1,472
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

A primary care lifestyle programme suitable for socioeconomically vulnerable groups – an observational study

, , , , , & show all
Pages 352-359 | Received 06 Sep 2016, Accepted 11 Oct 2016, Published online: 16 Dec 2016

References

  • Alwan A. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
  • Disease Prevention in the Swedish Healthcare System: health situation, national guidelines and implementation. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen, The National Board of Health and Welfare; 2011.
  • Lindblad U, Ek J, Eckner J, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension: rule of thirds in the Skaraborg project. Scand J Primary Health Care. 2012;30:88–94.
  • Ebrahim S, Taylor F, Ward K, et al. Multiple risk factor interventions for primary prevention of coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;CD001561. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001561.pub3.
  • Marmot M, Friel S, Bell R, et al. Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Lancet. 2008;372:1661–1669.
  • The commission for a socially sustainable Malmö [Internet]. 2013 [cited Mar 1]. Available from: http://www.malmo.se/Commission-for-a-Socially-Sustainable-Malmoe-in-English.html.
  • Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365:1099–1104.
  • Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Living habits. Progress report 2009. Available from: http://www.cabdirect.org/abstracts/20103321311.html.
  • McGill R, Anwar E, Orton L, et al. Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:457.
  • Blomstrand A, Ariai N, Baar AC, et al. Implementation of a low-budget, lifestyle-improvement method in an ordinary primary healthcare setting: a stepwise intervention study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001154.
  • Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic disparities in health: pathways and policies. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:60–76.
  • Blomstrand A, Lindqvist P, Carlsson IE, et al. Low-budget method for lifestyle improvement in primary care: experiences from the Göteborg Health Profile Project. Scand J Primary Health Care. 2005;23:82–87.
  • Saltin B, Grimby G. Physiological analysis of middle-aged and old former athletes. Comparison with still active athletes of the same ages. Circulation. 1968;38:1104–1115.
  • Rosengren A, Tibblin G, Wilhelmsen L. Self-perceived psychological stress and incidence of coronary artery disease in middle-aged men. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:1171–1175.
  • Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. 2012. Integrating nutrition and physical activity. 5th ed. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2014:002.
  • Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C, et al. “The Goteborg Quality of Life Instrument” – a psychometric evaluation of assessments of symptoms and well-being among women in a general population. Scand J Primary Health Care. 1993;11:267–275.
  • Govil SR, Weidner G, Merritt-Worden T, et al. Socioeconomic status and improvements in lifestyle, coronary risk factors, and quality of life: the Multisite Cardiac Lifestyle Intervention Program. Am J Public Health. 2009;99:1263–1270.
  • City of Gothenburg, statistics [Internet]. [cited 2014 Nov 11]. Available from: http://www.goteborgstad.statistik.se.html.
  • Hadgkiss EJ, Jelinek GA, Taylor KL, et al. Engagement in a program promoting lifestyle modification is associated with better patient-reported outcomes for people with MS. Neurol Sci. 2015;36:845–852.
  • Sanson-Fisher RW, Bonevski B, Green LW, et al. Limitations of the randomized controlled trial in evaluating population-based health interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:155–161.
  • Bender AM, Jorgensen T, Helbech B, et al. Socioeconomic position and participation in baseline and follow-up visits: the Inter99 study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;21:899–905.
  • Lingfors H, Lindstrom K, Persson LG, et al. Evaluation of “Live for Life”, a health promotion programme in the County of Skaraborg, Sweden. J Epidemiol Comm Health. 2001;55:277–282.
  • De Craemer M, De Decker E, Verloigne M, et al. The effect of a kindergarten-based, family-involved intervention on objectively measured physical activity in Belgian preschool boys and girls of high and low SES: the ToyBox-study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ. 2014;11:38.
  • Floud S, Balkwill A, Canoy D, et al. Marital status and ischemic heart disease incidence and mortality in women: a large prospective study. BMC Med. 2014;12:42.
  • Cabrera C, Helgesson O, Wedel H, et al. Socioeconomic status and mortality in Swedish women: opposing trends for cardiovascular disease and cancer. Epidemiol. 2001;12:532–536.
  • Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993;88:1973–1998.
  • Mead EL, Gittelsohn J, Roache C, et al. A community-based, environmental chronic disease prevention intervention to improve healthy eating psychosocialfactors and behaviors in indigenous populations in the Canadian Arctic. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40:592–602.
  • Blomstrand A, Blomstrand C, Ariai N, et al. Stroke incidence and association with risk factors in women: a 32-year follow-up of the Prospective Population Study of Women in Gothenburg. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005173.
  • Rautio N, Jokelainen J, Oksa H, et al. Socioeconomic position and effectiveness of lifestyle intervention in prevention of type 2 diabetes: one-year follow-up of the FIN-D2D project. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:561–570.
  • Siren R, Eriksson JG, Peltonen M, et al. Impact of health counselling on cardiovascular disease risk in middle aged men: influence of socioeconomic status. PLoS One. 2014;9:e88959.
  • Guassora AD, Beck Nielsen S, Reventlow S. Deciding if lifestyle is a problem: GP risk assessments or patient evaluations? A conversation analytic study of preventive consultations in general practice. Scand J Primary Health Care. 2015;33:191–198.