Supporting professionals to implement integrated, person-centered care for people with chronic conditions: the TARGET pilot study

References

• Hopman P, Heins MJ, Korevaar JC, et al. Health care utilization of patients with multiple chronic diseases in The Netherlands: differences and underlying factors. Eur J Intern Med. 2016;35:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.08.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes S, Salzberg C, McCarthy D, et al. High-need, high-cost patients: who are they and how do they use health care? A population-based comparison of demographics, health care use, and expenditures. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2016;27:1–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Anderson G, Burke S, et al. Tailoring complex-care management, coordination, and integration for high-need, high-cost patients: a vital direction for health and health care. National Academy of Medicine, Washington, DC; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Citizens Advice. A very general practice: how much time do GPs spend on issues other than health? London; 2015 [cited 2022 Jul 9]. Available from: https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/our-work/policy/policy-research-topics/health-and-care-policy-research/public-services-policy-research/a-very-general-practice-how-much-time-do-gps-spend-on-issues-other-than-health
   Google Scholar
• Doty MM, Tikkanen R, Shah A, et al. Primary care physicians’ role in coordinating medical and health-related social needs in eleven countries. Health Aff. 2020;39(1):115–123. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinley N, McCain RS, Convie L, et al. Resilience, burnout and coping mechanisms in UK doctors: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(1):e031765. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West CP, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med. 2018;283(6):516–529. doi: 10.1111/joim.12752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodner DL, Spreeuwenberg C. Integrated care: meaning, logic, applications, and implications – a discussion paper. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2(4):e12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.67.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Government of United Kingdom. Health and Social Care Act 2012; 2012 [cited 2022 Jul 9]. Available from: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/contents/enacted
   Google Scholar
• Singer SJ, Burgers J, Friedberg M, et al. Defining and measuring integrated patient care: promoting the next frontier in health care delivery. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(1):112–127. doi: 10.1177/1077558710371485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuik SI, Mayer EK, Darzi A. Patient segmentation analysis offers significant benefits for integrated care and support. Health Aff. 2016;35(5):769–775. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong JL, Lim KK, Matchar DB. Population segmentation based on healthcare needs: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1105-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struijs JN, Drewes HW, Stein KV. Beyond integrated care: challenges on the way towards population health management. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15(4):e043. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2424.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson GF, Ballreich J, Bleich S, et al. Attributes common to programs that successfully treat high-need, high-cost individuals. Am J Manag Care. 2015;21(11):e597–e600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, et al. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13(1):e010. doi: 10.5334/ijic.886.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuttner L, Hockett Sherlock S, Simons CE, et al. My goals are not their goals: barriers and facilitators to delivery of patient-centered care for patients with multimorbidity. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(16):4189–4196. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07533-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets RGM, Kroese M, Ruwaard D, et al. Person-centred and efficient care delivery for high-need, high-cost patients: primary care professionals’ experiences. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01172-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawlinson C, Carron T, Cohidon C, et al. An overview of reviews on interprofessional collaboration in primary care: barriers and facilitators. Int J Integr Care. 2021;21(2):32. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets RGM, Hertroijs DFL, Mukumbang FC, et al. First things first: how to elicit the initial program theory for a realist evaluation of complex integrated care programs. Milbank Q. 2022;100(1):151–189. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisartsenzorg Drenthe (HZD). Over ons; 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.hzd.nu/over-hzd
   Google Scholar
• Struijs JN, Baan CA. Integrating care through bundled payments—lessons from The Netherlands. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):990–991. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1011849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struijs J, Van Til J, Baan C. Experimenting with a bundled payment system for diabetes care in The Netherlands: the first tangible effects. Bilthoven: RIVM; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hameleers N, Elissen A, Kroese M, et al. Op weg naar een integraal programma chronische zorg: resultaten deelonderzoek in de zorggroep Huisartsenzorg Drenthe. Maastricht, the Netherlands: Maastricht University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets RGM, Elissen AMJ, Kroese M, et al. Identifying subgroups of high-need, high-cost, chronically ill patients in primary care: a latent class analysis. PLOS One. 2020;15(1):e0228103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu (RIVM). Chronische aandoeningen en multimorbiditeit | Leeftijd en geslacht; 2022. Available from: https://www.vzinfo.nl/chronische-aandoeningen-en-multimorbiditeit/leeftijd-en-geslacht
   Google Scholar
• van Oostrom SH, Picavet HSJ, van Gelder BM, et al. Multimorbidity and comorbidity in the Dutch population – data from general practices. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):715. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-715.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumenthal D, Chernof B, Fulmer T, et al. Caring for high-need, high-cost patients—an urgent priority. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):909–911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1608511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa JF, Zhou X, Jha AK. Characteristics and spending patterns of persistently high-cost Medicare patients. Health Aff. 2019;38(1):107–114. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinehart DJ, Oronce C, Durfee MJ, et al. Identifying subgroups of adult superutilizers in an urban safety-net system using latent class analysis: implications for clinical practice. Med Care. 2018;56(1):e1–e9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, Knottnerus JA, Green L, et al. How should we define health? BMJ. 2011;343(2):d4163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, van Vliet M, Giezenberg M, et al. Towards a ‘patient-centred’ operationalisation of the new dynamic concept of health: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open. 2016;6(1):e010091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt R, Hibberd C, Cameron IM, et al. The patient centered assessment method (PCAM): integrating the social dimensions of health into primary care. J Comorb. 2015;5(1):110–119. doi: 10.15256/joc.2015.5.35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoshida S, Matsushima M, Wakabayashi H, et al. Validity and reliability of the patient centred assessment method for patient complexity and relationship with hospital length of stay: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(5):e016175. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets RGM, Hertroijs DFL, Kroese MEAL, et al. The patient centered assessment method (PCAM) for Action-Based biopsychosocial evaluation of patient needs: validation and perceived value of the Dutch translation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(22):11785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel GL. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science. 1977;196(4286):129–136. doi: 10.1126/science.847460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, et al. Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: development of a conceptual framework. PLOS One. 2016;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson RM, Fretz RI, Shaw LL. Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Evans C, Lewis J. Analysing semi-structured interviews using thematic analysis: exploring voluntary civic participation among adults. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Nowell LS, Norris JM, White DE, et al. Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Int J Qual Methods. 2017;16(1):160940691773384. doi: 10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts K, Dowell A, Nie J-B. Attempting rigour and replicability in thematic analysis of qualitative research data; a case study of codebook development. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0707-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble H, Heale R. Triangulation in research, with examples. Evid Based Nurs. 2019;22(3):67–68. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarz M, Scherrer A, Hohmann C, et al. COVID-19 and the academy: it is time for going digital. Energy Res Soc Sci. 2020;68:101684. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger EP, Fox L, Loeb S, et al. Virtual classrooms: how online college courses affect student success. Am Econ Rev. 2017;107(9):2855–2875. doi: 10.1257/aer.20151193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchner JE, Parker LE, Bonner LM, et al. Roles of managers, frontline staff and local champions, in implementing quality improvement: stakeholders’ perspectives. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):63–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01518.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long P, Abrams M, Milstein A, et al. Effective care for high-need patients. Washington, DC: National Academy of Medicine; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn J, Straube BM, Bell KM, et al. Using population segmentation to provide better health care for all: the “bridges to health” model. Milbank Q. 2007;85(2):185–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00483.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Goh H, Kwan YH, et al. Identifying optimal indicators and purposes of population segmentation through engagement of key stakeholders: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2020;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0519-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppa D, Winchester SB, McAlvin E, et al. Use of social determinants of health codes in home-based primary care. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2021;34(1):42–49. doi: 10.1097/JXX.0000000000000586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye CF, Kaminski MA. Improve patient-centered care, decrease provider burnout, maximize Z codes, minimize hierarchical condition category codes. Popul Health Manag. 2022;25(1):1–3. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong HP, Luke AA, Hammond G, et al. Utilization of social determinants of health ICD-10 Z-codes among hospitalized patients in the United States, 2016–2017. Med Care. 2020;58(12):1037–1043. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janett RS, Yeracaris PP. Electronic medical records in the American health system: challenges and lessons learned. Cien Saude Colet. 2020;25(4):1293–1304. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232020254.28922019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet M, Doornenbal BM, Boerema S, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of a positive health measurement scale: a factor analysis study based on a Dutch population. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e040816. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. An introduction to scientific realist evaluation. Evaluation for the 21st century: a handbook. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications; 1997. p. 405.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, et al. Realist synthesis: an introduction. ESRC research methods programme paper. Manchester: University of Manchester; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs AM, Valentijn PP, Thiyagarajan JA, et al. Elements of integrated care approaches for older people: a review of reviews. BMJ Open. 2018;8(4):e021194. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirst M, Im J, Burns T, et al. What works in implementation of integrated care programs for older adults with complex needs? A realist review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017;29(5):612–624. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmens LC, Molema CCM, Versnel N, et al. Integrated care programs for patients with psychological comorbidity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. 2015;79(6):580–594. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.07.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struckmann V, Leijten FRM, van Ginneken E, et al. Relevant models and elements of integrated care for multi-morbidity: results of a scoping review. Health Policy. 2018;122(1):23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.08.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Singer SJ, Kerrissey M, Friedberg M, et al. A comprehensive theory of integration. Med Care Res Rev. 2020;77(2):196–207. doi: 10.1177/1077558718767000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, et al. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11(1):19. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seckler E, Regauer V, Rotter T, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of multi-disciplinary care pathways in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01179-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husk K, Blockley K, Lovell R, et al. What approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A realist review. Health Soc Care Community. 2020;28(2):309–324. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertroijs DFL, Elissen AMJ, Brouwers MCGJ, et al. Preferences of people with type 2 diabetes for diabetes care: a discrete choice experiment. Diabet Med. 2020;37(11):1807–1815. doi: 10.1111/dme.13969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescheny JV, Pappas Y, Randhawa G. Facilitators and barriers of implementing and delivering social prescribing services: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2893-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar