Men’s perception of information and descriptions of emotional strain in the diagnostic phase of prostate cancer—a qualitative individual interview study

References

• Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young S-M, Bansal P, Vella ET, et al. Systematic review of clinical features of suspected prostate cancer in primary care. Can Fam Physician. 2015;61(1):e26–e35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottet N, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):618–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norway SP. 2019 [cited 2019 Feb 22]. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/folkemengde
   Google Scholar
• CRoN. Cancer in Norway 2019 – cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• NDH. Pakkeforløp for prostatakreft [Cancer pathway for prostate cancer] (16.10.20). Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of Health 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Owens DK, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2018;319(18):1901–1913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solberg A. Nasjonalt handlingsprogram med retningslinjer for diagnostikk, behandling og oppfølging av prostatakreft [National action plan with guidelines for diagnosis treatment and follow-up of prostate cancer]. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Schildmeijer K, Frykholm O, Kneck Å, et al. Not a straight line-patients' experiences of prostate cancer and their journey through the healthcare system. Cancer Nurs. 2019;42(1):E36–E43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanton V, Docherty A, Meystre C, et al. Finding a pathway: information and uncertainty along the prostate cancer patient journey. Br J Health Psychol. 2009;14(Pt 3):437–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King AJL, Evans M, Moore THM, et al. Prostate cancer and supportive care: a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of men's experiences and unmet needs. Eur J Cancer Care. 2015;24(5):618–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spendelow J, Eli Joubert H, Lee H, et al. Coping and adjustment in men with prostate cancer: a systematic review of qualitative studies. J Cancer Surviv. 2018;12(2):155–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyt MA, Stanton AL, Irwin MR, et al. Cancer-related masculine threat, emotional approach coping, and physical functioning following treatment for prostate cancer. Health Psychol. 2013;32(1):66–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexis O, Worsley AJ. A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies exploring men's sense of masculinity post-prostate cancer treatment. Cancer Nurs. 2018;41(4):298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan A, Kirkman M, Ruseckaite R, et al. Prostate care and prostate cancer from the perspectives of undiagnosed men: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e022842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown D, Oetzel J. Men's use of networks to manage communication tensions related to a potential diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016;20:106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton R, Nanton V, Roscoe J, et al. “Good care” throughout the prostate cancer pathway: perspectives of patients and health professionals. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019;42:36–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle C, Brasel A, Underwood W, et al. Experiences of uncertainty in men with an elevated PSA. Am J Mens Health. 2017;11(1):24–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkman M, Young K, Evans S, et al. Men's perceptions of prostate cancer diagnosis and care: insights from qualitative interviews in Victoria, Australia. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans R, Edwards A, Elwyn G, et al. ‘It's a maybe test’: men's experiences of prostate specific antigen testing in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(537):303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med. 2014;89(9):1245–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Det kvalitative forskningsintervju [The qulitative research interview]. 2nd ed. Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder for medisin og helsefag. 4th ed. Oslo: Universitetsforl.; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):795–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han PKJ, Kobrin S, Breen N, et al. National evidence on the use of shared decision making in prostate-specific antigen screening. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(4):306–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedewa SA, Gansler T, Smith R, et al. Recent patterns in shared decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing in the United States. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(2):139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayman ML, Gulbrandsen P, Morris MA. A patient in the clinic; a person in the world. Why shared decision making needs to center on the person rather than the medical encounter. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(3):600–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickles K, Carter SM, Rychetnik L. Doctors' approaches to PSA testing and overdiagnosis in primary healthcare: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(3):e006367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagland R, Nayoan J, Matheson L, et al. Very difficult for an ordinary guy’: factors influencing the quality of treatment decision-making amongst men diagnosed with localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: findings from a UK-wide mixed methods study. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(4):797–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandasamy S, Khalid AF, Majid U, et al. Prostate cancer patient perspectives on the use of information in treatment decision-making: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2017;17(7):1–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NHD. Pasient- og brukerrettighetsloven med kommentarer [The patient and user rights law]. Oslo: The Norwegian Directorate of Health; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Edwards A, et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme. BMJ. 2017;357:j1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyes S, Harrington A, Paterson J. A thematic review of men's experiences during the waiting period between prostate-specific antigen and prostate biopsy results. J Radiol Nurs. 2011;30(4):158–169.
   Google Scholar
• Brown D, Oetzel J, Henderson A. Communication networks of men facing a diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2016;25(21–22):3266–3278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliffe J. Health behaviors, prostate cancer, and masculinities: a life course perspective. Men Masc. 2009;11(3):346–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar