Using CBM as an Indicator of Decoding, Word Reading, and Comprehension: Do the Relations Change With Grade?

References

• Blalock, H. M., Jr. (1960). Social statistics (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1981). The relationship between curriculum-based mastery measures and standardized achievement tests in reading (Research Report No. 57). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED212662)
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1992). Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21, 45–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment. School Psychology Review, 28, 659–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257–288.
   Google Scholar
• Huberty, C. J. (1994). Applied discriminant analysis. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, J. R., & Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59, 421–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, B., Madden, R., & Gardner, E. F. (1975). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kranzler, J. H., Miller, M. D., & Jordan, L. (1999). An examination of racial/ethnic and gender bias on curriculum-based measurement of reading. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 327–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, S., & Hammill, D. (1976). Test of Written Spelling. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, G. R. (1997, July). Statement on reading. Report presented before the committee on Education and the Workforce, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., Kamons, J., Kowalski, R. L., MacGinitie, R. K., & McKay, T. (1978). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (2nd ed.). Chicago: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• NoChild Left Behind Act. (2002). 20 U.S.C. 6301 et. Seq. (Statute).
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1995). Cognitive research can inform reading education. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 106–115.
   Google Scholar
• Prescott, G. A., Balow, I. H., Hogan, T. P., & Farr, R. C. (1984). Metropolitan Achievement Tests. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, D., Biwer, D., & Hesch, A. (2001, April). Establishing curriculum-based measurement oral reading fluency performance standards to predict success on local and state tests of reading achievement. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Association of School Psychologists, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Stage, S. A. (2001). Program evaluation using hierarchical linear modeling with curriculum-based measurement reading probes. School Psychology Quarterly, 16, 91–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tindal, G., Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Shinn, M. R., Deno, S. L., & Germann, G. (1983). The technical adequacy of a basal reading series mastery test: The Scott-Foresman reading program (Research Report No. 128). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Institute for Research on Learning Disabilities. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED236199)
   Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. M. (1973). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. M. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Corp.
   Google Scholar