Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study

Mie Sara HestbechThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark; Correspondence[email protected]

Dorte Gyrd-HansenCOHERE, Department of Business and Economics and Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark;

Jakob KragstrupThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark;

Volkert SiersmaThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark;

John BrodersenThe Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark; ;Primary Health Care Research Unit, Zealand Region, Denmark

Pages 401-419 | Received 03 Feb 2016, Accepted 17 Jul 2016, Published online: 15 Nov 2016

Cite this article
https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2016.1249056
CrossMark

Full Article
Figures & data
References
Citations
Metrics
Licensing
Reprints & Permissions
View PDF PDF

References

Peirson L, Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Ciliska D, et al. Screening for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2013;2:35.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Raffle A, Gray M. Screening – evidence and practice. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Google Scholar
Schiller JT, Castellsague X, Garland SM. A review of clinical trials of human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines. Vaccine. 2012;30:F123–FF38.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Glasziou PP, Irwig LM. An evidence based approach to individualising treatment. BMJ. 1995;311:1356–1359. English.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
General Medical Council. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2008. Available from: http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/
Google Scholar
Irwig L, McCaffery K, Salkeld G, et al. Informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation. BMJ. 2006;332:1148–1150.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Philips Z, Avis M, Whynes DK. Knowledge of cervical cancer and screening among women in east-central England. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15:639–645.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Idestrom M, Milsom I, Andersson-Ellstrom A. Knowledge and attitudes about the Pap-smear screening program: a population-based study of women aged 20-59 years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;81:962–967.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Larsen LP, Olesen F. Women's knowledge of and attitude towards organized cervical smear screening. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998;77:988–996.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Philips Z, Johnson S, Avis M, et al. Human papillomavirus and the value of screening: young women's knowledge of cervical cancer. Health Educ Res. 2003;18:318–328.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kolthoff SK, Hestbech MS, Jorgensen KJ, Brodersen J. Do invitations for cervical screening provide sufficient information to enable informed choice? A cross-sectional study of invitations for publicly funded cervical screening. J R Soc Med. 2016;109:274–281.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making. 2001;21:37–44.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Halvorsen PA, Kristiansen IS. Decisions on drug therapies by numbers needed to treat: a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1140–1146.
PubMedGoogle Scholar
Liira H, Saarelma O, Callaghan M, et al. Patients, health information, and guidelines: a focus-group study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33:212–219.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
EPI NYT 2013 [updated 2015 Sep 15]. [Internet] Available from: http://www.ssi.dk/Aktuelt/Nyhedsbreve/EPI-NYT/2013/Uge%2020%20-%202013.aspx.
Google Scholar
Pedersen CB. The Danish Civil Registration System. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39:22–25.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Danish Health Authority information folder 2014 [Internet]; [cited 2014 Apr 14]. Available from: http://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/∼/media/B1E5086A3FD44E0293532A661AF8CF72.ashx.
Google Scholar
Ronco G, van BM, Becker N, et al. Process performance of cervical screening programmes in Europe. Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:2659–2670.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Hestbech MS, Lynge E, Kragstrup J, et al. The impact of HPV vaccination on future cervical screening: a simulation study of two birth cohorts in Denmark. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e007921.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Group TFIS. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1915–1927.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Zipkin DA, Umscheid CA, Keating NL, et al. Evidence-based risk communication: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2014;161:270–280.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Collins D. Pretesting survey instruments: an overview of cognitive methods. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:229–238.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Adab P, Marshall T, Rouse A, et al. Randomised controlled trial of the effect of evidence based information on women's willingness to participate in cervical cancer screening. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:589–593.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. 1st edition. London: Penguin Books; 2011.p. 499.
Google Scholar
van Griensven F, Naorat S, Kilmarx PH, et al. Palmtop-assisted self-interviewing for the collection of sensitive behavioral data: randomized trial with drug use urine testing. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:271–278.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Bjorner JB, Rose M, Gandek B, et al. Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:108–113.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Danish Media 2014 [Internet]; [updated 2015 Sep 16; cited 2015]. Available from: http://danskemedier.dk/nyhed/smartphone-alle-har-den-og-alle-bruger-den/.
Google Scholar
Biesecker BB, Schwartz MD, Marteau TM. Enhancing informed choice to undergo health screening: a systematic review. Am J Health Behav. 2013;37:351–359.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Holloway RM, Wilkinson C, Peters TJ, et al. Cluster-randomised trial of risk communication to enhance informed uptake of cervical screening. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:620–625.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
Allen JD, Bluethmann SM, Sheets M, et al. Women's responses to changes in U.S. Preventive Task Force's mammography screening guidelines: results of focus groups with ethnically diverse women. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:1169.
PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar

Share icon
Back to Top

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.

People also read
Recommended articles
Cited by

To cite this article:

Reference style: APA Chicago Harvard

Citation copied to clipboard

Reference styles above use APA (6th edition), Chicago (16th edition) & Harvard (10th edition)

Download citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by citation management software including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks and Reference Manager.

Choose format: RIS BibTex RefWorks Direct Export

Choose options: Citation Citation & abstract Citation & references

Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study

References

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Your download is now in progress and you may close this window

Login or register to access this feature

Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study

References

Related research

To cite this article:

Download citation

Information for

Open access

Opportunities

Help and information

Keep up to date