Using Interdependent Group-Oriented Reinforcement to Enhance Academic Performance in General Education Classrooms

References

• Akin-Little, K. A., Eckert, T. L., Lovett, B. J., & Little, S. G. (2004). Extrinsic reinforcement in the classroom: Bribery or best practice. School Psychology Review, 33, 344–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames, C., & Ames, R. (1978). The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat: Children's self and interpersonal evaluations in competitive and noncompetitive learning environments. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 12(1), 79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D. C. (1984). The half-full glass: A review of research on teaching. In P. L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching (pp. 51–85). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Billington, E. J., & Ditommaso, N. M. (2003). Demonstrations and applications of the matching law in education. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Billington, E. J., & Skinner, C. H. (2002). Getting students to choose to do more work: Evidence of the effectiveness of the interspersal procedure. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S., & Skinner, C. H. (in press). Combining explicit timing with interdependent group contingency program to decrease transition times: An investigation of the Timely Transitions Game. Journal of Applied School Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Cashwell, C. S., Skinner, C. H., Dunn, M., & Lewis, J. (1998). Group reward programs: A humanistic approach. Humanistic Education and Development, 37, 47–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cates, G. L., & Skinner, C. H. (2000). Getting remedial mathematics students to prefer homework with 40% more problems? An investigation of the strength of the interspersal procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 339–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chance, P. (1992, November). The rewards of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 200–207.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71, 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, B. M., Evans, J. H., Bostow, D. E., Geiger, O. G., & Drash, P. W. (1982). Increasing assignment completion and accuracy using a daily report card procedure. Psychology in the Schools, 19, 540–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., Pierce, W. D., & Cameron, J. (1999). Effect of reward on intrinsic motivation—negative, neutral, and positive: Comment on Deci, Koestner, and Ryan (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 677–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Freeland, J. T., & Noell, G. H. (1999). Maintaining accurate math response in elementary students: The effects of delayed and intermittent reinforcement and programming common stimuli. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 211–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeland, J. T., & Noell, G. H. (2002). Programming for maintenance: An investigation of delayed and intermittent reinforcement and common stimuli to create indiscriminable contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 11, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. R., & Stalling, R. B. (1983, August). Overjustification: Constraint, contrast, or competence? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J. C., & Carta, J. J. (1997). Together we can! Classwide peer tutoring to improve basic academic skills. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. Heward, T. Heron, J. Trap-Porter, & D. Hill (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 58–88). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, F. M., & Gresham, G. N. (1982). Interdependent, dependent, and independent group contingencies for controlling disruptive behavior. Journal of Special Education, 16, 101–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrnstein, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, S. (1985). Dimensions of cooperative classroom structures. In R. Slavin, S. Sharan, S. Kagan, R. Hertz-Lazarowitz, C. Webb, & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 67–96). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1978). History of behavior modification: Experimental foundations of contemporary research. Baltimore: University Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2001). Behavior modification in applied settings (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, M. L., & McCain, A. P. (1995). Promoting academic performance in inattentive children: The relative efficacy of school-home notes with and without response cost. Behavior Modification, 19, 357–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Shernoff, E. S. (2004). Evidence-based practice: Promoting evidence-based interventions in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 33, 34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litow, L., & Pumroy, D. K. (1975). A brief review of classroom group-oriented contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, F. C., McCurdy, B., & Quigley, E. A. (1990). The collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23, 197–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., Halperin, S., Rummel, J. E., & Kilpatrick, D. (1990). Matching theory applied to contingent teacher attention. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., & Houk, J. L. (1989). The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 51, 17–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., Lochner, D. G., & Kelly, S. Q. (1992). The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: A demonstration of matching theory. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 143–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maydosz, A. S. (1998). Rewards are a rat trap. Montessori Life, 10(3), 37–29.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, J. C., Friman, P. C., & Carlyon, W. D. (1999). The effect of token awards on “intrinsic” motivation for doing math. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 375–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, L. A., Waguespack, A. M., Wickstrom, K. F., Witt, J. C., & Gaydos, G. R. (1994). Mystery motivator: An effective and time efficient intervention. School Psychology Review, 23, 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neef, N. A., Mace, F. C., & Shade, D. (1993). Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: The interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 37–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neef, N. A., Mace, F. C., Shea, M. C., & Shade, D. (1992). Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 691–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neef, N. A., Shade, D., & Miller, M. S. (1994). Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 575–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary, K. D., Poulos, R. W., & Devine, V. T. (1972). Tangible reinforcers: Bonuses or bribes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, R. (2004). Differential effects of performance contingent, completion contingent, and no reward conditions on math performance, voluntary task participation, and self-reported interest in math. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
   Google Scholar
• Pavchinski, P., Evans, J. H., & Bostow, E. E. (1989). Increasing word recognition and math ability in severely learning-disabled students with token reinforcers. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 397–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popkin, J., & Skinner, C. H. (2003). Enhancing academic performance in a classroom serving students with serious emotional disturbance: Interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected components. School Psychology Review, 32, 271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeo, F. F. (1998). The negative effects of using a group contingency system of classroom management. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25, 130–134.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, S., & Skinner, C. H. (in press). Using interdependent group contingencies with randomly selected criteria and paired reading to enhance class-wide reading performance. Journal of Applied School Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H. (2003, November). Practical applications of behavior management. Paper presented at the Convention of the Tennessee Association of School Psychologists, Knoxville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H. (2004). Academic engagement. In A. Canter (Ed.), Helping children at home and school-II: Handouts from your school psychologist (pp. 53-1–53-4). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, C., & Dunn, M. (1996). Independent and interdependent group contingencies: Smoothing the rough waters. Special Services in the Schools, 12, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Cashwell, T. H., & Skinner, A. L. (2000). Increasing tootling: The effects of a peer monitored interdependent group contingencies on students' reports of peers' prosocial behaviors. Psychology in the Schools, 37, 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Hennington, C. (1996). Increasing learning trial rates by increasing student response rates. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Skinner, A. L., & Armstrong, K. (2000). Shaping leisure reading persistence in a client with chronic schizophrenia. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 24, 52–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Skinner, C. F., Skinner, A. L., & Cashwell, T. C. (1999). Using interdependent contingencies with groups of students: Why the principal kissed a pig at assembly. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 806–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. H., Wallace, M. A., & Neddenriep, C. E. (2002). Academic remediation: Educational application of research on assignment preference and choice. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 24, 51–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (1991). Cooperative learning and group contingencies. Journal of Behavioral Education, 1, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A., & Quiroz, D. R. (1997). A meta-analysis of interventions to decrease disruptive behavior in public education settings. School Psychology Review, 26, 333–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes, T. F., & Osnes, P. G. (1989). An operant pursuit of generalization. Behavior Therapy, 20, 337–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truchlicka, M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Swain, J. C. (1998). Effects of token reinforcement and response cost on the accuracy of spelling performance with middle-school special education students with behavior disorders. Behavioral Interventions, 13, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Turco, T. L., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Acceptability and effectiveness of group contingencies for improving spelling achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, R. K., Sheridan, S. M., & Jenson, W. R. (1998). The effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and a structured homework program on math completion and accuracy in junior high students. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 281–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbrough, J. L., Skinner, C. H., Lee, Y. J., & Lemmons, C. (in press). Decreasing transition times in a second grade classroom: Experimental support for the Timely Transitions Game. Journal of Applied School Psychology.
   Google Scholar