Sick-listed workers’ expectations about and experiences with independent medical evaluation: a qualitative interview study from Norway

References

• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Sickness, Disability and Work: breaking the barriers. A synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brage S, Bragstad T, Sorbo J. [Where are the sick- listed going?]. Arbeid Og Velferd. 2014;2:116–127.
   Google Scholar
• Kosny A, Brijnath B, Singh N, et al. Uncomfortable bedfellows: employer perspectives on general practitioners’ role in the return-to-work process. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety. 2015;13:65–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Money A, Hussey L, Thorley K, et al. Work-related sickness absence negotiations: GPs' qualitative perspectives. Br J Gen Pract. 2010;60:721–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins A, Porter S, O'Halloran P. General practitioners' management of the long-term sick role. Soc Sci Med. 2014;107:52–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen S, Werner EL, Maeland S, et al. Considerations made by the general practitioner when dealing with sick-listing of patients suffering from subjective and composite health complaints. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29:7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen S, Malterud K. What happens when the doctor denies a patient’s request? A qualitative interview study among general practitioners in Norway. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2017;35:201–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anner J, Kunz R, Boer W. Reporting about disability evaluation in European countries. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:848–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse JW, Bruun-Meyer SE, Ebrahim S, et al. A 45-year-old woman referred for an independent medical evaluation by her insurer. CMAJ. 2014;186:E627–E630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husabo E, Monstad K, Holmås TH, et al. Protocol for the effect evaluation of independent medical evaluation after six months sick leave: a randomized controlled trial of independent medical evaluation versus treatment as usual in Norway. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann M, de Boer W, Schandelmaier S, et al. Use of a structured functional evaluation process for independent medical evaluations of claimants presenting with disabling mental illness: rationale and design for a multi-center reliability study. BMC Psychiatry. 2016;16:271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim S, Sava H, Kunz R, et al. Ethics and legalities associated with independent medical evaluations. CMAJ. 2014;186:248–249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgour E, Kosny A, McKenzie D, et al. Healing or harming? Healthcare provider interactions with injured workers and insurers in workers' compensation systems. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:220–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgour E, Kosny A, Akkermans A, et al. Procedural justice and the use of independent medical evaluations in workers’ compensation. Psychol Inj and Law. 2015;8:153–168.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan D, editor. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. [Qualitative research methods for medicine and health-disciplines]. 4 ed. Oslo: Universitets-forlaget; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Shuy R. In-person versus telephone interviewing. In: Gubrium J, Holstein J, editors. Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publisher; 2002. p. 537–55.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:795–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick G. Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Res Nurs Health. 2008;31:391–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturges JE, Hanrahan KJ. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qual Res. 2004;4:107–118.
   Google Scholar
• Richards H, Emslie C. The 'doctor' or the 'girl from the University'? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing. Fam Pract. 2000;17:71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz JE, McCaffrey RJ. A review of internet sites regarding independent medical examinations: implications for clinical neuropsychological practitioners. Appl Neuropsychol. 2006;13:175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Lovdata Foundation. [National insurance act] 1997 [cited 2016 12/7]. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1997-02-28-19.
   Google Scholar
• Brijnath B, Mazza D, Singh N, et al. Mental health claims management and return to work: qualitative insights from Melbourne, Australia. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:766–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:25–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WorkSafeVictoria. Information for injured workers: Independent medical examinations 2015 [cited 2017 01/09]. Available from: http://www.worksafe.vic.gov.au/home.
   Google Scholar
• Lax M. Independent of what? The independent medical examination business. New Solut. 2004;14:219–251.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenfield G, Pliskin JS, Feder-Bubis P, et al. Patient-physician relationships in second opinion encounters - the physicians' perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1202–1212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman RE, Sullivan A, Back AL, et al. Patients' reflections on communication in the second-opinion hematology-oncology consultation. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;76:44–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsushima W, Foote R, Merrill T, et al. How independent are independent psychological examinations? A workers' compensation dilemma. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1996;27:626–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main C, Sullivan M, Watson P. Pain management: practical applications of the biopsychosocial perspective in clinical and occupational settings. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton DW Jr. The functional IME: a linkage of expertise across the disability continuum. Work. 2006;26:281–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar