Experiences and management strategies of Norwegian GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal interview study

References

• WHO. Timeline: WHO's COVID-19 response 20. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline#event-43.
   Google Scholar
• NRK. First case of covid infection in Norway ("Første tilfelle av coronasmitte i Norge") 2020. Available from: https://www.nrk.no/norge/forste-tilfelle-av-koronasmitte-i-norge-1.14920058.
   Google Scholar
• Alsnes IV, Munkvik M, Flanders WD, et al. How well did Norwegian general practice prepare to address the COVID-19 pandemic? Fam Med Com Health. 2020;8(4):e000512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Government. Comprehensive measures to combat the coronavirus ("Omfattende tiltak for å bekjempe koronaviruset") [cited 2020 Oct 06]. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/nye-tiltak/id2693327/.
   Google Scholar
• Ursin G, Skjesol I, Tritter J. The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway: the dominance of social implications in framing the policy response. Health Policy Technol. 2020; 2020/12/01/9(4):663–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonsen KA, Hunskaar S, Sandvik H, et al. Capacity and adaptations of general practice during an influenza pandemic. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sripa P, Hayhoe B, Garg P, et al. Impact of GP gatekeeping on quality of care, and health outcomes, use, and expenditure: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(682):e294–e303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matenge S, Sturgiss E, Desborough J, et al. Ensuring the continuation of routine primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of the international literature. Fam Pract. 2021;39(4):747–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibberd J, Carter J, McCoy M, et al. General practice in the time of COVID-19: a mixed-methods service evaluation of a primary care COVID-19 service. IJERPH. 2021;18(6):2895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renaa T, Brekke M. Restructuring in a GP practice during the COVID-19 pandemic – a focus-group study. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2021;141(2).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsopra R, Frappe P, Streit S, et al. Reorganisation of GP surgeries during the COVID-19 outbreak: analysis of guidelines from 15 countries. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saint-Lary O, Gautier S, Le Breton J, et al. How GPs adapted their practices and organisations at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: a french national observational survey. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e042119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander GC, Tajanlangit M, Heyward J, et al. Use and content of primary care office-based vs telemedicine care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2021476-e2021476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigurdsson EL, Blondal AB, Jonsson JS, et al. How primary healthcare in Iceland swiftly changed its strategy in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Open. 2020;10(12):e043151-e043151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HOD. Act on municipal health and care services ("Lov om kommunale helse- og omsorgstjenester"). 2011. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2011-06-24-30.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik H. The Norwegian regular general practitioner scheme. Fam Med Primary Care Rev. 2006;8:314–319.
   Google Scholar
• HOD. Regulations for The Regular General Practitiones Scheme in the municipalities ("Forskrift om fastlegeordning i kommunene"). 2012. Available from: https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2012-08-29-842.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik H. Evaluation of the GP reform 2001-2005: summary and analysis of the evaluation’s sub-projects ("Evaluering av fastlegereformen 2001-2005: sammenfatning og analyse av evalueringens delprosjekter"). Oslo; 2006. (Council TNReditor.)
   Google Scholar
• Lilleås E. The GP scheme: CPR minus ("Fastlegeordningen: HLR minus"). Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 2018; 138.
   Google Scholar
• Hermanowicz JC. The longitudinal qualitative interview. Qual Sociol. 2013; 2013/06/0136(2):189–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grøndahl E. Routines for use of Zoom for red data at the Univeristy of Oslo ("Rutiner for bruk av Zoom for røde data ved Universitetet i Oslo") [updated 2020 Jun 06; cited 2020 Nov 06]. Available from: https://www.uio.no/tjenester/it/sikkerhet/lsis/tillegg/rutiner/bruk-av-zoom-for-rode-data.html.
   Google Scholar
• UIO. Audio-tape with red data ("Ta opp lyd med røde data") [updated 2020 Feb 07; cited 2020 Nov 06]. Available from: https://www.uio.no/tjenester/it/adm-app/nettskjema/hjelp/tips-triks/fortroligedata-diktafon.html.
   Google Scholar
• UIO. Services for sensitive data (TSD) ("Tjenester for sensitive data") [cited 2020 Nov 06]. Available from: https://www.uio.no/tjenester/it/forskning/sensitiv/.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Thematic analysis. APA handbook of research methods in psychology. Vol 2: research designs: quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. APA handbooks in psychology®. Washington (DC): american Psychological Association; 2012. p. 57–71.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine. 2014;89(9):1245–1251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calman L, Brunton L, Molassiotis A. Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: lessons learned and recommendations for health services research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013; 2013/02/0613(1):14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borek AJ, Pilbeam C, Mableson H, et al. Experiences and concerns of health workers throughout the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: a longitudinal qualitative interview study. PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0264906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernemark H, Skagerström J, Seing I, et al. Working conditions in primary healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interview study with physicians in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2022;12(2):e055035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenen L, Poel LV, Schoenmakers B, et al. The impact of COVID-19 on the well-being, education and clinical practice of general practice trainees and trainers: a national cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):108–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotomayor-Castillo C, Nahidi S, Li C, et al. General practitioners’ knowledge, preparedness, and experiences of managing COVID-19 in Australia. Infect Dis Health. 2021;26(3):166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desborough J, Dykgraaf SH, Phillips C, et al. Lessons for the global primary care response to COVID-19: a rapid review of evidence from past epidemics. Fam Pract. 2021;38(6):811–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies M, Carr D, Dugan J, et al. Support FOR general practitoners DURING covid-19. Ulster Med J. 2021;90(3):151–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albert SL, Paul MM, Nguyen AM, et al. A qualitative study of high-performing primary care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22(1):237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerold M, Gottschalk M, Debbeler CM, et al. Healthcare professionals’ perceptions of impacts of the covid-19-pandemic on outpatient care in rural areas: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linde K, Bergmaier C, Torge M, et al. The diversity of opinion among general practitioners regarding the threat and measures against COVID-19 – cross-sectional survey. Eur J Gen Pract. 2021;27(1):176–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deml MJ, Minnema J, Dubois J, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the continuity of care for at-risk patients in swiss primary care settings: a mixed-methods study. Soc Sci Med. 2022;298:114858–114858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebenhofer A, Huter S, Avian A, et al. COVI-Prim survey: challenges for Austrian and german general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19. PLoS One. 2021;16(6):e0251736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilbeam C, Edwards G, Tonkin-Crine S, et al. Primary care preparedness for the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a survey of NHS GPs. Fam Pract. 2021;39(3):332–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurotschka PK, Serafini A, Demontis M, et al. General practitioners’ experiences during the first phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy: a critical incident technique study. Front Public Health. 2021;9:623904–623904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanat M, Hoste M, Gobat N, et al. Transformation of primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of healthcare professionals in eight european countries. Br J Gen Pract. 2021;71(709):e634–e642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisele M, Pohontsch NJ, Scherer M. Strategies in primary care to face the SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 pandemic: an online survey. Front Med. 2021;8:613537–613537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Mintzberg on management: inside our strange world of organizations. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Yukl G. Leadership in organizations. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. Managing the myths of health care. World Hosp Health Serv. 2012;48(3):4–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbott A. The system of professions: an essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago (IL): university of Chicago Press; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson E, editor. Professional dominance: the social structure of medical care. Boca Raton (FL): Routledge; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Høye S, Braend AM, Spehar I. Quality improvement and antimicrobial stewardship in general practice – the role of the municipality chief medical officer. A qualitative study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020;8(3):352–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar