Effect Sizes in Single Case Research: How Large is Large?

References

• Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1993). Calculating effect sizes for meta-analysis: The case of the single case. Behavior, Research, and Therapy, 31, 621–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, D. B., Silverstein, J. M., & Gorman, B. S. (1996). Power, sample size estimation, and early stopping rules. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.). Design and analysis of single case research (pp. 335–371). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Anhalt, K., McNeil, C. B., & Bahl, A. B. (1998). The ADHD classroom kit: A whole-classroom approach for managing disruptive behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 67–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, D. M. (1977). Perhaps it would be better not to know everything. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 167–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, D. H., & Hersen, M. (Eds.). (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W., & Lewis-Beck, M. (Eds.). (1986). New tools for social scientists: Advances and applications in research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M. A. & Kehle, T. J. (1998). Self-modeling as an intervention for stuttering. School Psychology Review, 27, 587–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujold, A., Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., & Boisvert, J. (1994). Treatment of pathological gamblers: An experimental study. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 275–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnette, M., Boehn, K., Kenyon-Jump, R., Hutton, K., & Stark, C. (1991). Control of genital herpes recurrences using progressive muscle relaxation. Behavior Therapy, 22, 237–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busk, P. L., & Marascuilo, L. A. (1988). Autocorrelation in single-subject research: A counterargument to the myth of no autocorrelation. Behavioral Assessment, 10, 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Busk, P. L., & Serlin, R. C. (1992). Meta-analysis for single case research. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 187–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. (1978). The case against statistical significance testing. Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassisi, J., & McGlynn, F. (1988). Effects of EMG activated alarms on nocturnal bruxism. Behavior Therapy, 19, 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center, B. A., Skiba, R. J., & Casey, A. (1985–1986). A methodology for the quantitative synthesis of intra-subject design research. Journal of Special Education, 19, 387–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, P., & Trower, P. (1996). Cognitive therapy for punishment paranoia: A single case experiment. Behavioral Research and Therapy, 4, 351–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, P. D. (1994). Examining specific cognitive change in cognitive therapy for depression: A controlled case experiment. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 8, 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, P. D., & Lowe, C. F. (1990). Measurement and modification of delusional beliefs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie, J. (1987). The inability of the binominal test to control type I error with single-subject data. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 141–150.
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie, J. (1993). Interrupted time-series analysis with brief single-subject data. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 61, 966–974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosbie, J. (1995). Interrupted time-series analysis with short series: Why it is problematic; How it can be improved. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 361–395). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, R. B., & Carlson, P. M. (1987). Behavioral statistics: Logic & methods. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgington, E. S. (1987). Randomizing single subject experiments and statistical tests. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 437–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faith, M. S., Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (1996). Meta-analysis of single case research. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single case research (pp. 245–277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Fidler, F., & Thompson, B. (2001). Computing correct confidence intervals for ANOVA fixed-and random-effects effect sizes. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 575–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. J. (1985). Point estimates and confidence intervals in measures of association. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 160–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (1991). Regression diagnostics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, R. D., Allison, D. B., & Gorman, B. S. (Eds.). (1996). Design and analysis of single case research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, G. V, Willson, V. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1975). Design and analysis of time-series experiments. Boulder: Colorado Associated University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, B. S., & Allison, D. B. (1996). Statistical alternatives for single case designs. In R. D. Franklin & D. B. Allison & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single case research (pp. 159–214). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Three methods for analyzing time-series (N of 1) data. Behavioral Assessment, 5, 141–154.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, B. F., Norman, K. R., Searle, M. S., Daniels, M., & Lubeck, R. C. (1995). Child abuse and neglect by parents with disabilities: A tale of two families. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 417–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, E. T., Bray, M. A., & Kehle, T. J. (1998). Self-modeling as an intervention to increase student classroom participation. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 363–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, D. P., Gottman, J. M., Jones, R. R., Gardner, W., Kazdin, A. E., & Vaught, R. S. (1980). Interrupted time-series analysis and its application to behavioral data. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 543–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, L. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hintze, J. (2002). NCSS 2002 [Computer Software]. Kaysville, UT: NCSS Statistical Software.
   Google Scholar
• Holtzman, W. H. (1963). Statistical methods for the study of change in the single case. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 199–211). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houten, R. V., & Retting, R. A. (2001). Increasing motorist compliance and caution at stop signs. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, B. D. (1986). Statistical analysis and single-subject designs. In A. Poling & R. W. Fuqua (Eds.), Research methods in applied behavior analysis: Issues and advances (pp. 209–232). New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, B. E. (1985). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: A myth. Behavioral Assessment, 7, 107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, B. E. (2004). Analysis of interrupted time-series experiments using ITSE: A critique. Understanding Statistics, 3, 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, N. S., Follette, W. C., & Revenstorf, D. (1984) Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance. Behavior Therapy, 15, 336–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. (1994). Psychosocial treatment of depression in women: Nine single subject evaluations. Research on Social Work Practice, 4, 267–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R. R., Vaught, R. S., & Weinrott, M. (1977). Time-series analysis in operant research. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 151–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. (1984). Statistical analysis for single case experiments designs. In D. H. Barlow & M. Hersen (Eds.), Single case experimental designs (2nd ed., pp. 285–324). New York: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, L., & Bambara, L. (2002). Class-wide curricular modification to improve the behavior of students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Behavior Disorders, 27, 317–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Brody, G. H. (1978). Single subject designs: A perspective on the controversy over employing statistical inference and implications for research and training in behavior modification. Behavior Modification, 2, 291–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., & Levin, J. R. (Eds.). (1992). Single case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kromrey, J. D., & Foster-Johnson, L. (1996). Determining the efficacy of intervention: The use of effect sizes for data analysis in single-subject research. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65, 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladouceur, R., Freeston, M., Gagnon, F., Thibodeau, N., & Dumont, J. (1993). Idiographic considerations in the behavioral treatment of obsessional thoughts. Journal of Behavioral Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 24, 301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, R., McComas, J. J., & Jawor, J. (2002). The effects of differential and lag reinforcement schedules on varied verbal responding by individuals with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 391–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemanek, K. L., & Gresham, F. M. (1984). Social skills training with a deaf adolescent: implications for placement and programming. School Psychology Review, 13, 385–390.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J. R., & Wampold, B. E. (1999). Generalized single case randomization tests: Flexible analyses for a variety of situations. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 59–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden Software. (1998) [Graph digitizing software.] Linden Software Ltd., Inglenook Cottage, Westoby Lane, Barrow Upon Humber, DN19 7DJ, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, A., & Cole, C. L. (1999). Effects of a parent-implemented intervention on the academic readiness skills of five Puerto Rican Kindergarten students in an urban school. School Psychology Review, 28, 439–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, B. K., Hiralall, A. S., & Bradley, T. A. (1997). A note to teacher: Improving student behavior through goal setting and feedback. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyas, T. A., & Greenwood, K. M. (1996). Serial dependency in single case time series. In R. D. Franklin, D. B. Allison, & B. S. Gorman (Eds.), Design and analysis of single case research (pp. 215–243). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. E., Camp, C. J., & Arvey, R. D. (1981). Measures of strength of association: A comparative examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 525–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, J. L. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., & Hartmann, D. P. (1981). A cautionary not on the use of Omega squared to evaluate the effectiveness of behavioral treatments. Behavioral Assessment, 3, 93–100.
   Google Scholar
• Nourbakhsh, M. R., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (1994). The statistical analysis of single-subject data: A comparative examination. Physical Therapy, 74, 768–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, C. W., Jr. (1990). Time series analysis: Regression techniques (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R., & Brossart, D. (2003). Evaluating single case research data: A comparison of seven statistical methods. Behavior Therapy, 34, 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsonson, B. S., & Baer, D. M. (1992). The visual analysis of data, and current research into the stimuli controlling it. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single case research design and analysis (pp. 15–40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Pray, B., Kramer, J. J., & Lindskog, R. (1986). Assessment and treatment of tic behavior: A review and case study. School Psychology Review, 15, 418–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin, H. (1982). Control rather than abstinence as a goal in the treatment of excessive gambling. Behavior Research and Therapy, 20, 185–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research (rev. ed. Vol. 6). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salend, S. J., Whittaker, C. R., Raab, S., & Giek, K. (1991). Using a self-evaluation system as a group contingency. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 319–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffé, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E. S., Albright, T. S., & Ager, C. L. (1986). Group versus individual contingencies in modifying two disruptive adolescents' behavior. Professional School Psychology, 1, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Sharpe, T., & Lounsbery, M. (1997). The effects of a sequential behavior analysis protocol on the teaching practices of undergraduate trainees. School Psychology Quarterly, 1, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Fouladi, R. T. (1992). R2: A computer program for interval estimation, power calculations, sample size estimation, and hypothesis testing in multiple regression. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 24, 581–582.
   Google Scholar
• Suen, H. K., & Ary, D. (1987). Autocorrelation in applied behavior analysis: Myth or reality? Behavioral Assessment, 9, 125–130.
   Google Scholar
• Swanson, H. L., Kozleski, E., & Stegink, P. (1987). Disabled readers' processing of prose: Do any processes change because of intervention? Psychology in the Schools, 24, 378–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, B. (2002). “Statistical,” “practical,” and “clinical”: How many kinds of significance do counselors need to consider? Journal of Counseling and Development, 80, 64–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tollefson, N., Tracy, D. B., Johnsen, E. P., & Chatman, J. (1986). Teaching learning disabled students goalimplementation skills. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. M., Rusch, F. R., Kazdin, A. E., & Hartmann, D. P. (1989). Applications of meta-analysis in individual subject research. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• White, O. R., & Haring, N. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Winborn, L., Wacker, D. P., Richman, D. M., Asmus, J., & Geier, D. (2002). Assessment of mand selection for functional communication training packages. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 295–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar