74
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Topic: State of the Art Research in Academic and Behavioral Assessment and Intervention

Monitoring Implementation of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring: Identifying and Intervening With Students Who Do Not Maintain Accurate Implementation

Pages 74-86 | Published online: 22 Dec 2019

References

  • Atherley, C. A. (1989). Shared reading: An experiment in peer tutoring in the primary classroom. Educational Studies, 15, 145–153.
  • Balcazar, F., Hopkins, B. L., & Suarez, Y. (1986). A critical, objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7, 65–89.
  • Bentz, J., Shinn, M. R., & Gleason, M. M. (1990). Training general education pupils to monitor reading using curriculum-based measurement procedures. School Psychology Review, 19, 23–32.
  • DuPaul, G. J., Ervin, R. A., Hook, C. L., & McGoey, K. E. (1998). Peer tutoring for children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Effects on classroom behavior and academic performance. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 579–592.
  • Enright, S. M., & Axelrod, S. (1995). Peer tutoring: Applied behavior analysis working in the classroom. School Psychology Quarterly, 10, 29–40.
  • Ezell, H. K., Kohler, F. W., & Strain, P. S. (1994). A program description and evaluation of academic peer tutoring for reading skills of children with special needs. Education and Treatment of Children, 17, 52–67.
  • Fantuzzo, J. W., King, J. A., & Heller, L. R. (1992). Effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on mathematics and school adjustment: A component analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 331–339.
  • Franca, V. M., Kerr, M. M., Reitz, A. L., & Lambert, D. (1990). Peer tutoring among behaviorally disordered students: Academic and social benefits to tutor and tutee. Education and Treatment of Children, 13, 109–128.
  • Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Phillips, N., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. The Elementary School Journal, 97, 223–249.
  • Fueyo, V., & Bushell, D. (1998). Using numberline procedures and peer tutoring to improve the mathematics computation of low-performing first graders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 417–430.
  • Gansle, K. A., & McMahon, C. M. (1997). Component integrity of teacher intervention management behavior using a student self-monitoring treatment: An experimental analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 405–419.
  • Greenwood, C. R. (1991). Longitudinal analysis of time, engagement, and achievement in at-risk versus non-risk students. Exceptional Children, 57, 521–534.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Carta, J. J., & Hall, R. V. (1988). The use of peer tutoring strategies in classroom management and educational instruction. School Psychology Review, 17, 258–275.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In W. Heward, T. Heron, D. Hill, J. Trap-Porter, & D. S. Hill (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp. 55–88). Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Arreaga-Mayer, C., & Finney, R. (1992). The classwide peer tutoring program: Implementation factors moderating students' achievement. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 101–116.
  • Greenwood, C. R., Terry, B., Utley, C. A., Montagna, D., & Walker, D. (1993). Achievement, placement, and services: Middle school benefits of classwide peer tutoring used at the elementary school. School Psychology Review, 22, 497–516.
  • Gresham, F. M. (1989). Assessment of treatment integrity in school consultation and prereferral intervention. School Psychology Review, 18, 37–50.
  • Gresham, F. M., Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., Cohen, S., & Rosenblum, S. (1993). Treatment integrity of school-based behavioral intervention studies: 1980–1990. School Psychology Review, 22, 254–272.
  • Mathes, P. G., & Fuchs, L. S. (1994). The efficacy of peer tutoring in reading for students with mild disabilities: A best-evidence synthesis. School Psychology Review, 23, 59–80.
  • Mortenson, B. P., & Witt, J. C. (1998). The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of a prereferral academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 27, 613–627.
  • Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Gilbertson, D. N., Ranier, D. D., & Freeland, J. T. (1997). Increasing teacher intervention implementation in general education settings through consultation and performance feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 77–88.
  • Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., LaFleur, L. H., Mortenson, B. P., Ranier, D. D., & LeVelle, J. (2000). A comparison of two follow-up strategies to increase teacher intervention implementation in general education following consultation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 271–284.
  • Peterson, L., Homer, A., & Wonderlich, S. (1982). The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 477–492.
  • Rooney-Rebeck, P., & Jason, L. (1986). Prevention of prejudice in elementary school students. Journal of Primary Prevention, 7, 63–73.
  • Salend, S. J., & Nowak, M. R. (1988). Effects of peer-previewing on LD students' oral reading skills. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 11, 47–53.
  • Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15, 5–11.
  • Stokes, T. F., & Baer, D. M. (1977). An implicit technology of generalization. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 349–367.
  • Witt, J. C., Noell, G. H., LaFleur, L. H., & Mortenson, B. P. (1997). Teacher usage of interventions in general education: Measurement and analysis of the independent variable. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 693–696.
  • Yeaton, W. H., & Sechrest, L. (1981). Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 156–167.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.