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, K., & Boone, R. (1989). Hypertext CAI: Maintaining handicapped students in a regular classroom reading program. Cited in Hillinger, M. L. (1992), Computer speech and responsive text. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 219–229.
   Google Scholar
• Hillinger, M. L. (1992). Computer speech and responsive text. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 219–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. M., Torgesen, J. K., & Sexton, M. A. (1987). Using computer guided practice to increase decoding fluency in learning disabled children: A study using the Hint and Hunt I program. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20, 122–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili, A., & Shashaani, L. (1994). The effectiveness of computer applications: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27(1), 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchinskas, G., & Radencich, M. C. (1986). The Semantic Mapper.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchinskas, G., & Radencich, M. C. (1990). The Literary Mapper.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, C. K. (1992). Text-to-speech, text, and hypertext: Reading and spelling with the computer. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(2), 95–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepper, M. R., & Gurtner, J. L. (1989). Children and computers: Approaching the twenty-first century. American Psychologist, 44(2), 170–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, M. W., Barron, R. W., Forbes, J. E., Cuksts, B., & Steinbach, K. A. (1994). Computer speech-based training of literacy skills in neurologically impaired children: A controlled evaluation. Brain and Language, 47, 117–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, G. E. (1987). Language experience recorder plus. Gainesville, FL: Teacher Support Software.
   Google Scholar
• McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1987). Two examples of computer-based research on reading: Eye movement monitoring and computer-aided reading. In D. Reinking (Ed.), Reading and computers: Issues for theory and practice (pp. 97–107). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft Corporation. (1992). Power Point. Seattle: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Mineo, B. A., & Cavalier, A. R. (1990). Speech output technology in education and rehabilitation: Implications from behavioral research. Speech-Tech, 2, 68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson, A. (1992). Synthetic speech and computer aided reading for reading disabled children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(2), 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R. K. (1985). Disabled reading processes ad cognitive profiles. In D. Gray & J. Kavanagh (Eds.), Biobehavioral measures of dyslexia (pp. 215–243). Parkton, MD: York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, R. K., Foltz, G., & Wise, B. (1986). Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 18, 93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, R. K., & Wise, B. (1992). Reading on the computer with orthographic and speech feedback. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 107–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, R. K., Wise, B., Connors, F., & Rack, J. (1990). Organization, heritability, and remediation of component word recognition and language skills in disabled readers. In T. H. Carr & B. A. Levy (Eds.), Reading and its development: Component skills approaches (pp. 261–322). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, R. (1993). A meta-analysis: Effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction at the level of elementary education (K-6). Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Pany, D., & McCoy, K. M. (1988). Effects of corrective feedback on word accuracy and reading comprehension of readers with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 546–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinking, D. (1987). The comprehension connection. St. Louis, MO: Milliken.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, S. F., & Beck, I. L. (1988). Theoretical and instructional implications of the assessment of two microcomputer word recognition programs. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon, G., & Globerson, T. (1988). Can computer tools become cognitive? Unpublished manuscript, Tel Aviv University.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Stanger, D., Clough, S., Elseth, P., & Wood, T. (1994). Muppet Slate. Pleasantville, NY: Sunburst.
   Google Scholar
• Stine, H. A. (1994). The effects of CD-ROM interactive software in reading skills instruction with second-grade Chapter 1 students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Sunburst Communications. (1985). Magic Slate. Pleasantville, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Sunburst Communications. (1994). Author's Toolkit. Pleasantville, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, K. M. (1994). Soundproof: The evaluation of an adaptive technology for persons with reading disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, D'Youville College.
   Google Scholar
• The Learning Company. (1989). The Children's Writing And Publishing Center. Fremont, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dusen, L., & Worthen, B. (1993). Factors that facilitate or impede implementation of integrated learning systems. In G. Bailey (Ed.), Computer-based integrated learning systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B., & Rosebery, A. S. (1988). Theory and practice: Uses of the computer in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 29–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiburg, K. (1995). Integrated learning systems: What does the research say? The Computing Teacher, 22(5), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, B. (1992). Whole words and decoding for short-term learning: Comparisons on a “talking-computer” system. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 147–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, B. W., & Olson, R. K. (1992). How poor readers and spellers use interactive speech in a computerized spelling program. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4(2), 145–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, B., Olson, R. K., Anstett, M., Andrews, L., Terjak, M., Schneider, V., Kostuch, J., & Kriho, L. (1989). Implementing long-term computerized remedial reading program with synthetic speech feedback. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 21, 173–180.
   Google Scholar