Lifestyle changes after a health dialogue
Results from the Live for Life health promotion programme

References

• Statistics-Health and Medical Care. Yearbook of Health and Medical Care 2001. Stockholm: The National Board of Health and Welfare, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice. Recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other societies on coronary prevention. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1434–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qvist J, Johansson SE, Johansson LM. Multivariate ana-lyses of mortality from coronary heart disease due to biological and behavioural factors. Scand J Soc Med 1996;24:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen K, Vaupel JW. Determinants of longevity: genetic, environmental and medical factors. J Intern Med 1996;240:333–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotevatn S, Akslen LA, Bjelke E. Lifestyle and mortality among Norwegian men. Prey Med 1989;18:433–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelmsen L, Rosengren A, Lappas G. Relative impor-tance of improved hospital treatment and primary preven-tion. Results from 20 years of the Myocardial Infarction Register, Goteborg, Sweden. J Intern Med 1999;245: 185–91.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen LB, Schnohr P, Schroll M, Hein HO. All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1621–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant AK, Schatzkin A, Graubard BI, Schairer C. A prospective study of diet quality and mortality in women. JAMA 2000;283:2109–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannamethee SG, Shaper AG, Whincup PH, Walker M. Role of risk factors for major coronary heart disease events with increasing length of follow up. Heart 1999;81:374–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persson L-G, Lindstrom K, Lingfors H, Bengtsson C, Lissner L. Cardiovascular risk during early adult life. Risk markers among participants in "Live for Life" health promotion programme in Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52: 425–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lingfors H, Lindstrom K, Persson L-G, Bengtsson C, Lissner L. Evaluation of "Live for Life", a health promo-tion programme in the County of Skaraborg, Sweden. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55: 277–82.
   Google Scholar
• Persson L-G, Lindstrom K, Lingfors H, Bengtsson C. A study of men aged 33–42 in Habo, Sweden with special reference to cardiovascular risk factors. Design, health profile and characteristics of participants and non-partici-pants. Scand J Soc Med 1994;22: 264–72.
   Google Scholar
• Lingfors H, Persson L-G, Lindstrom K, Ljungquist B, Bengtsson C. Time for a "vision zero" concerning pre-mature death from ischaemic heart disease? Scand J Prim Health Care 2002;20: 28–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingfors H, Lindstrom K, Persson L-G, Bengtsson C, Lissner L, Ellegard L, et al. Evaluation of a pedagogic dietary questionnaire aimed for health surveys. Scand J Nutrition 1994;38:106–11.
   Google Scholar
• Korhonen T, Uutela A, Korhonen HJ, Puska P. Impact of mass media and interpersonal health communication on smoking attempts: a study in North Karelia,1989-1996. J Health Community 1998;3:105–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor-Smith C, Nutbeam D, Moore L, Catford J. Effects of the Heartbeat Wales programme over five years on beha-vioural risks for cardiovascular disease: quasi-experimental comparison of results from Wales and a matched reference area. BMJ 1998;316:818–22.
   Google Scholar
• Luepker RV, Murray DM, Jacobs Jr DR, Mittelmark MB, Bracht N, Carlaw R, et al. Community education for cardiovascular disease prevention: risk factor changes in the Minnesota Heart Health Program. Am J Public Health 1994;84:1383–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen M, Ortendahl C. Folhälsoarbetets fördelar är utvärderarens dilemma. Det subjektiva sunda fornuftet är en bra arbetspartner (Public health work and its advantage as a dilemma of the assessor. Subjective common sense is a good help). Lakartidningen 1998;95:3742–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kanstrup H, Refsgaard J, Engberg M, Flensted Lassen J, Lytken Larsen J, Lauritzen T. Cholesterol reduction follow-ing health screening in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002;20:219–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinehall L. Partnership for health. On the role of primary health care in a community intervention programme [thesis]. Um& Limed University, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group. Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: results of the OXCHECK study after one year. BMJ 1994;308:308–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Family Heart Study Group. Randomised controlled trial evaluating cardiovascular screening and intervention in general practice: principal results of British family heart study. BMJ 1994;308:313–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holme I, Hjermann I, Helgeland A, Leren P. The Oslo Study: Diet and antismoking advice. Additional results from a 5-year primary preventive trial in middle-aged men. Prey Med 1985;14:279–92.
   Google Scholar
• de Lorgeril M, Salen P, Martin JL, Monjaud I, Delaye J, Mamelle N. Mediterranean diet, traditional risk factors, and the rate of cardiovascular complications after myocar-dial infarction: final report of the Lyon Diet Heart Study. Circulation 1999;99:779–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group. Randomised trial of cholesterol lowering in 4444 patients with coronary heart disease: the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Lancet 1994;344:1383–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Group. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study: identification of high-risk groups and comparison with other cardiovascular intervention trials. Lancet 1996;348:1339–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar