Attitudes of primary healthcare chief physicians towards research in Finland – a national study

References

• Chan M. Return to Alma-Ata. Lancet. 2008;372(9642):865–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hummers-Pradier EBM, Chevallier P, Eilat-Tsanani S, et al. Research agenda for general practice/family medicine and primary healthcare in Europe. Maastricht: European General Practice Research Network EGPRN; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• van Weel C, Rosser WW. Improving healthcare globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(Suppl 2):S5–S16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Weel C, Schers H, Timmermans A. Healthcare in the Netherlands. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(Suppl 1):S12–S17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sullivan F, Butler C, Cupples M, et al. Primary care research networks in the United Kingdom. BMJ. 2007;334(7603):1093–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quality A. Practice-based research networks. 2016 [cited 2022 Jun 23]. Available from: https://pbrn.ahrq.gov
   Google Scholar
• Dania A, Nagykaldi Z, Haaranen A, et al. A review of 50-years of international literature on the internal environment of building practice-based research networks (PBRNs). J Am Board Fam Med. 2021;34(4):762–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagykaldi Z. Practice-based research networks at the crossroads of research translation. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014;27(6):725–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVoe JE, Likumahuwa-Ackman SM, Angier HE, et al. A practice-based research network (PBRN) roadmap for evaluating COVID-19 in community health centers: a report from the OCHIN PBRN. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33(5):774–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mold JW, Peterson KA. Primary care practice-based research networks: working at the interface between research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(Suppl 1):S12–S20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dania A, Nease D, Nagykaldi Z, Greiver M, editors. Setting up an international collaborative group for PBRNs – a WONCA initiative. Proceedings from Workshop in NAPCRG PBRN Conference; 2022; Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Gaglioti AH, Werner JJ, Rust G, et al. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) bridging the gaps between communities, funders, and policymakers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(5):630–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming DM, Crombie DL. The incidence of common infectious diseases: the weekly returns service of the royal college of general practitioners. Health Trends. 1985;17(1):13–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Weel C. The continuous morbidity registration Nijmegen: background and history of a Dutch general practice database. Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14(Supp 1):5–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kristoffersen ES, Bjorvatn B, Halvorsen PA, et al. The Norwegian PraksisNett: a nationwide practice-based research network with a novel IT infrastructure. Scand J Prim Healthcare. 2022;40:217–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela TH. Building a primary care research network – lessons to learn. Scand J Prim Healthcare. 2017;35(3):229–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I BJ, Björk Brämberg E, Wåhlin C, et al. Promoting evidence-based practice for improved occupational safety and health at workplaces in Sweden. Report on a practice-based research network approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(15):5283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumanen M, Reho T, Heikkilä T, et al. Research orientation among general practitioners compared to other specialties. Scand J Prim Healthcare. 2021;39(1):10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decree of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health on the funding of university-level health research 888/2019. Available from: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2019/20190888
   Google Scholar
• Pulcini J, Sheetz A, Desisto M. Establishing a practice-based research network: lessons from the Massachusetts experience. J Sch Health. 2008;78(3):172–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderko L, Lundeen S, Bartz C. The midwest nursing centers consortium research network: translating research into practice. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2006;7(2):101–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soós M, Temple-Smith M, Gunn J, et al. Establishing the victorian primary care practice based research network. Aust Fam Physician. 2010;39(11):857–862.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter Y. Research opportunities in primary care. 1st ed. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• O’Regan A, Hayes P, O’Connor R, et al. The university of Limerick education and research network for general practice (ULEARN-GP): practice characteristics and general practitioner perspectives. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVoe JE, Likumahuwa S, Eiff MP, et al. Lessons learned and challenges ahead: report from the OCHIN safety net west practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(5):560–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birtwhistle R, Keshavjee K, Lambert-Lanning A, et al. Building a pan-Canadian primary care sentinel surveillance network: initial development and moving forward. J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(4):412–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon P, O’Brien KK, McDonnell R, et al. Prevalence of prescribing in pregnancy using the Irish primary care research network: a pilot study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15(1):67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Etz RS, Keith RE, Maternick AM, et al. Supporting practices to adopt registry-based care (SPARC): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeVoe JE, Gold R, Spofford M, et al. Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the safety net west practice-based research network (SNW-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2011;24(5):597–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan BM, Sills MR, Graham D, et al. Stakeholder engagement in a patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measure implementation: a report from the SAFTINet practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(1):102–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chmiel C, Bhend H, Senn O, et al. The FIRE project: a milestone for research in primary care in Switzerland. Swiss Med Wkly. 2011;140:w13142.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lamont R, Fishman T, Sanders PF, et al. View from the canoe: co-designing research pacific style. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(2):172–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volmink JA, Furman SN. The South african sentinel practitioner research network organization, objectives, policies and methods. S Afr Fam Pract. 1991;12:407–471.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn JM. Should Australia develop primary care research networks? Med J Aust. 2002;177(2):63–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rait G, Rogers S, Wallace P. Primary care research networks: perspectives, research interests and training needs of members Prim Healthcare Res Dev. 2002;3(1):4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ciemins EL, Mollis BL, Brant J, et al. Clinician engagement in research as a path towards the learning health system: a regional survey across the northwestern United States. Health Serv Manage Res. 2020;33(1):33–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le May A, Mulhall A, Alexander C. Bridging the research–practice gap: exploring the research cultures of practitioners and managers. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28(2):428–437. 1998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askew DA, Clavarino AM, Glasziou PP, et al. General practice research: attitudes and involvement of Queensland general practitioners. Med J Aust. 2002;177(2):74–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• TENK FNBoRI. Ethical review. 2021 [cited 2022 Jun 23]. Available from: https://tenk.fi/en/ethical-review
   Google Scholar
• Wasserman R, Serwint JR, Kuppermann N, et al. The APA and the rise of pediatric generalist network research. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11(3):195–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple-Smith MN, Manski-Nankervis J-A, Lau P, et al. MACH a snapshot of Australian practice based research networks in primary care. A report from the Melbourne Academic Centre. Victoria, Australia: Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne; 2021. p. 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan F, Hinds A, Pitkethly M, et al. Primary care research network progress in Scotland. Eur J Gen Pract. 2014;20(4):337–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truyers C, Goderis G, Dewitte H, et al. The intego database: background, methods and basic results of a flemish general practice-based continuous morbidity registration project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014;14(1):48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HD, Dunleavey J. Wessex primary care research network: a report on two years progress. Southampt Health J. 1996;3:43–47.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkethly M, Sullivan F. Networking four years of TayRen. Prim Healthcare Res Dev. 2003;4(4):279–283.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Family Physicians. Practice-based research networks in the 21st century: the pearls of research. Washington (DC): MFP; 1998. https://www.aafp.org/dam/AAFP/documents/patient_care/nrn/pearlsofresearch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Comino E. The Winston Churchill Memorial Trust of Australia Churchill Fellowship 2002: primary healthcare research (networks in the United Kingdom). 2002. p. 1 − 38. Available from: http://nswcfa.churchilltrust.com.au/media/fellows/Comino_Elizabeth_2002-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cooke J, Owen J, Wilson A. Research and development at the health and social care interface in primary care: a scoping exercise in one national health service region. Health Soc Care Community. 2002;10(6):435–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans D, Exworthy M, Peckham S, et al. Primary care research networks report to the NHS executive South and West Institute for health policy studies. Southampton: University of Southampton; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Tulinius C, Nielsen AB, Hansen LJ, et al. Increasing the general level of academic capacity in general practice: introducing mandatory research training for general practitioner trainees through a participatory research process. Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(1):57–67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams RL, McPherson L, Kong A, et al. Internet-based training in a practice-based research network consortium: a report from the primary care multiethnic network (PRIME net). J Am Board Fam Med. 2009;22(4):446–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zallman L, Tendulkar S, Bhuyia N, et al. Provider’s perspectives on building research and quality improvement capacity in primary care: a strategy to improve workforce satisfaction. Clin Transl Sci. 2013;6(5):404–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson KA, Lipman PD, Lange CJ, et al. Supporting better science in primary care: a description of practice-based research networks (PBRNs) in 2011. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012;25(5):565–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss BD, Brega AG, LeBlanc WG, et al. Improving the effectiveness of medication review: guidance from the health literacy universal precautions toolkit. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(1):18–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiks AG, Grundmeier RW, Steffes J, et al. Comparative effectiveness research through collaborative electronic reporting Consortium. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):e215-24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards DA, Bower P, Chew-Graham C, et al. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2016;20(14):1–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu KS, Kidd MR, Grunfeld E, et al. The university of Toronto family medicine report: caring for our diverse populations. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto, Department of Family and Community Medicine; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Authority F. Findata – Finnish social and health data permit authority. 2022 [cited 2022 May 15]. Available from: https://findata.fi/en/
   Google Scholar
• Wouters RH, Graaf R, Voest EE, et al. Learning healthcare systems: highly needed but challenging. Learn Health Syst. 2020;4(3):e10211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• College of Family Physicians of Canada. Position statement: supporting access to data in electronic medical records for quality improvement. Mississauga (ON): College of Family Physicians of Canada; 2017. Available from: https://www.cfpc.ca/en/policy-innovation/health-policy-goverment-relations/cfpc-policy-papers-position-statements/position-statement-supporting-access-to-data-in-el
   Google Scholar